Money and challenger emergence in gubernatorial primaries

Political Research Quarterly

Volumn 55, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 653-667

  Bardwell, Kedron ^a  

^a GRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036758780     PISSN: 10659129     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/106591290205500308     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Adams, Greg D., and Peverill Squire. 1997. "Incumbent Vulnerability and Challenger Emergence in Senate Election." Political Behavior 19:97-111.
2. Aldrich, John H., and Forrest D. Nelson. 1984. Linear Probability, Logit, and Probit Models. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
3. Beck, Nathaniel, and Jonathan N. Katz. 1995. "What To Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data." American Political Science Review 89: 634-47.
4. Beyle, Thad L. 1986. "The Cost of Becoming Governor." Journal of State Government 59: 95-101.
5. Beyle, Thad L. 1990a. "Costs of Gubernatorial Campaigns: 1987." Comparative State Politics 11: 28-29.
6. _. 1990b. "Costs of Gubernatorial Campaigns: 1988." Comparative State Politics 11: 30-32.
7. _. 1991. "Costs of 1990 the Gubernatorial Campaigns." Comparative State Politics 12: 3-7.
8. _. 1996. "The Cost of Winning." State Government News 39: 10-14.
9. _. 2001. "U.S. Official Job Approval Ratings, State Governors 1958-2000 Database." http://www.unc.edu/̃beyle/jars.html (February 20, 2001).
10. Beyle, Thad L., and Jennifer Jensen. 2001. "Gubernatorial Campaign Expenditures Database." http://www.unc.edu/̃beyle/guber.html (February 20, 2001).
11. Biersack, Robert, Paul S. Herrnson, and Clyde Wilcox. 1993. "Seeds for Success: Early Moneyin Congressional Elections." Legislative Studies Quarterly 18: 535-51.
12. Boyd, Richard W. 1989. "The Effects of Primaries and Statewide Races on Voter Turnout." Journal of Politics 51: 713-39.
13. Cox, Gary W., and Jonathan N. Katz. 1996. "Why Did the Incumbency Advantage in U.S. House Elections Grow?" American Journal of Political Science 40: 478-97.
14. Epstein, David, and Peter Zemsky 1995. "Money Talks: Deterring Quality Challengers in Congressional Elections." American Political Science Review 89: 295-308.
15. Erickson, Robert S., and Thomas R. Palfrey. 1998. "Campaign Spending and Incumbency: An Alternative Simultaneous Equations Approach." Journal of Politics 60: 355-73.
16. _. 2000. "Equilibria in Campaign Spending Games: Theory and Data." American Political Science Review 94: 595-609.
17. Feigenbaum, Edward D., and James A. Palmer. 1998. Campaign Finance Law 98: A Summary of State Campaign Finance Laws. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
18. Gerber, Alan. 1998. "Estimating the Effect of Campaign Spending on Senate Election Outcomes Using Instrumental Variables." American Political Science Review 92: 401-11.
19. Gierzynski, Anthony, and David A. Breaux. 1998. "The Financing Rote of the Parties." In Joel A. Thompson and Gary E. Moncrief eds., Campaign Finance in State Legislative Elections, pp. 185-205. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
20. Goldenberg, Edie N., Michael W. Traugott, and Frank R. Baumgartner. 1986. "Preemptive and Reactive Spending in U.S. House Races." Political Behavior 8: 3-20.
21. Green, Donald P., and Jonathan S. Krasno. 1988. "Salvation for the Spendthrift Incumbent: Reestimating the Effects of Campaign Spending in House Elections." American Journal of Political Science 32: 884-907.
22. _. 1990. "Rebuttal to Jacobson's 'New Evidence for Old Arguments'." American Journal of Political Science 34: 363-72.
23. Gross, Donald A., and Robert K. Goidel. 2001. "The Impact of State Campaign Finance Laws." State Politics and Policy Quarterly 1: 180-95.
24. Goidel, Robert K., Donald A. Gross, and Todd G. Shields. 1999. Money Matters. Lanham, MD: Rowan and Littlefield.
25. Hagle, Timothy M., and Glenn E. Mitchell II. 1992. "Goodness-of-Fit Measures for Probit and Logit." American Journal of Political Science 36: 762-84.
