Principles of distributive justice used by members of the general public in the allocation of donor liver grafts for transplantation: A qualitative study

Health Expectations

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 199-209

  Wilmot, Stephen ^a   Ratcliffe, Julie ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DERBY   (United Kingdom)

^b Research Triangle Institute   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Distributive justice; Focus groups; Liver transplantation; Priorities; Public attitudes; Rationing

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ALCOHOL LIVER DISEASE; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HUMAN; JUSTICE; LIVER TRANSPLANTATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS;

EID: 0036727058     PISSN: 13696513     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Allocating donor livers: Should be given to patients most likely to benefit irrespective of the cause
2. Public involvement in health care priority setting: An overview of methods for eliciting values
3. Health care rationing: The public's debate
4. Consulting the public about health service priorities
5. Should alcoholics compete equally for liver transplantation?
6. Rationing failure: The ethical lessons of the retransplantation of scarce vital organs
7. The efficacy and equity of re-transplantation: An experimental survey of public attitudes
8. Distributing scarce livers: The moral reasoning of the general public
9. Assessing priorities for allocation of donor liver grafts: Survey of public and clinicians
10. Public preferences for the allocation of donor liver grafts for transplantation
11. Choosing who shall not be treated in the NHS
12. The utility of health at different stages in life: A quantitative approach
13. The significance of age and duration of effect in social evaluation of health care
14. Effect of discussion and deliberation on the public's views of priority setting in health care: Focus group study
15. A template approach to text analysis: Developing and using code books