Occupational relevance of positive standard patch-test results in employed persons with an initial report of an occupational skin disease

International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health

Volumn 75, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 423-434

  Dickel, H ^a   Kuss, O ^a   Schmidt, A ^b   Diepgen, T L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^b Department of Occupational Medicine ^*  (Germany)

Author keywords

BKH N; Occupational relevance; Occupational skin disease; Patch testing; Standard series

Indexed keywords

ALLERGEN; BALSAM PERU; BENZOCAINE; COBALT CHLORIDE; DICHROMATE POTASSIUM; DISULFIRAM; EPOXY RESIN; FORMALDEHYDE; FRAGRANCE; ISOTHIAZOLE DERIVATIVE; LANOLIN ALCOHOL; MERCAPTOBENZOTHIAZOLE; MERCURIC CHLORIDE; NEOMYCIN; NICKEL SULFATE; PHENYLENEDIAMINE; ROSIN;

ARTICLE; ATOPIC DERMATITIS; DELAYED HYPERSENSITIVITY; DERMATITIS; EMPLOYEE; FEMALE; GERMANY; HEALTH INSURANCE; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HUMAN; INDUSTRIAL WORKER; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OCCUPATION; OCCUPATIONAL SKIN DISEASE; PATCH TEST; REGISTER; SCREENING TEST; SENSITIZATION; STANDARD;

ADULT; ALLERGENS; DERMATITIS, CONTACT; FEMALE; GERMANY; HUMANS; INDUSTRY; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; OCCUPATIONAL DISEASES; OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE; OCCUPATIONS; PATCH TESTS; REGISTRIES; RISK ASSESSMENT;

MYROXYLON BALSAMUM PEREIRAE;

EID: 0036705618     PISSN: 03400131     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00420-002-0328-2     Document Type: Article

References (128)

