Effect of mild head injury on event-related potential correlates of Stroop task performance

Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society

Volumn 8, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 828-837

  Potter, Douglas D ^a   Jory, Susan H ^a   Bassett, Martin R A ^a   Barrett, Kenneth ^a   Mychalkiw, Wasyl ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

CHI; Closed head injury; ERP; Memory; P3; Traumatic brain injury

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CINGULATE GYRUS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COLOR; COMPUTER; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DISEASE SEVERITY; ERROR; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HEAD INJURY; HUMAN; LATENT PERIOD; LEARNING TEST; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CRANIOCEREBRAL TRAUMA; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS;

EID: 0036743143     PISSN: 13556177     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1355617702860118     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Aggleton, J.P. & Brown, M.W. (1999). Episodic memory, amnesia and the hippocampal-anterior thalamic axis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 425-456.
2. Barrett, K., Ward, A.B., Boughey, A., Jones, M., & Mychalkiw, W. (1994). Sequelae of minor head injury: The natural history of post-concussive symptoms and their relationship to loss of consciousness and follow-up. Journal of Accident and Emergency Medicine, 11, 79-84.
3. Bernstein, D.M. (1999). Recovery from mild head injury. Brain Injury, 13, 151-172.
4. Bohnen, N., Jolles, J., & Twijnstra, A. (1992a). Neuropsychological deficits in patients with persistent symptoms six months after mild head injury. Neurosurgery, 30, 692-696.
5. Bohnen, N., Twijnstra, A., & Jolles, J. (1992b). Performance in the Stroop Color Word Test in relationship to the persistence of symptoms following mild head-injury. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, 85, 116-121.
6. Bohnen, N., Twijnstra, A., & Jolles, J. (1993). Persistence of post-concussional symptoms in uncomplicated, mildly head-injured patients: A prospective cohort study. Neuropsychiatry, Neuropsychology and Behavioral Neurology, 6, 193-200.
7. Cohen, J.D., Dunbar, K., & McClelland, J.L. (1990). On the control of automatic processes: A parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. Psychological Review, 97, 332-361.
8. Corbetta, M., Akbudak, E., Conturo, T.E., Snyder, A.Z., Ollinger, J.M., Drury, H.A., Linenweber, M.R., Petersen, S.E., Raichle, M.E., Van Essen, D.C., & Shulman, G.L. (1998). A common network of functional areas for attention and eye movements. Neuron, 21, 761-773.
9. Czigler, I. & Csibra, G. (1991). Event-related potentials in a lexical Stroop task. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 11, 281-293.
10. Dehaene, S., Kerszberg, M., & Changeux, J.P. (1998). A neuronal model of a global workspace in effortful cognitive tasks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 95, 14529-14534.
11. Duncan-Johnson, C.C. & Kopell, B.S. (1981). The Stroop effect: Brain potentials localize the source of interference. Science, 214, 938-940.
12. Evans, R.W. (1992). The postconcussion syndrome and the sequelae of mild head injury. Neurologic Clinics, 10, 815-847.
13. Fisher, J.M. & Williams, A.D. (1994). Neuropsychologic investigation of mild head injury: Ensuring diagnostic accuracy in the assessment process. Seminars in Neurology, 14, 53-59.
14. 15O PET study of the Stroop and an emotional Stroop. Human Brain Mapping, 1, 194-209.
15. Grapperon, J., Vidal, F., & Leni, P. (1998). Contribution of event-related potentials to the knowledge of the Stroop test mechanisms. Neurophysiologie Clinique-Clinical Neurophysiology, 28, 207-220.
16. Jory, S.H., Potter, D.D., Bassett, M.R.A., & Barrett, K. (2000). Effect of mild head injury on event-related potential correlates of auditory selective attention. Journal of Psychophysiology, 14, 187-187.
