A developmental study of distortion product otoacoustic emission (2f1- f2) suppression in humans

Hearing Research

Volumn 121, Issue 1-2, 1998, Pages 125-138

  Abdala, Carolina ^a  

^a HOUSE EAR INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Distortion product; Otoacoustic emission; Suppression; Tuning

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; COCHLEA; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISTORTION PRODUCT OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; HAIR CELL; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NEWBORN; POSTNATAL DEVELOPMENT; PREMATURITY; PRENATAL DEVELOPMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPONTANEOUS OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AUDIOMETRY; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; COCHLEA; HAIR CELLS, OUTER; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; INFANT, PREMATURE; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS, SPONTANEOUS; SOFTWARE;

EID: 0031857220     PISSN: 03785955     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-5955(98)00073-2     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Abdala C. DPOAE (2f1-f2) amplitude as a function of f2/f1 frequency ratio and primary tone level separation in human adults and neonates. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 100:1996;3726-3740.
2. Abdala C., Sininger Y. The development of cochlear frequency resolution in the human auditory system. Ear Hear. 17:1996;374-385.
3. Abdala C., Sininger Y., Ekelid M., Zeng F.-G. Distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves in human adults and neonates. Hear. Res. 98:1996;38-53.
4. Allen, J.B., 1996. Outer hair cells shift the excitation pattern via basilar membrane tension. In: Lewis, E., Long, G., Lyon, R., Narins, P., Steele, C., Hecht-Poinar, E. (Eds.), Diversity in Auditory Mechanics, World Scientific, Singapore, pp. 1-8.
5. Bargones J., Burns E. Suppression tuning curves for spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in infants and adults. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 83:1988;1809-1816.
6. Bredberg G. Cellular pattern and nerve supply of the human organ of Corti. Acta Otolaryngol., Suppl. 236:1968;1-135.
7. Brown A., Kemp D. Suppressibility of the 2f1-f2 stimulated acoustic emissions in gerbil and man. Hear. Res. 13:1984;29-37.
8. Burns, E., Arehart, K., Campbell, S., 1991. Prevalence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in neonates. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol., St. Petersburg Beach, FL, p. 219.
9. Costalupes J., Rich N., Ruggero M. Effects of excitatory and non-excitatory suppressor tones on two-tone rate suppression in auditory nerve fibers. Hear. Res. 26:1987;155-164.
10. Dallos, P., Harris, D., Relkin, E., Cheatham, M., 1980. Two-tone suppression and intermodulation distortion in the cochlea: effect of outer hair cell lesions. In: van den Brink, G., Bilsen, F. (Eds.), Psychophysical, Physiological and Behavioral Studies in Hearing, Delft University Press, Delft, pp. 242-252.
11. Dirks D., Kincaid G. Basic acoustic considerations of ear canal probe measurements. Ear. Hear. 8:(Suppl. 5):1987;60-67.
12. Eggermont J., Brown D., Ponton C., Kimberley B. Comparison of DPE and ABR traveling wave delay measurements suggests frequency specific synapse maturation. Ear Hear. 17:1996;386-394.
13. Evans E., Harrison R. Correlation between outer hair cell damage and deterioration of cochlear nerve tuning properties in the guinea pig. J. Physiol. 256:1976;43-44.
14. Fex J. Auditory activity in centrifugal and centripetal cochlear fibers in cat. A study of a feedback system. Acta Physiol. Scand. 55:1962;1-68.
15. Frank G., Kossl M. The shape of 2f1-f2 suppression tuning curves reflects basilar membrane specialization in the mustached bat, Pteronotus parnellii. Hear. Res. 83:1995;150-160.
16. Gaskill S., Brown A. Suppression of human acoustic distortion product: Dual origin of 2f1-f2. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 100:1996;3268-3274.
17. Guinan J., Warr W., Norris B. Topographic organization of the olivocochlear projections from the lateral and medial zones of the superior olivary complex. J. Comp. Neurol. 226:1984;21-27.
18. Harris R., Probst R., Xu L. Suppression of the 2f1-f2 otoacoustic emission in humans. Hear. Res. 64:1992;133-141.
19. Keefe D., Bulen J., Arehart K., Burns E. Ear-canal impedance and reflection coefficient in human infants and adults. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 94:1993;2617-2638.
20. Keefe D., Bulen J., Arehart K., Burns E. Pressure transfer function and absorption cross section from the diffuse field to the human infant ear canal. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95:1994;355-371.
