|
Volumn 122, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 242-250
|
Comparative bond strength of brackets cured using a pulsed xenon curing light with 2 different light-guide sizes
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ADHESIVE AGENT;
HALOGEN;
RESIN;
SILICON DIOXIDE;
TUNGSTEN;
XENON;
ACRYLIC ACID RESIN;
BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE;
RELIANCE LIGHT BOND;
RESIN CEMENT;
TRANSBOND;
ANIMAL TISSUE;
ARTICLE;
CHEMICAL BOND;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
COW;
ENAMEL;
ENERGY;
LIGHT;
NONHUMAN;
ORTHODONTIC DEVICE;
ORTHODONTICS;
SHEAR STRENGTH;
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE;
ANIMAL;
CATTLE;
CHEMISTRY;
DENTAL ACID ETCHING;
DENTAL BONDING;
EQUIPMENT DESIGN;
ILLUMINATION;
INSTRUMENTATION;
MECHANICAL STRESS;
NONPARAMETRIC TEST;
SPECTROPHOTOMETRY;
STATISTICS;
SURFACE PROPERTY;
TIME;
ULTRASTRUCTURE;
ACID ETCHING, DENTAL;
ACRYLIC RESINS;
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE;
ANIMALS;
BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE;
CATTLE;
COMPOSITE RESINS;
DENTAL BONDING;
DENTAL ENAMEL;
EQUIPMENT DESIGN;
HALOGENS;
LIGHTING;
ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS;
QUARTZ;
RESIN CEMENTS;
SPECTROPHOTOMETRY;
STATISTICS;
STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;
STRESS, MECHANICAL;
SURFACE PROPERTIES;
TIME FACTORS;
TUNGSTEN;
XENON;
|
EID: 0036717182
PISSN: 08895406
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1067/mod.2002.126728 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (18)
|
References (20)
|