1. Aberer W, Reiter E, Gailhofer G (1990) Pitfalls in patch testing: Problems with rather than from Kathon CG. Contact Dermatitis 23:380-381
2. Adams RM, Maibach HI (1985) A five-year study of cosmetic reactions. J Am Acad Dermatol 13:1062-1069
3. Adams RM, Fisher AA (1986) Contact allergen alternatives: J Am Acad Dermatol 14:951-969
4. Akermann S (1990) [Performance spectrum in occupational disability. Causes - Occupational groups - Age - Duration of insurance]. Versicherungsmedizin 42:184-190
5. Andersen KE, Veien NK (1985) Biocide patch tests. Contact Dermatitis 12:99-103
6. Andersen KE, Burrows D, White IR (1992) Allergens from the standard series. In: Rycroft RJG, Menné T, Frosch PJ, Benezra C (eds) Textbook of Contact Dermatitis. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 415-456
7. Avnstorp C (1992) Cement eczema. An epidemiological intervention study. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 179:1-22
8. Belsito DV (2000) Rubber. In: Kanerva L, Elsner P, Wahlberg JE, Maibach HI (eds) Handbook of Occupational Dermatology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Barcelona Hong Kong London Milan Paris Singapore Tokyo, pp 701-718 pp 701-718
9. Bircher AJ (2000) Pharmaceutical drug allergens. In: Kanerva L, Eslner P, Wahlberg JE, Maibach HI (eds) Handbook of Occupational Dermatology. Berlin Heidelberg New York Barcelona Hong Kong London Milan Paris Singapore Tokyo, pp 479-489
10. Björkner B (1992) Plastic materials. In: Rycroft RJG, Menné T, Frosch PJ, Benezra C (eds) Textbook of Contact Dermatitis. Springer, Berlin Heiderg, pp 539-572
11. Blaschko A (1889) Die Berufsdermatosen der Arbeiter. Ein Beitrag zur Gewerbehygiene. I. Das Galvaniseur-Ekzem. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 15:925-927
12. Brasch J, Geier J, Gefeller O (1996) Dynamic patterns of allergic patch test reactions to 10 European standard allergens. An analysis of data recorded by the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK). Contact Dermatitis 35:17-22
13. Brasch J, Geier J, Schnuch A (1998) Differenzierte Kontakt-Allergenlisten dienen der Qualitätsverbesserung. Hautarzt 49:184-191
14. Brehler R, Hellweg B (1995) Beurteilung von Epikutantestreaktionen nach Empfehlungen der Deutschen Kontaktallergie-Gruppe. Dt Derm 43:688-690
15. Burrows D (2000) Chromium. In: Kanerva L, Elsner P, Wahlberg JE, Maibach HI (eds) Handbook of Occupational Dermatology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Barcelona Hong Kong London Milan Paris Singapore Tokyo, pp 534-540
16. Cockayne SE, Murphy R, Gawkrodger DJ (2001) Occupational contact dermatitis from colophonium in a dental technician. Contact Dermatitis 44:42-43
17. Conde-Salazar L, Del-Río E, Guimaraens D, Domingo AG (1993) Type IV allergy to rubber additives: A 10-year study of 686 cases. J Am Acad Dermatol 29:176-180
18. Corazza M, Mantovani L, Bacilieri S, Virgili A (2001) A child with 'occupational' contact dermatitis due to MCI/MI. Contact Dermatitits 44:53-54
19. De Groot AC (1990) Methylisothiazolinone/methylchloroisothiazolinone (Kathon CG) allergy: An updated review. Am J Contact Dermatitis 1:151-156
20. De Groot AC (2000) Fragrances. In: Kanerva L, Elsner P, Wahlberg JE, Maibach HI (eds) Handbook of Occupational Dermatology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Barcelona Hong Kong London Milan Paris Singapore Tokyo, pp 497-508
21. De Groot AC, White IR (1992) Cosmetics and skin care products. In: Rycroft RJG, Menné RT, Frosch PJ, Benezra C (eds) Textbook of Contact Dermatitis. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 459-475
22. De Groot AC, Liem DH, Weyland JW (1985) Kathon CG: Cosmetic allergy and patch test sensitization. Contact Dermatitis 12:76-80
23. Dickel H (1996) Implementierung eines relationalen Datenbanksystems in der Universitäts-Hautklinik Köln mit Auswertung einer bikontinentalen Multizenterstudie - BAER-Studie - zur Frage der Allergenhäufigkeit bei Kontaktallergien. Medizinische Dissertation Medizinische Fakultät der Rheinisch-Westfälischen Technischen Hochschule Aachen
24. Dickel H, Kuss O, Blesius CR, Schmidt A, Diepgen TL (2001) Report from the register of occupational skin diseases in Northern Bavaria (BKH-N). Contact Dermatitis 44:258-259
25. Dickel H, Kuss O, Blesius CR, Schmidt A, Diepgen TL (2001) Occupational skin diseases in Northern Bavaria between 1990 and 1992: A population-based study. Br J Dermatol 145:453-462
26. Diepgen TL, Coenraads PJ (1999) The epidemiology of occupational contact dermatitis. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 72:496-506
27. Diepgen TL, Coenraads PJ (2000) Sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value of patch testing: The more you test, the more you get? Contact Dermatitis 42:315-317
28. Diepgen TL, Drexler H (2000) Nickel und seine arbeitsmedizinische Bedeutung als Allergen. Arbeitsmed Sozialmed Umweltmed 35:136-145
29. Eberhartinger C (1984) Beobachtung zur Häufigkeit von Kontaktallergien. Z Hautkr 59:1283-1289
30. Eiermann HJ, Larsen W, Maibach HI, Taylor JS (1982) Prospective study of cosmetic reactions: 1977-1980. J Am Acad Dermatol 6:909-917
