Economic integration without policy coordination: The case of Mercosur

Emerging Markets Review

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 269-291

  Baer, Werner ^a   Cavalcanti, Tiago ^b   Silva, Peri ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b NOVA SCHOOL OF BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Exchange rate volatility; Protectionist policies; Trade

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036745119     PISSN: 15660141     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1566-0141(02)00025-0     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Averbug, A., 1998. Mercosul: Conjuntura e Perspectivas. Revista do BNDES, Dezembro.
2. Baer, W., 2001. The Brazilian Economy: Growth and Development, 5th ed. Praeger, Westport, CT.
3. Baer, W., Miles, W.R., 2001. In: Baer, W., Miles, W.R. (Eds.). Foreign Direct Investment in Latin America: Its Changing Nature at the Turn of the Century. The Haworth Press, New York.
4. Baumann, R., 2001. Mercosul: origens, ganhos, desencontros e perspectivas. Mercosul: Avanços e Desafios da Integração. ECLAC, Brazilian office.
5. Bergstrand, J., 1989. The generalized gravity equation, monopolistic competition, and the factor proportions theory in international trade. Rev. Econ. Stat. 71, 143-153.
6. Brandão, A.S., Pereira, L.V., 1997. Mercosul: Perspectivas de Integração, 2nd ed. Getúlio Vargas Foundation Press.
7. Bevilaqua, A.S., 1997. Macroeconomic coordination and commercial integration in Mercosur. Texto Para Discussão no. 378. Departamento de Economia, PUC/Rio, Outubro.
8. Bevilaqua, A., Catena, M., Talvi, E., 2001. Integration, interdependence, and regional goods: an application to Mercosur. Economia 2, 153-208.
9. Caballero, R., Corbo, V., 1989. The effect of real exchange rate uncertainty on exports: empirical evidence. World Bank Econ. Rev. 3, 263-278.
10. Davidson, R., MacKinnon, J., 1993. Estimation and Inference in Econometrics. Oxford University Press.
11. Dell'Ariccia, G., 1999. Exchange rate fluctuations and trade flows: evidence from the European Union. IMF Staff Paper 46, 315-334.
12. Esfahani, H., Leaphart, S., 2000. Testing the Political Economy Models of Trade Policy: A Generalized Methodology with an Application to Turkey ...and Some New Results. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
13. Economic Commission for Latin America and Caribbean. Foreign Investment in Latin America and Caribbean. Various issues.
14. Edwards, S., 1989. Real Exchange Rates, Devaluation, and Adjustment: Exchange Rate Policy in Developing Countries. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
15. Eichengreen, B., 1988. Does Mercosur need a single currency?NBER Working Paper 6821.
16. Flôres, R., Calfat, G., Ganame, M.C., 2000. Endogenous Protection in Mercosur: an Empirical Analysis. Ensaios Econômicos da EPGE, Fundação Getulio Vargas.
17. Frankel, J., Wei, S.-J., 1993. Trade blocs and currency blocs. NBER Working Paper 4335.
18. Giambiagi, F., 1999. Mercosul: por que a união monetária faz sentido a longo prazo?Ensaios BNDES #12.
19. Giambiagi, F., Rigolon, F., 1998. Áreas Monetárias Ótimas: teoria, unificação monetária Européia e aplicações para o Mercosul.Ensaios BNDES #8.
20. Giambiagi, F., 2001. A Moeda Comum como Base do Crescimento do Brasil e da Argentina. Revista do BNDES, Dezembro.
21. Grossman, G., Helpman, E., 1994. Protection for sale. Am. Econ. Rev. 84, 833-850.
22. Gonzaga, G., Terra, M.C., 1997. Equilibrium real exchange rate, volatility, and stabilization. J. Econ. Dev. 54, 77-100.
23. Hausman, J.A., 1978. Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica 46, 1251-1271.
24. Hausman, J.A., Taylor, W.E., 1981. Panel data and unobservable individual effects. Econometrica 49, 1377-1398.
25. Hertel, T., 1997. Global Trade Analysis: Modeling and Applications. Cambridge University Press.
26. Hsiao, C., 1986. Analysis of Panel Data. Cambridge University Press, New York.
27. Inter-American Development Bank, 1999. Integration and Trade in the Americas. Periodic Note, October.
28. Inter-American Development Bank, 2000. Informe Mercosur.
29. International Monetary Fund, 2001. Brazil: selected issues and statistical appendix. Country Report no. 01/10.
30. International Monetary Fund, International Financial Statistics, Various issues.
31. Johnston, J., DiNardo, J., 1997. Econometric Methods, 4th ed. The McGraw-Hill Companies.
32. Kenen, P., Rodrick, D., 1986. Measuring and analyzing the effects of short-term volatility in real exchange rates. Rev. Econ. Stat. 68, 311-315.
33. Lael, B., Verdier, T., 1994. Lobbying and the adjustment in declining industries. Eur. Econ. Rev. 38, 586-595.
34. Magee, S., Brock, W., Young, L., 1989. Black Hole Tariffs and Endogenous Policy Theory. Cambridge University Press.
35. Maggi, G., Goldberg, P.K., 1999. Protection for sale: an empirical investigation. Am. Econ. Rev. 89, 1135-1155.
36. Maggi, G., Rodriguez-Clare, A., 2000. Import penetration and the politics of trade protection. J. Int. Econ. 51, 287-304.
37. MERCOSUR Report, Intal. Various issues (1996, 1999, 2000 and 2001).
38. Olarreaga, M., Soloaga, I., 1998. Endogenous tariff formation: the case of Mercosur. World Bank Econ. Rev. 12, 297-320.
39. Olarreaga, M., Soloaga, I., Winters, A., 1999. Whats behind Mercosur's common external tariff? World Bank Working Paper no. 2231, November.
40. Padin, D., Gonzalez, G., 1997. Argentina: preocupação com o Brasil. Conjuntura Econ. 51, 66-67.
41. Rodrik, D., 1995. Political economy of trade. Handbook of International Economics, vol. III. pp. 1457-1494.
42. Sauer, C., Bohara, A.K., 2001. Exchange rate volatility and exports: regional differences between developing and industrialized countries. Rev. Int. Stud. 9, 133-152.
43. Trefler, D., 1993. Trade liberalization and the theory of endogenous protection: an econometric study of U.S. import policy. J. Polit. Econ. 101, 138-160.
44. Urbiztondo, S., 1998. Direct foreign investment in Argentina: evolution, new challenges and perspectives. Q. Rev. Econ. Financ. 38, 459-482.
45. Valls Pereira, L., 1992. Mercosul: assinado acordo sobre produtos siderúrgicos. Conjuntura Econ. 46, 99.
46. Valls Pereira, L., 2000. Mercosul: Agenda 2000. Conjuntura Econ. 54, 53-55.