Contralateral sound stimulation suppresses the compound action potential from the auditory nerve in humans

Otology and Neurotology

Volumn 23, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 784-788

  Chabert, René ^a   Magnan, Jacques ^a   Lallemant, Jean Gabriel ^a   Uziel, Alain ^a   Puel, Jean Luc ^a  

^a Hopital Gaston Doumergue   (France)

Author keywords

Cochlea; Compound action potential; Contralateral sound stimulation; Medial olivocochlear efferents; Monitoring

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEAR NERVE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EFFERENT NERVE; EVOKED BRAIN STEM AUDITORY RESPONSE; FACE PAIN; HEMIFACIAL SPASM; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NERVE POTENTIAL; NOISE; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0036734841     PISSN: 15317129     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00129492-200209000-00029     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. War WB. Organisation of olivocochlear efferent systems in mammals. In: Webster DB, Popper AN, Fay RR, eds. The Anatomy of Mammalian Auditory Pathways. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer-Verlag, 1992;410-48.
2. Guinan JJ Jr. Efferent physiology. In: Dallos P, Popper AN, Alstchuler RA, eds. The Cochlea. New York: Springer, 1996;433-502.
3. Puel JL, Rebillard G. Effect of contralateral sound-stimulation on distortion products 2F1-F2: Evidence that the medial efferent system is involved. J Acoust Soc Am 1990;87:1630-5.
4. Veuillet E, Collet L, Duclaux R. Effect of contralateral auditory stimulation on active cochlear micromechanical properties in human subjects: Dependence on stimulus variables. J Physiol 1991;65:724-35.
5. Abdala C. A developmental study of distortion product otoacoustic emission (2f1-f2) suppression in humans. Hear Res 1998;121:125-38.
6. Moulin A, Collet L, Duclaux R. Contralateral auditory stimulation alters acoustic distortion products in humans. Hear Res 1993;65:193-210.
7. William D, Brown A. The effect of contralateral broad-band noise on acoustic distortion products from the human ear. Hear Res 1997;104:127-46.
8. Chiappa KH, Gladstone KJ, Young RR. Brainstem auditory evoked responses: Studies of waveform variations in 50 normal human subjects. Arch Neurol 1979;36:81-7.
9. Humes LE, Ochs MG. Use of contralateral masking in the measurement of auditory brainstem response. J Speech Hear Res 1982;25:528-35.
10. Boezeman EJF, Kapteyn TS, Visser SL, et al. Effects of contralateral and ipsilateral masking of acoustic stimulation on the latencies of auditory evoked potentials from the cochlea and brainstem. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1983;55:710-3.
11. Rosenhammer H, Holmkvist C. Will contralateral white nose interfere with the monaurally click-evoked brainstem response? Scand Audiol 1983;12:11-4.
12. Prasher DK, Cohen M. The selective effects of central masking on brainstem potentials. Br J Audiol 1984;18:79-83.
13. Dobie RA, Wilson MJ. Binaural interaction in auditory brainstem responses: Effects of masking. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1985;62:56-64.
14. Knothe J, Hofmann G. The influence of masking on the ipsi and contralateral brainstem evoked potential. Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1985;242:99-103.
15. 1 action potentials in humans: Influence of simultaneous contralateral stimulation. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1987;262-5.
16. Davis H. An active process in cochlear mechanics'? Hear Res 1983;9:79-90.
17. Dallos P. The role of outer hair cells in cochlear function. In: Correira MJ, Perachio AA, eds. Contemporary Sensory Neurobiology. New York: Alan Liss, 1985;207-330.
18. Kim DO. Active and nonlinear cochlear biomechanics and the role of outer-hair-cell subsystem in the mammalian auditory system. Hear Res 1986;22:105-14.
19. Buno W. Auditory nerve fiber activity influenced by contralateral ear sound stimulation. Exp Neurol 1978;59:62-74.
20. Murata K, Tanahashi T, Hirokawa J, et al. Mechanical and neural interactions between binaurally applied sounds in cat cochlear nerve fibers. Neurosci Lett 1980;18:289-94.
21. Liberman MC. Rapid assessment of sound-evoked olivocochlear feedback: Suppression of compound action potentials by contralateral sound. Hear Res 1989;38:47-56.
22. Warren EH, Liberman MC. Effects of contralateral sound on auditory nerve responses: I. Contributions of cochlear efferents. Hear Res 1989;37:89-104.
23. Puria S, Guinan JJ, Liberman MC. Olivocochlear reflex assays: Effects of contralateral sound on compound action potentials versus ear-canal distortion products. J Acoust Soc Am 1996;99:500-7.
24. Froehlich P. Steep and active cochlear micromechanical properties in human subjects. Hear Res 1993;66:1-7.
25. Brown MC. Morphology and response properties of single olivocochlear fibers in a guinea pig. Hear Res 1989;40:93-110.
26. Brown MC, Nuttal AL, Masta RI. Intracellular recordings from cochlear inner hair cells: Effect of stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear efferents. Science 1983;222:69-72.
27. Guinan JJ Jr, Gifford ML. Effects of electrical stimulation of efferent olivocochlear neurons on cat auditory-nerve fibers: II. Spontaneous rate. Hear Res 1988;33:115-28.
28. Probst R, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Martin GK. A review of otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 1991;89:2027-67.
29. Collet L, Kemp DL, Veuillet E, Duclaux R, Moulin A, Morgon A. Effect of contralateral auditory stimuli on active cochlear micromechanical properties in human subjects. Hear Res 1990;43:251-61.