A chromosome-based model for estimating the number of conserved segments between pairs of species from comparative genetic maps

Genetics

Volumn 154, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 323-332

  Waddington, David ^a   Springbett, Anthea J ^a   Burt, David W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CHROMOSOMAL LOCALIZATION; CHROMOSOME ANALYSIS; DATA ANALYSIS; DNA SEQUENCE; EVOLUTION; GENE MAPPING; GENE REARRANGEMENT; GENOME; NONHUMAN; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION;

ANIMALS; CHICKENS; CHROMOSOME MAPPING; HUMANS; MICE; MODELS, GENETIC; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

ANIMALIA; AVES; GALLUS GALLUS;

EID: 0033954461     PISSN: 00166731     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. ANDERSSON, L., M. ASHBURNER, S. AUDUN, W. BARENDSE, J. BITGOOD et al., 1996 Comparative genome organization of vertebrates: the first international workshop on comparative genome organization. Mamm. Genome 7: 717-734.
2. BENGTSSON, B. O., R. KLINGA LEVAN and G. LEVAN, 1993 Measuring genome reorganization from synteny data. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 64: 198-200.
3. BURT, D. W., and H. H. CHENG, 1998 Chicken gene map. ILAR J. 39: 185-192.
4. BURT, D. W., N. BUMSTEAD, J. J. BITGOOD, F. A. PONCE DE LEON and L. B. CRITTENDEN, 1995 Chicken genome mapping: a new era in avian genetics. Trends Genet. 11: 190-194.
5. BURT, H. W., C. BRULEY, I. DUNN, C. T. JONES, A. S. LAW et al., 1999 Dynamics of chromosome evolution in birds and mammals. Nature (in press).
6. CARVER, E. A., and L. STUBBS, 1997 Zooming in on the human-mouse comparative map: genome conservation re-examined on a high-resolution scale. Genome Res. 7: 1123-1137.
7. COLLETI, D., 1991 Modelling Binary Data. Chapman and Hall, London.
8. ERLICH, J., D. SANKOFF and J. H. NADEAU, 1997 Synteny conservation and chromosome rearrangements during mammalian evolution. Genetics 147: 289-296.
9. HANNENHALLI, S., 1995 Polynomial time algorithm for computing translocation distance between genomes, pp. 162-176 in Combinational Pattern Matching, 6th Annual Sympossium, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, edited by Z. GALIL and E. UKKONEN. Springer-Verlag, New York.
10. HANNENHALLI, S., and P. A. PEVZNER, 1995 Transforming men into mice (polynomial algorithm for genomic distance problem). Proceedings of the the 36th Ann. Symposium Found. Comp. Sci., IEEE Computer Society Press, pp. 581-592.
11. JONES, C. T., D. R. MORRICE, I. R. PATON and D. W. BURT, 1997 Homologues of genes on human chromosome 15q21-q26 and a chicken microchromosome show conserved synteny and gene order. Mamm. Genome 8: 136-440.
12. KOSAMBI, D. D., 1944 The estimation of map distance from recombination values. Ann. Eugen. 12: 172-175.
13. MANLY, K. F., 1993 A Macintosh program for storage and analysis of experimental genetic mapping data. Mamm. Genome 4: 303-313.
14. MOKIZOT, D. C., 1983 Tracing linkage groups from fishes to mammals. J. Hered. 74: 413-416.
15. MORTON, N. E., 1991 Parameters of the human genome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88: 7474-7476.
16. NADEAU, J. H., and D. SANKOFF, 1998 Counting on comparative maps. Trends Genet. 14: 495-501.
17. NADEAU, J. H., and B. A. TAYLOR, 1984 Lengths of chromosomal segments conserved since divergence of man and mouse. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81: 814-818.
18. O'BRIEN, S. J., J. E. WOMACK, L. A. LYONS, K. J. MOORE, N. A. JENKINS et al., 1993 Achored reference loci for comparative genome mapping in mammals. Nat. Genet. 3: 103-112.
19. O'BRIEN, S. J., J. WIENBERG and L. A. LYONS, 1997 Comparative genomics: lessons from cats. Trends Genet. 13: 393-399.
20. PITEL, F., V. FILLON, C. HEIMEL, N. LE FUR, C. EL KHADIR-MOUNIER et al., 1998 Mapping of FASN and ACACA on two chicken microchromosomes disrupts the human 17q syntenic group well conserved in mammals. Mamm. Genome 9: 297-300.
21. PLACKETT, R. L., 1971 An Introduction to the Theory of Statistics. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.
22. POSTLFTHWATT, J. H., Y.-L. YAN, M. A. GATES, S. HORNE, A. AMORES et al., 1998 Vertebrate genome evolution and the zebrafish gene map. Nat. Genet. 18: 345-349.
23. RODIONOV, A. V., 1996 Micro versus macro: a review of structure and functions of avian micro- and macrochromosomes. Genetika 32: 597-608.
24. SANKOFF, D., 1993 Models and analyses of genomic evolution, pp. 177-183 in Supercomputing and Complex Genome Analysis, Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Bioinformatics, edited by H. A. LIM, J. W. FICKETT and C. R. CANTOR. World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., Singapore.
25. SANKOFF, D., and J. H. NADEAU, 1996 Conserved synteny as a measure of genomic distance. Discrete Appl. Math. 71: 247-257.
26. SANKOFF, D., V. FERRETTI and J. H. NADEAU, 1997a Conserved segment identification. J. Comput. Biol. 4: 559-565.
27. SANKOFF, D., M.-N. PARENT, I. MARCHAND and V. FERRETTI, 1997b On the Nadeau-Taylor theory of conserved chromosome segments, pp. 262-274 in Combinational Pattern Matching, 8th Annual Symposium, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, edited by A. APOSTOLICO and J. HEIN, Springer-Verlag, New York.
28. SMITH, E. J., and H. CHENG, 1998 Mapping chicken genes using preferential amplification of specific alleles. Microbial and comparative genomics. Genomics 30: 13-20.
29. SMITH, J., C. K. BRULEY, I. R. PATON, I. DUNN, C. T. JONES et al., 1999 Differences in gene density in the chicken macrochromosomes and microchromosomes. Anim. Genet. (in press).
30. WOMACK, J. E., and S. KATA, 1995 Bovine genome mapping: evolutionary inference and the power of comparative genomics. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 5: 725-733.
31. ZAKHAROV, I. A., V. S. NIKIFOROV and E. V. STEPANYUK, 1995 Interval estimates of the combinatorial measures of similarity for orders of homologous genes. Genetika 31: 1163-1167.