17. Kaipio, M.L., Alho, K., Winkler, I., Escera, C., Surma-aho, O., & Naatanen, R. (1999). Event-related brain potentials reveal covert distractibility in closed head injuries. Neuroreport, 10, 2125-2129.
18. Kaipio, M.-L., Cheour, M., Ceponiene, R., Ohman, J., Alku, P., & Naatanen, R. (2000). Increased distractibility in closed head injury as revealed by event-related potentials. NeuroReport, 11, 1463-1468.
19. Kaiser, J., Barker, R., Haenschel, C., Baldeweg, T., & Gruzelier, J.H. (1997). Hypnosis and event-related potential correlates of error processing in a Stroop-type paradigm: A test of the frontal hypothesis. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 27, 215-222.
20. Kaplan, E., Fein, D., Morris, R., & Delis, D. (1991). WAIS-R as a neuropsychological instrument. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
21. King, N. (1997). Mild head injury: Neuropathology, sequelea, measurement and recovery. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 36, 161-184.
22. Larrue, V., Celsis, P., Bes, A., & Marcvergnes, J.P. (1994). The functional anatomy of attention in humans - Cerebral blood-flow changes induced by reading, naming, and the Stroop effect. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, 14, 958-962.
23. Lezak, M.D. (1995). Neuropsychological assessment (3rd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
24. Macleod, C.M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163-203.
25. Macleod, C.M. & Dunbar, K. (1988). Training and Stroop-like interference: Evidence for a continuum of automaticity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 14, 126-135.
26. Macleod, C.M. & Macdonald, P.A. (2000). Interdimensional interference in the Stroop effect: Uncovering the cognitive and neural anatomy of attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 383-391.
27. McKeown, M.J., Jung, T.P., Makeig, S., Brown, G., Kindermann, S.S., Lee, T.W., & Sejnowski, T.J. (1998). Spatially independent activity patterns in functional MRI data during the Stroop color-naming task. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 95, 803-810.
28. Nelson, H.E. (1982). The National Adult Reading Test (NART): Test manual. Windsor Berks, UK: NFER-Nelson.
29. Newcombe, F., Rabbitt, P., & Briggs, M. (1994). Minor head injury: Pathological or iatrogenic sequelae? Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 57, 709-716.
30. Nobre, A.C., Gitelman, D.R., Dias, E.C., & Mesulam, M.M. (2000). Covert visual spatial orienting and saccades: Overlapping neural systems. NeuroImage, 11, 210-216.
31. O'Toole, D.M. & Iacano, W.G. (1987). An evaluation of different techniques for removing eye-blink artifact from visual evoked response recordings. Psychophysiology, 24, 487-497.
32. Pardo, J.V, Pardo, P.J., Janer, K.W., & Raichle, M.E. (1990). The anterior cingulate cortex mediates processing selection in the Stroop attentional conflict paradigm. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA, 87, 256-259.
33. Peterson, B.S., Skudlarski, P., Gatenby, J.C., Zhang, H.P., Anderson, A.W., & Gore, J.C. (1999). An fMRI study of Stroop word-color interference: Evidence for cingulate subregions subserving multiple distributed attentional systems. Biological Psychiatry, 45, 1237-1258.
34. Petrides, M. (1998). Specialized systems for the processing of mnemonic information within the primate frontal cortex. In A.C. Roberts, T.W. Robbins, & L. Weskrantz (Eds.), The prefrontal cortex: Executive and cognitive functions (pp. 103-116). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
35. Posner, M.I. & Dehaene, S. (1994). Attentional networks. Trends in Neurosciences, 17, 75-79.
36. Posner, M.I. & Snyder, C.R.R. (1975). Attention and cognitive control. In R.L. Solso (Ed.), Information processing and cognition: The Loyola symposium (pp. 55-85). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
37. Potter, D.D. & Barrett, K. (1999). Assessment of mild head injury with ERPs and neuropsychological tasks. Journal of Psychophysiology, 13, 173-189.
