Temporal coherence in visual rotation

Vision Research

Volumn 42, Issue 21, 2002, Pages 2463-2469

  Barraza, José F ^a   Grzywacz, Norberto M ^a  

^a University Park OHE 500 ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Flash lag; Localization; Motion; Rotation; Temporal coherence

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; LUMINANCE; MEASUREMENT; MOTION; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ROTATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISION; VISUAL SYSTEM;

HUMANS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MOTION PERCEPTION; OPTICAL ILLUSIONS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; ROTATION; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0036754763     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(02)00260-2     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Adelson E.H., Bergen J.R. Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. Journal of the Optical Society of America. 2:1985;284-299.
2. Baldo M.V.C., Klein S.A. Extrapolation or attention shift? Nature. 378:1995;565-566.
3. Barraza, J. F., & Grzywacz, N. M. (2002). Measurement of angular velocity in the perception of rotation. Vision Research, in press
4. Brenner E., Smeets J.B.J. Motion extrapolation is not responsible for the flash-lag effect. Vision Research. 40:2000;1645-1648.
5. Burgi P.Y., Yuille A.L., Grzwacz N.M. Probabilistic motion estimation based on temporal coherence. Neural Computation. 12:2000;1839-1867.
6. Burr D.C., Ross J., Morrone M.C. Seeing objects in motion. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B. 227:1986;249-265.
7. Burr D.C., Santoro L. Temporal integration of optic flow, measured by contrast and coherence thresholds. Vision Research. 41:2001;1891-1899.
8. Duffy C.J., Wurtz R.H. Sensitivity of MST neurons to optic flow stimuli. II. Mechanisms of response selectivity revealed by small-field stimuli. Journal of Neurophysiology. 65:1991;1346-1359.
9. Eagleman D.M., Sejnowski T.J. Motion integration and postdiction in visual awareness. Science. 287:2000;2036-2038.
10. Freeman T.A.C., Harris M.G. Human sensitivity to expanding and rotating motion: effects of complementary masking and directional structure. Vision Research. 32:1992;81-87.
11. Gibson J.J. The perception of the visual world. 1950;Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
12. Graziano M.S.A., Andersen R.A., Snowden R.J. Tuning of MST neurons to spiral motions. Journal of Neuroscience. 14:1994;54-67.
13. Grzywacz N.M., Harris J.M., Amthor F.R. Computational and neural constraints for the measurement of local visual motion. Smith A.T., Snowden R.J. Visual detection of motion. 1994;19-50 Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
14. Kirschfeld K., Kammer T. The fröhlich effect: a consequence of the interaction of visual focal attention and metacontrast. Vision Research. 39:1999;3702-3709.
15. Koenderink J.J., van Doorn A.J. Local Structure of movement parallax of the plane. Journal of the Optical Society of America. 66:1976;717-723.
16. Krekelberg B., Lappe M. Temporal recruitment along the trajectory of moving objects and the perception of position. Vision Research. 39:1999;2669-2679.
17. Krekelberg B., Lappe M. A model of the perceived relative positions of moving objects based upon a slow averaging process. Vision Research. 39:2000;2669-2679.
18. Krekelberg B., Lappe M. Neuronal latencies and the position of moving objects. TRENDS in Neuroscience. 24:2001;335-339.
19. MacKay D.M. Perceptual stability of a stroboscopically lit visual field containing self luminous objects. Nature. 181:1958;507-508.
20. Mateeff S., Bohdanecky Z., Hohnsbein J., Ehrenstein W.H., Yakimoff N. A constant latency difference determine directional anisotropy in visual motion perception. Vision Research. 31:1991;2235-2237.
21. Mateeff S., Yakimoff N., Hohnsbein J., Ehrenstein W.H., Bohdanecky Z., Radil T. Selective directional sensitivity in visual motion perception. Vision Research. 31:1991;131-138.
22. McKee S.P., Welch L. Sequential recruitment in the discrimination of velocity. Journal of the Optical Society of America. A/2:1985;243-251.
23. McKee S.P., Silverman G.H., Nakayama K. Precise velocity discrimination despite random variations in temporal frequency and contrast. Vision Research. 26:1986;609-619.
24. Mitrani L., Dimitrov G. Retinal location and visual localization during pursuit eye movement. Vision Research. 22:1982;1047-1051.
25. Morrone M.C., Burr D.C., Vaina L.M. Two stages of visual processing for radial and circular motion. Nature. 376:1995;507-509.
26. Movshon J.A., Adelson E.H., Gizzi M.S., Newsome W.T. The analysis of moving visual patterns. Chagas C., Gattas R., Gross C.G. Pattern recognition mechanisms. 1985;117-151 Vatican Press, Rome.
27. Nijhawan R. Motion extrapolation in catching. Nature. 370:1994;256-257.
28. Nijhawan R. Visual decomposition of colour through motion extrapolation. Nature. 386:1997;66-69.
29. Nijhawan R. The flash-lag phenomenon: object motion and eye movements. Perception. 30:2001;263-282.
30. Ramachandran V.S., Anstis S.M. Extrapolation of motion path in human visual perception. Vision Research. 23:1983;83-85.
31. Rao R.P.N., Eagleman D.M., Sejnowski T.J. Optimal smoothing in visual motion perception. Neural Computation. 13:2001;1243-1253.
32. Regan D., Beberley K.J. Visual responses to vorticity and the neural analysis of optic flow. Journal of the Optical Society of America. A/2:1985;280-283.
33. Shadlen M.N., Newsome W.T. The variable discharge of cortical neurons: implications for connectivity, computation, and information coding. Journal of Neuroscience. 18:1998;3870-3896.
34. Snowden R.J., Braddick O.J. Extension of displacement limits in multiple-exposure sequences of apparent motion. Vision Research. 29:1989;1777-1787.
35. Tanaka A., Saito H. Analysis of motion of the visual field by direction, expansion/contraction, and rotation cells clustered in the dorsal part of the medial superior temporal area of the macaque monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology. 62:1989;626-641.
36. van Santen J.P., Sperling G. Elaborated Reichardt detectors. Journal of the Optical Society of America. A/2:1985;300-321.
37. Verghese P., Watamaniuk S.N.J., McKee S.P., Grzywacz N.M. Local motion detectors cannot account for the detectability of an extended motion trajectory in noise. Vision Research. 39:1999;19-30.
38. Watamaniuk S.N.J. Visible persistence is reduced by fixed-trajectory motion but not by random motion. Perception. 21:1992;791-802.
39. Watamaniuk S.N.J., McKee S.P. Seeing motion behind occluders. Nature. 377:1995;729-730.
40. Watamaniuk S.N.J., Sekuler R. Temporal and spatial integration in dynamic random-dot stimuli. Vision Research. 32:1992;2341-2347.
41. Watamaniuk S.N.J., McKee S.P., Grzywacz N.M. Detecting a trajectory embedded in random-direction motion noise. Vision Research. 35:1995;65-77.
42. Watson A.B., Ahumada A.J. Jr. Model of human visual-motion sensing. Journal of the Optical Society of America. A/2:1985;322-341.
43. Whitney D., Cavanagh P. Motion distorts visual space: shifting the perceived position of remote stationary objects. Nature Neuroscience. 3:2000;954-959.
44. Whitney D., Murakami I. Latency difference, not spatial extrapolation. Nature Neuroscience. 1:1998;656-657.
45. Whitney D., Murakami I., Cavanagh P. Illusory spatial offset of a flash relative to a moving stimulus is caused by differential latencies for moving and flashed stimuli. Vision Research. 40:2000;137-149.