Young adults' opinions of Philip Morris and its television advertising

Tobacco Control

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 236-240

  Henriksen, L ^a   Fortmann, S P ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ADVERTIZING; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; FEMALE; HEALTH EDUCATION; HUMAN; MALE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SMOKING; STUDENT; TELEVISION; TOBACCO INDUSTRY; UNITED STATES;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ADVERTISING; ATTITUDE; FEMALE; HEALTH EDUCATION; HUMANS; MALE; SAN FRANCISCO; SMOKING; STUDENTS; TELEVISION; TOBACCO INDUSTRY;

EID: 0036725227     PISSN: 09644563     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/tc.11.3.236     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Teenage Research Unlimited. Counter-tobacco advertising exploratory, summary report. Northbrook, Illinois: Teenage Research Unlimited, 1999.
2. Biener L Anti-tobacco ads by Massachusetts and Philip Morris: what teenagers think. Tobacco Control 2002;11(suppl ii)-1143-6.
3. Healton C. Who's afraid of the truth? Am J Public Health 2001;91 554-8
4. Lutz RJ. Affective and cognitive antecedents of attitude toward the ad a conceptual framework. In: Alwitt LP, Mitchell AA, eds. Psychological processes and advertising effects: theory, research, and applications. Hillsdale, New Jersey L Erlbaum Associates, 1985:45-63.
5. MacKenzie SB, Lutz RJ. An empirical examination of the structural antecedents of attitude toward the ad in an advertising pretesting context. Journal of Marketing 1989,53:48-65.
6. Goldberg ME, Hartwick J. The effects of advertiser reputation and extremity of advertising claim on advertising effectiveness Journal of Consumer Research 1990,17:172-9.
7. Emmons KM, Wechsler H, Dowdall G, et al Predictors of smoking among US college students Am J Public Health 1998;88.104-7.
8. Rigotti NA, Lee JE, Wechsler H. US college students' use of tobacco products: results of a national survey JAMA 2000;284:699-705
9. Wechsler H, Rigotti NA, Gledhill-Hoyt J, et al. Increased levels of cigarette use among college students a cause for national concern. JAMA 1998;280 1673-8.
10. RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company. Camel advertising development "white paper". RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company Online Litigation Document Archive 1987 Accessed 27 February 1998 Document No 506742179-2188. URL: http.//www.rjrtdocs.com/rjrtdocs/
11. Sepe E, Glantz SA. Bar and club tobacco promotions in the alternative press Targeting young adults. Am J Public Health 2002;92:75-8.
12. Fox KFA The measurement of issue/advocacy advertising effects. In: Leigh J, Martin CR, eds. Current issues and research in advertising Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Business School, 1986.
13. Holey E. Exploring the construct of organization as source: consumers' understandings of organizational sponsorship of advocacy advertising. Journal of Advertising 1996,25.19-36
14. Austin EW, Pinkleton B, Fujioka Y Assessing prosocial message effectiveness: effects of message quality, production quality, and persuasiveness Journal of Health Communication 1999;4.195-210.
15. Hammond SL. Health advertising: the credibility of organizational sources. In: McLaughlin M, ed. Communication yearbook 10. Newbury Pork, California. Sage Publications, 1987
16. National Association of Attorneys General. Master settlement agreement: proposed settlement of state cases, section VI (h), 1998 December 8