38. Potter, D.D., Bassett, M.R.A., Jory, S.H., & Barrett, K. (2001a). Changes in event-related potentials in a three-stimulus auditory oddball task after mild head injury. Neuropsychologia, 39, 1464-1472
39. Potter, D.D., Jory, S.H., Basset, M.R.A., & Barrett, K. (2001b). Effects of mild head injury on auditory selective attention. Paper presented at the British Psychological Society Annual Conference, Glasgow, UK.
40. Pratap-Chand, R., Sinniah, M., & Salem, F.A. (1988). Cognitive evoked potential (P300): a metric for cerebral concussion. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, 78, 185-189.
41. Rey, A. (1964). L'examen clinique en psychologie [Clinical examination in psychology]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
42. Robbins, T.W. (1998). Dissociating executive functions of the prefrontal cortex. In A.C. Roberts, T.W. Robbins, & L. Weskrantz (Eds.), The prefrontal cortex: Executive and cognitive functions (pp. 117-130). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
43. Rolls, E.T. (1998). The orbitofrontal cortex. In A.C. Roberts, T.W. Robbins, & L. Weskrantz (Eds.), The prefrontal cortex: Executive and cognitive functions (pp. 67-86). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
44. Rugg, M.D., Cowan, C.P., Nagy, M.E., Milner, A.D., Jacobsen, I., & Brooks, D.N. (1988). Event-related potentials from closed-head injury patients in an auditory 'oddball' task: Evidence of dysfunction in stimulus categorisation. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 51, 691-698.
45. Rugg, M.D., Cowan, C.P., Nagy, M.E., Milner, A.D., Jacobson, I., & Brooks, D.N. (1989). CNV abnormalities following closed head injury. Brain, 112, 489-506.
46. Rugg, M.D., Pickles, C.D., Potter, D.D., Doyle, M.C., Pentland, B., & Roberts, R.C. (1993). Cognitive brain potentials in a three-stimulus auditory 'oddball' task after closed head injury. Neuropsychologia, 31, 373-393.
47. Semlitsch, H.V., Anderer, P., Schuster, P., & Presslich, O. (1986). A solution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artifacts, applied to the P300 ERR Psychophysiology, 23, 695-703.
48. Solbakk, A., Reinvang, I., Nielsen, C., & Sundet, K. (1999). ERP indicators of disturbed attention in mild closed head injury: A frontal lobe syndrome? Psychophysiology, 36, 802-817.
49. Smith, E.E. & Jonides, J. (1999). Neuroscience-Storage and executive processes in the frontal lobes. Science, 283, 1657-1661.
50. Spreen, O. & Strauss, E. (1991). A compendium of neuropsychological, tests. New York: Oxford University Press.
51. Taylor, S.F., Kornblum, S., Lauber, E.J., Minoshima, S., & Koeppe, R.A. (1997). Isolation of specific interference processing in the Stroop task: PET activation studies. Neuroimage, 6, 81-92.
52. Vakil, E., Weisz, H., Jedwab, L., Groswasser, Z., & Aberbuch, S. (1995). Stroop color-word tasks as a measure of selective attention - Efficiency in closed-head-injured patients. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 17, 335-342.
53. van Zomeren, A.H., Brouwer, W.H., & Deelman, B.G. (1984). Attentional deficits: The riddles of selectivity, speed, and alertness. In N. Brooks (Ed.), Closed head injury (pp. 74-107). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
54. Wechsler, D. (1981). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised manual. New York: The Psychological Corporation.
55. West, R. & Alain, C. (1999). Event-related neural activity associated with the Stroop task. Cognitive Brain Research, 8, 157-164.
56. Wylie, G. & Allport, A. (2000). Task switching and the measurement of "switch costs." Psychological Research-Psychologische Forschung, 63, 212-233.
57. Zhang, H.Z. & Kornblum, S. (1998). The effects of stimulus-response mapping and irrelevant stimulus-response and stimulus-stimulus overlap in four-choice stroop tasks with single-carrier stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance, 24, 3-19.