Educational implications of nurse practitioner students and medical residents' attitudes toward managed care

Journal of Professional Nursing

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 263-270

  Breer, M Lynn ^a   Pohl, Joanne M ^b   Stommel, Manfred ^c   Barkauskas, Violet H ^b   Schillo, Barbara ^d   Oakley, Deborah ^b  

^a Michigan Public Health Institute   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^c MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d Minnesota Partnership Action Tobacco   (United States)

Author keywords

Advanced practice nursing students; Attitudes; Factor analysis; Managed care; Medical residents

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECONOMICS; EDUCATION; EDUCATION PROGRAM; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HEALTH ECONOMICS; HEALTH INSURANCE; HUMAN; INDEPENDENCE; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MANAGED CARE; MANAGED CARE ORGANIZATION; MEDICAID; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL PERSONNEL; MEDICAL STUDENT; NURSE ATTITUDE; NURSE PRACTITIONER; NURSING EDUCATION; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PREVENTIVE MEDICINE; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; RESIDENT; STANDARD; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0036760806     PISSN: 87557223     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/jpnu.2002.129622     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Aventis Pharmaceuticals Inc. (2000). Managed care trends digest 2000 [On-line].
2. Blue, A. V., Mainous, A. G., Connor, M., & Medio, F. (1999). Incoming primary care interns' attitudes toward knowledge of managed care. Academic Medicine, 74, S81-S83.
3. Hensrud, D. D. (2000). Clinical preventive medicine in primary care: Background and practice: 1. Rational and current preventive practices. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 75, 165-172.
4. Hojat, M., Veloski, J. J., Gonnella, J. S., Erdmann, J. B., & Rattner, S. (1999). A brief instrument to measure attitudes of medical students toward changes in the health care system. Academic Medicine, 74, S78-S80.
5. InterStudy: (1999). The Competitive Edge 9.1: HMO Industry Report.
6. Lazarus, G. S., Foulke, G., Bell, R. A., Siefkin, A. D., Keller, K., & Kravitz, R. L. (1998). The effects of a managed care educational program on faculty and trainee knowledge, attitudes, and behavioral intentions. Academic Medicine, 73, 1107-1113.
7. Mainous, A. G., Blue, A. V., Griffith, C. H., Maxwell, A. J., & Schwartz, R. W. (1997). Assessing residents' readiness for working in a managed care environment. Academic Medicine, 72, 385-387.
8. Pew Health Professions Commission. (1995). Critical challenges: Revitalizing the health professions for the twenty-first century. The Third Report of the Pew Health Professions Commission.
9. Pew Health Professions Commission. (1998). Recreating Health Professional Practice for a New Century. The Fourth Report of the Pew Health Professions Commission.
10. Pohl, J. M., Bostrom, A., Talarczak, G., & Cavanagh, S. (In Press). Development of an academic Consortium: Nurse Managed Primary Care. Nursing and Health Care Perspectives.
11. Spector, P. E. (1992). Summated rating scale construction: An introduction. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.