Rotational angiography of the carotid artery bifurcation: Technical aspects and preliminary results;Angiografia rotazionale della biforcazione carotidea aspetti tecnici e risultati preliminari

Radiologia Medica

Volumn 104, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 157-164

  Pozzi Mucelli, Fabio ^a,b   Pecenco, Renzo ^a   Calderan, Loretta ^a   Pozzi Mucelli, Roberto ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TRIESTE   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TRIESTE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Angiography; Carotid arteries; Rotational

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOGRAPHY; ARTERY OCCLUSION; ARTICLE; CAROTID ARTERY; CAROTID ARTERY BIFURCATION; CATHETERIZATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL OBSERVATION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HEMODYNAMIC MONITORING; HUMAN; IMAGE INTENSIFIER; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY; MALE; QUALITY CONTROL; ROTATIONAL ANGIOGRAPHY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; X RAY TUBE;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANGIOGRAPHY; CAROTID ARTERY, COMMON; CAROTID STENOSIS; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ROTATION; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 0036764370     PISSN: 00338362     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Fox AJ: Comparisons between carotid duplex sonography and cerebral angiography in assessing the degree of carotid stenosis. AJNR 21: 618-619, 2000.
2. Corti R, Ferrari C, Roberti M et al: Spiral Computed Tomography: A novel diagnostic approach for investigation of the extracranial cerebral arteries and its complementary role in duplex ultrasonography. Circulation 98: 984-989, 1998.
3. Porsche C: Evaluation of cross-sectional luminal morphology in carotid atherosclerotic disease by use of spiral CT angiography. Stroke 32: 2511-2515, 2001.
4. Goddard AJ, Mendelow AD, Birchall D: Computed tomography angiography in the investigation of carotid stenosis. Clin Radiol 56: 523-534, 2001.
5. Jackson MR, Chang AS, Robles HA et al: Determination of 60% or greater carotid stenosis:a prospective comparison of magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasound with conventional angiography. Ann Vasc Surg 12: 236-243, 1998.
6. Binaghi S, Maeder P, Uske A et al: Three-dimensional computed tomography angiography and magnetic resonance angiography of carotid bifurcation stenosis. Eur Neurol 46: 25-34, 2001.
7. Fayed AM, White CJ, Ramee SR et al: Carotid and cerebral angiography performed by cardiologists: Cerebrovascular complications. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 55: 277-280, 2002.
8. Young N, Chi KK, Ajaka J et al: Complications with outpatient angiography and interventional procedures. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 25: 123-126, 2002.
9. Fisher M, Ahmadi J, Zee CS et al: Arteriography of the carotid bifurcation: Oblique projections. Neurology 35: 1201-1204, 1985.
10. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaboration: Beneficial effect of carotid endoarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med 325: 445-453, 1991.
11. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endoarterectomy Trial (NASCET) Steering Committee: North American Symptomatic Carotid Endoarterectomy Trial: Methods, patients characteristics and progress. Stroke 22: 711-720, 1991.
12. Fox AJ: How to measure carotid stenosis. Radiology 186: 316-318, 1993.
13. Anxionnat R, Bracard S, Ducrocq X et al: Intracranial aneurysms: Clinical value of 3D digital subtraction angiography in the therapeutic decision and endovascular treatment. Radiology 218: 799-808, 2001.
14. Tanoue S, Kiyosue H, Kenai H et al: Three-dimensional reconstructed images after rotational angiography in the evaluation of intracranial aneurysms: Surgical correlation. Neurosurgery 47: 866-871, 2000.
15. Bosanac Z, Miller RJ, Jain M: Rotational digital subtraction carotid angiography: Technique and comparison with static digital subtraction angiography. Clin Radiol 53: 682-687, 1998.
16. Elgersma OE, Buijs PC, Wust AF et al: Maximum internal carotid arterial stenosis: Assessment with rotational angiography versus conventional intraarterial digital subtraction angiography. Radiology 213: 777-783, 1999.
17. Elgersma OE, Wust AF, Buijs PC et al: Multidirectional depiction of internal carotid arterial stenosis: Three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography versus rotational and conventional digital subtraction angiography. Radiology 216: 511-516, 2000.
18. Gattoni F, Dova S, Tonolini M et al: Study of the liver and the portal venous system with digital rotational angiography. Radiol Med 101: 118-124, 2001.
19. Seymour HR, Matson MB, Belli A-M et al: Rotational digital subtraction angiography of the renal arteries: Technique and evaluation in the study of native and transplant renal arteries. Br J Radiol 74: 134-141, 2001.
20. Yamamoto K, Maeda S, Kameoka N et al: Rotational digital angiography for the evaluation of iliac artery disease. Int J Angiol 8: 11-15, 1999.
21. Gattoni F, Sacrini A, Tonolini M et al: Digital rotational angiography in the study of vascular diseases: Technical note and initial clinical applications. Radiol Med 96: 570-573, 1998.
22. van den Berg JC, Overtoom TT, de Valois JC et al: Using three-dimensional rotational angiography for sizing of covered stents. Am J Roentgenol 178: 149-152, 2002.
23. Jeans WD, Mackenzie S, Baird RN: Angiography in transient cerebral ischaemia using three views of the carotid bifurcation. Br J Radiol 59: 135-142, 1986.
24. Barnett HJ, Taylor DW, Eliasziw M et al: Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. N Engl J Med 339:1415-1425, 1998.