26. Hogan, Robert E. 1999. "Campaign Spending in State Legislative Primary Elections." State and Local Government Review 31:214-20.
27. Hogan, Robert E., and Keith E. Hamm. 1998. "Variations in District-Level Campaign Spendingin State Legislatures." In Campaign Finance in State Legislative Elections, ed. Joel A. Thompson and Gary E. Moncrief. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly. Pp. 59-79.
28. Hosmer, David, and Stanley Lemeshow. 1989. Applied Logistic Regression. New York: Wiley.
29. Jacobson, Gary C. 1978. "The Effects of Campaign Spending in Congressional Elections." American Political Science Review 72: 469-91.
30. Jacobson, Gary C. 1980. Money in Congressional Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.
31. _. 1989. "Strategic Politicians and the Dynamics of U.S. House Elections, 1946-86." American Political Science Review 83: 773-93.
32. _. 1990. "The Effects of Campaign Spending in House Elections: New Evidence for Old Arguments." American Journal of Political Science 34: 334-62.
33. _. 2001. The Politics of Congressional Elections. New York: Longman.
34. Jacobson, Gary C., and Samuel Kernell. 1983. Strategy and Choice in Congressional Elections. 2d ed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
35. Jewell, Malcolm E., and Sarah M. Morehouse. 2001. Political Parties and Elections in American States. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
36. Kahn, Kim Fridkin, and Patrick J. Kenney 1999. The Spectacle of U.S. Senate Campaigns. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
37. Kazee, Thomas A. 1994. "Ambition and Candidacy: Running as a Strategic Calculation." In Who Runs for Congress?: Ambition, Context, and Candidate Emergence, pp. 165-84. Washington DC: Congressional Quarterly.
38. Kenney, Patrick J., and Tom W. Rice. 1984. "The Effect of Primary Divisiveness in Gubernatorial and Senatorial Elections." Journal of Politics 46: 904-15.
39. Kenny, Christopher, and Michael McBurnett. 1994. "An Individual-Level Multi-equation Model of Expenditure Effects in Contested House Elections." American Political Science Review 88: 699-707.
40. Krasno, Jonathan S., Donald Philip Green, and Jonathan A. Cowden. 1994. "The Dynamics of Campaign Fundraising in House Elections." Journal of Politics 56: 460-74.
41. Malbin, Michael J., and Thomas L. Gais. 1998. The Day After Reform: Sobering Campaign Finance Lessons from the States. Albany: Rockefeller Institute Press.
42. Menard, Scott. 1995. Applied Logistic Regression Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
43. Mondak, Jeffery J. 1995. "Competence, Integrity, and the Electoral Success of Congressional Incumbents." Journal of Politics 57: 1043-69.
44. Partin, Randall W. 1999. "Assessing the Impact of Campaign Spending in Governor's Races." Paper presented at the 1999 Meeting of the American Political Science Association.
45. Patterson, Samuel C. 1982. "Campaign Spending in Contests for Governor." Western Political Quarterly 35: 457-77.
46. Squire, Peverill. 1989a. "Challengers in U.S. Senate Elections." Legislative Studies Quarterly 14: 531-47.
47. _. 1989b. "Competition and Uncontested Seats in U.S. House Elections." Legislative Studies Quarterly 14: 281-95.
48. _. 1991. "Preemptive Fundraising and Challenger Profile in Senate Elections." Journal of Politics 53:1150-64.
49. _. 1992. "Challenger Profile and Gubernatorial Elections." Western Political Quarterly 45: 125-42.
50. _. 1995. "Candidates, Money, and Voters: Assessing the State of Congressional Elections Research." Political Research Quarterly 48: 891-917.
51. Squire, Peverill, and Christina Fastnow. 1994. "Comparing Gubernatorial and Senatorial Elections." Western Political Quarterly 47: 705-20.
52. Tidmarch, Charles M., Lisa J. Hyman, and Jill E. Sorkin. 1984. "Press Issue Agendas in the 1982 Congressional and Gubernatorial Election Campaigns." Journal of Politics 46: 1226-42.
53. Wrighton, J. Mark, and Peverill Squire. 1997. "Uncontested Seats and Electoral Competition for the U.S. House of Representatives Over Time." Journal of Politics 59: 452-68.