21. Kiang, N., Watanabe, T., Thomas, C., Clark, L., 1965. Discharge Patterns of Single Fibers in the Cat's Auditory Nerve. Research Monograph 35. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
22. Köppl C., Manley G. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in the bobtail lizard. II. Suppression tuning characteristics. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 93:1993;2834-2843.
23. Kummer P., Janssen T., Arnold W. Suppression tuning characteristics of the 2f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emission in humans. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 98:1995;197-210.
24. Lavigne-Rebillard M., Pujol R. Surface aspects of the developing human organ of Corti. Acta Otolaryngol., Suppl. 436:1987;43-50.
25. Lavigne-Rebillard M., Pujol R. Hair cell innervation in the fetal human cochlea. Acta Otolaryngol. 105:1988;398-402.
26. Liberman M., Dodds L. Single-neuron labeling and chronic cochlear pathology. II. Stereocilia damage and alterations of threshold tuning curves. Hear. Res. 16:1984;55-74.
27. Long, G., Sun, C., Talmadge, C., 1993. Interactions between spontaneous emissions and external tones: Suppression, frequency shifting and distortion product generation. In: Duifhuis, H., Horst, J., van Kijk, P., van Netten, S. (Eds.), Biophysics of Hair Cell Sensory Systems, World Scientific, Singapore, pp. 40-47.
28. Martin G., Lonsbury-Martin B., Probst R., Scheinin S., Coats A. Acoustic distortion products in rabbit ear canal. II. Sites of origin revealed by suppression contours and pure-tone exposures. Hear. Res. 28:1987;191.
29. Mills D., Rubel E. Development of the cochlear amplifier. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 100:1996;428-441.
30. Mills D., Norton S., Rubel E. Development of active and passive mechanics in the mammalian cochlea. Aud. Neurosci. 1:1994;77-99.
31. Mountain D. Changes in endolymphatic potential and crossed olivocochlear bundle stimulation alter cochlear mechanics. Science. 210:1980;71-72.
32. Neely S., Kim D. A model for active elements in cochlear biomechanics. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 79:1986;1472-1480.
33. Norton S., Bargones J., Rubel E. Development of otoacoustic emissions in gerbil: Evidence for micromechanical changes underlying development of the place code. Hear. Res. 51:1991;73-92.
34. Pujol R., Marty R. Postnatal maturation in the cochlea of the cat. J. Comp. Neurol. 139:1970;115-126.
35. Rhode, W., 1977. Some observation son two-tone interaction measured with the Mossbauer effect. In: Evans, E., Wilson, J. (Eds.), Psychophysics and Physiology of Hearing, Academic Press, London, pp. 27-41.
36. Rhode W., Cooper N. Two-tone suppression and distortion product on the basilar membrane in the hook region of cat and guinea pig cochleae. Hear. Res. 66:1993;31-45.
37. Robles, L., Ruggero, M., Rich, N., 1989. Nonlinear interaction in the mechanical response of the cochlea to two-tone stimuli. In: Wilson, J., Kemp, D. (Eds.), Cochlear Mechanisms, Structure, Function and Models, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 369-375.
38. Ruggero M., Rich N. Furosemide alters organ of Corti mechanics: Evidence for feedback of outer hair cells upon the basilar membrane. J. Neurosci. 11:1991;1057-1067.
39. Ruggero M., Rich N., Recio A., Narayan S., Robles L. Basilar-membrane responses to tones at the base of the chinchilla cochlea. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 101:1997;2151-2163.
40. Schmiedt R., Zwislocki J., Hamernik R. Effects of hair cell lesions on responses of cochlear nerve fibers. I. Lesions, tuning curves, two tone inhibition and responses to trapezoidal-wave. J. Neurophysiol. 43:1980;1367-1389.
41. Sellick P., Russell I. Measurement of basilar membrane motion in the guinea pig using the Mossbauer technique. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 72:1982;131-141.
42. Siegel J., Kim D. Efferent neural control of cochlear mechanics? Olivocochlear bundle stimulation affects cochlear biomechanical nonlinearity. Hear. Res. 6:1982;171-182.
43. Walsh, E., McGee, J., 1997. Long-term physiological consequences of cutting olivocochlear bundle in neonatal animals. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol., St. Petersburg Beach, FL, p. 213.
44. Walsh, E., McGee, J., Song, L., Liberman, C., 1998. Consequences of neonatal OCB transection on the expression of peripheral auditory nonlinearities. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol., St. Petersburg Beach, FL, p. 214.
45. Warr B., Guinan J. Efferent innervation of the organ of Corti: two separate systems. Brain Res. 173:1979;152-155.
46. Wier C., Pasanen E., McFadden D. Partial dissociation of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and distortion products during aspirin use in humans. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 84:1988;230-237.