Helmholtz stereopsis: Exploiting reciprocity for surface reconstruction

International Journal of Computer Vision

Volumn 49, Issue 2-3, 2002, Pages 215-227

  Zickler, Todd E ^a   Belhumeur, Peter N ^b   Kriegman, David J ^c  

^a Yale University   (United States)

^b Columbia University ^*  (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

BRDF; Helmholtz reciprocity; Photometric stereo; Reflectance; Stereo; Surface reconstruction

Indexed keywords

CAMERAS; COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY; CONSTRAINT THEORY; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; LIGHT SOURCES; PATTERN MATCHING; PHOTOMETRY; PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION; PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS; RADIOMETRY; STEREO VISION;

BIDIRECTIONAL REFLECTANCE DISTRIBUTION FUNCTION; HELMHOLTZ RECIPROCITY; HELMHOLTZ STEREOPSIS; PHOTOMETRIC STEREOPSIS; SURFACE RECONSTRUCTION;

COMPUTER VISION;

EID: 0036753456     PISSN: 09205691     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1020149707513     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Ashikhmin, M., Premoze, S., and Shirley, P. 2000. A microfacet-based BRDF generator. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH, pp. 65-74.
2. Belhumeur, P. 1993 A binocular stereo algorithm for reconstructing sloping, creased, and broken surfaces in the presence of half-occlusion. In Proc. Int. Conf. on Computer Vision, pp. 431-438.
3. Belhumeur, P. 1996. A Bayesian approach to binocular stereopsis. Int. Journal of Computer Vision, 19(3):237-260.
4. Belhumeur, P. and Mumford, D. 1992. A Bayesian treatment of the stereo correspondence problem using half-occluded regions. In Proc. IEEE Conf. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 506-512.
5. Clarke, F. and Parry, D. 1985. Helmholtz reciprocity: Its validity and application to reflectometry. Lighting Research and Technology, 17(1):1-11.
6. Cook, R. and Torrance, K. 1981. A reflectance model for computer graphics. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH, pp. 307-316.
7. Cox, I.J., Hingorani, S., Maggs B.M., and Rao, S.B. 1992. Stereo without disparity gradient smoothing: A Bayesian sensor fusion solution. In British Machine Vision Conference, D. Hogg and R. Boyle (Eds.). Springer-Verlag: Berlin, pp. 337-346.
8. Deverney, F. and Faugeras, O. 1994. Computing differential properties of 3-D shapes from stereoscopic images without 3-D models. In Proc. IEEE Conf. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 208-213.
9. Faugeras, O. and Keriven, R. 1998. Variational principles, surface evolution, PDE's, level set methods, and the stereo problem. IEEE Trans. Image Processing, 7(3):336-344.
10. Frankot, R.T. and Chellappa, R. 1988. A method for enforcing integrability in shape from shading algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 10(4):439-451.
11. Geiger, D., Ladendorf, B., and Yuille, A. 1992. Occlusions and binocular stereo. In Proc. European Conf. on Computer Vision, pp. 425-433.
12. Hayakawa, K. 1994. Photometric stereo under a light source with arbitrary motion. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 11(11):3079-3089.
13. He, X.D., Heynen, P., Phillips, R., Torrance, K., Salesin, D., and Greenberg, D. 1992. A fast and accurate light reflection model. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH, pp. 253-254.
14. Helmholtz, H.V. 1925. Treatise on Physiological Optics, Vol. 1. Dover: New York.
15. Ikeuchi, K. and Horn, B. 1981. Numerical shape from shading and occluding boundaries. Artificial Intelligence, 17: 141-184.
16. Koenderink, J. and van Doorn, A. 1996 Bidirectional reflection distribution function expressed in terms of surface scattering modes. In Proc. European Conf. on Computer Vision, pp. II:28-39.
17. Koenderink, J., van Doorn, A., Dana, K., and Nayar, S. 1999. Bidirectional reflection distribution function of thoroughly pitted surfaces. Int. Journal of Computer Vision, 31 (2/3):129-144.
18. Langer, M. and Zucker, S.W. 1994. Shape-from-shading on a cloudy day. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 11(2):467-478.
19. Lu, J. and Little, J. 1999. Reflectance and shape from images using a collinear light source. Int. Journal of Computer Vision, 32(3):1-28.
20. Magda, S., Zickler, T., Kriegman, D., and Belhumeur, P., 2001. Beyond Lambert: Reconstructing surfaces with arbitrary BRDFs. In Proc. Int. Conf. on Computer Vision, pp. 391-398.
21. Matthies, L. 1992. Stereo vision for planetary rovers: Stochastic modeling to near real-time implementation. Int. Journal of Computer Vision, 8(1):71-91.
22. Minnaert, M. 1941. The reciprocity principle in lunar photometry. Astrophysical Journal, 93:403-410.
23. Nayar, S., Ikeuchi, K., and Kanade, T. 1990. Determining shape and reflectance of hybrid surfaces by photometric sampling. IEEE J. of Robotics and Automation, 6(4):418-431.
24. Nicodemus, F., Richmond, J., Hsia, J., Ginsberg, I., and Limperis, T. 1977. Geometric considerations and nomenclature for reflectance. Monograph 160, National Bureau of Standards (US).
25. Oren, M. and Nayar, S. 1996 Generalization of the Lambertian model and implications for machine vision. Int. Journal of Computer Vision, 14(3):227-251.
26. Phong, B. 1975. Illumination for computer-generated pictures. Comm. of the ACM, 18(6):311-317.
27. Poggio, T., Torre, V., and Koch, C. 1985. Computational vision and regularisation theory. Nature, 317:314-319.
28. Silver, W. 1980. Determining shape and reflectance using multiple images. Master's Thesis, MIT.
29. Snyder, W., Wan, Z., and Li, X. 1998. Thermodynamic constraints on reflectance reciprocity and Kirchoff's law. Applied Optics, 37(16):3464-3470.
30. Tagare, H. and deFigueiredo, R. 1991. A theory of photometric stereo for a class of diffuse non-Lambertian surfaces. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 13(2):133-152.
31. Torrance, K. and Sparrow, E. 1967. Theory for off-specular reflection from roughened surfaces. J. Opt. Soc. Am., 57(9):1105-1114.
32. Woodham, R. 1981. Analysing images of curved surfaces. Artificial Intelligence, 17:117-140.