Chevron v. Echazabal: A sobering decision for environmental health research [5]

Environmental Health Perspectives

Volumn 110, Issue 9, 2002, Pages

  Lomax, Geoffrey ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MARKER; DNA MARKER;

CONTROLLED STUDY; COURT; EMPLOYMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH; GENETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY; HEREDITY; HUMAN; LETTER; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MOLECULAR GENETICS; OCCUPATIONAL DISEASE; OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH; OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK FACTOR; WORKER; WORKPLACE;

DISABLED PERSONS; ELIGIBILITY DETERMINATION; ENVIRONMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH; GENETIC MARKERS; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION TO DISEASE; HUMANS; LIVER; OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE; OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH; POLICY MAKING; PREJUDICE; RESEARCH; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 0036738785     PISSN: 00916765     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Letter

References (8)

1. Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Echzabal. Case No. 00-1406, U.S. Supreme Court, Washington, DC, 2002.
2. Natowicz MR, Alper JK, Alper JS. Genetic discrimination and the law. Am J Hum Genet 50(3):465-475 (1992).
3. Miller PS. Genetic discrimination in the workplace. J Law Med Ethics 26(3):189-197 (1998).
4. Holtzman NA, Rothstein M. Reply to Natowicz et al. [Letter] Am J Hum Genet 51:897 (1992).
5. Rothstein MA. Genetics and the Work Force of the Next Hundred Years. Columbia Business Law Review (3):371-402 (2000).
6. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Regulations to Implement the Equal Employment Provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act. 29CFR1630.2(r) (2001).
7. Echazabal v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Case No. 98-55551, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Pasadena, CA, 2000.
8. Rothstein M. Personal communication.