Processing computer tomography bone data for prosthetic finite element modeling: A technical note

Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development

Volumn 39, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 609-613

  Saxena, Rakesh ^a   Zachariah, Santosh G ^a   Sanders, Joan E ^a  

^a University of Washington   (United States)

Author keywords

Active contour model; Amputee; Fibula; Snakes; Tibia

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; BONE; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; PROSTHETICS;

CONTOUR CONTINUITY;

COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BONE PROSTHESIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DISABLED PERSON; FIBULA; IMAGE ANALYSIS; LEG AMPUTATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TECHNIQUE; TIBIA;

ALGORITHMS; AMPUTATION; ARTIFICIAL LIMBS; FIBULA; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; TIBIA; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 0036759845     PISSN: 07487711     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Silver-Thorn MB, Steege JW, Childress DS. A review of prosthetic interface stress investigations. J Rehabil Res Dev 1996;33:253-66.
2. Zachariah SG, Sanders JE. Interface mechanics in lower-limb external prosthetics: A review of finite element models. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 1996;4:288-302.
3. Zhang M, Mak AF, Roberts VC. Finite element modelling of a residual lower-limb in a prosthetic socket: A survey of the development in the first decade. Med Eng Phys 1998;20:360-73.
4. He P, Xue K, Chen Q, Murka P, Schall S. A PC-based ultrasonic data acquisition system for computer-aided prosthetic socket design. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 1996;4:114-19.
5. Sumner DR, Olson CL, Freeman PM, Lobick JJ, Andriacchi TP. Computed tomographic measurement of cortical bone geometry. J Biomech 1989;22:649-53.
6. Sageflat JH, Olstad B, Torp AH. Automatic custom femoral stem design based on active contours. Proc SPIE, Med Imaging Image Processing 1995;2434:426-37.
7. Snel JG, Venema HW, Grimbergen CA. Detection of the carpal bone contours from 3-D MR images of the wrist using a planar radial scale-space snake. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1998;17:1063-72.
8. Safont LV, Marroquin EM. 3D reconstruction of third proximal femur (31-) with active contours. Proceedings 10th International Conference on Image Analysis and Processing; 1999; Venice, Italy. Los Alamitos (CA): IEEE Computer Society; 2002. p. 458-63.
9. Kass M, Witkin A, Terzopoulos D. Snakes: Active contour models. Int J Comput Vis 1988;1:321-31.
10. Amini AA, Weymouth TE, Jain RC. Using dynamic programming for solving variational problems in vision. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Machine Intell 1990;12:855-67.
11. Bregler C, Slaney M. SNAKES, Interval Research Corporation; 1995.