31. Estlander T, Jolanki R, Kanerva L (2000) Paints, lacquers and varnishes. In: Kanerva L, Elsner P, Wahlberg JE, Maibach HI (eds) Handbook of Occupational Dermatology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Barcelona Hong Kong London Milan Paris Singapore Tokyo, pp 662-678
32. Estlander T, Jolanki R, Kanerva L (2000) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from trivalent chromium in leather tanning. Contact Dermatitis 43:114
33. Farm G (1998) Contact allergy to colophony. Clinical and experimental studies with emphasis on clinical relevance. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 201:1-42
34. Fischer T (2000) Hard metal. In: Kanerva L, Elsner P, Wahlberg JE, Maibach HI (eds) Handbook of Occupational Dermatology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Barcelona Hong Kong London Milan Paris Singapore Tokyo, pp 541 543
35. Fischer T, Maibach HI (1986) Patch testing in allergic contact dermatitis: An update. Semin Dermatol 5:214-224
36. Fisher AA (1986) Contact Dermatitis. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, p 954
37. Flyvholm MA (1991) Contact allergens in registered chemical products. Contact Dermatitis 25:49-56
38. Flyvholm MA (1997) Formaldehyde exposure at the workplace and in the environment. Allergologie 20:225-231
39. Flyvholm MA (2000) Computerised product database. Registered chemical contact allergens. Handbook of Occupational Dermatology. pp 451-461
40. Flyvholm MA, Menné T (1992) Allergic contact dermatitis from formaldehyde: A case study focussing on sources of formaldehyde exposure. Contact Dermatitis 27:27-36
41. Foulds IS (2000) Cutting fluids. In: Kanerva L, Elsner P, Wahlberg JE, Maibach HI (eds) Handbook of Occupational Dermatology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Barcelona Hong Kong London Milan Paris Singapore Tokyo, pp 691-700
42. Fransway AF (1991) The problem of preservation in the 1990s: I. Statement of the problem, solution(s) of the industry, and the current use of formaldehyde and formaldehyde-releasing biocides. Am J Contact Dermatitis 2:6-23
43. Fransway AF, Schmitz NA (1991) The problem of preservation in the 1990s: II. Formaldehyde and formaldehyde-releasing biocides: Incidences of cross-reactivity and the significance of the positive response to formaldehyde. Am J Contact Dermatitis 2:78-88
44. Freeman S (1990) Fragrance and nickel: Old allergens in new guises. Am J Contact Dermatitis 1:47-52
45. Fregert S (1981) Manual of Contact Dermatitis. Munksgaard, Copenhagen
46. Fregert S, Bandmann HJ (1975) Patch Testing. Springer, New York Heidelberg Berlin, p 78
47. Frosch PJ, im Namen der Deutschen Kontaktallergiegruppe (1990) Aktuelle Kontaktallergene. Hautarzt 41:129-133
48. Gailhofer G, Ludvan M (1987) Zur Änderung des Allergen-Spektrums bei Kontaktekzemen in den Jahren 1975-1984. Dermatosen 35:12-15
49. Gebhardt M, Elsner P (2000) Adhesives and glues. In: Kanerva L, Elsner P, Wahlberg JE, Maibach HI (eds) Handbook of Occupational Dermatology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Barcelona Hong Kong London Milan Paris Singapore Tokyo, pp 644-649
50. Geier J (2000) Leather and shoes. In: Kanerva L, Elsner P, Wahlberg JE, Maibach HI (eds) Handbook of Occupational Dermatology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Barcelona Hong Kong London Milan Paris Singapore Tokyo, pp 637-643
51. Geier J, Schnuch A (1994) Kontaktallergene bei Dentalberufen. Dermatosen 42:253-255
52. Geier J, Schnuch A (1995) A comparison of contact allergies among construction and nonconstruction workers attending contact dermatitis clinics in Germany: Results of the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology from November 1989 to July 1993. Am J Contact Dermatitis 6:86-94
53. Geier J, Struppek K (1995) Anamnese-Auxilium für die berufsdermatologische Untersuchung von Maurern, Betonbauern, Fliesenlegern und Angehörigen verwandter Berufe. Dermatosen 43:75-80
54. Geier J, Schnuch A (1998) Dermatosen 46:109-114
55. Geier J, Lessmann H, Schnuch A, Fuchs T (1997) Kontaktallergien durch formaldehydabspaltende Biozide. Eine Analyse der Daten des IVDK aus den Jahren 1992 bis 1995. Allergologie 20:215-224
56. Geier J, Lessmann H, Schumacher T, Eckert C, Becker D, Boveleth W, Buss M, Eck E, Englitz HG, Koch P, Müller J, Nöring R, Rocker M, Rothe A, Schmidt A, Uter W, Warfolomeow I, Zoellner G (2000) Vorschlag für die Epikutantestung bei Verdacht auf Kontaktallergie durch Kühlschmierstoffe: 1. Kommerziell erhältliche Testsubstanzen. Dermatol Beruf Umwelt 48:232-236
57. Geier J, Schnuch A, Frosch PJ (2000) Contact allergy to dichromate in women. Dermatosen 48:4-10
58. Goon ATJ, Goh CL (2000) Epidemiology of occupational skin disease in Singapore 1989-1998. Contact Dermatitis 43:133-136
59. Hammershoy O (1980) Standard patch test results in 3,255 consecutive Danish patients from 1973 to 1977. Contact Dermatitis 6:263-268
60. Handley J, Todd D, Burrows D (1993) Mercury allergy in a contact dermatitis clinic in Northern Ireland. Contact Dermatitis 29:258-261
61. Hayakawa R, Ogino Y, Suzuki M, Kaniwa M (1994) Allergic contact dermatitis from para-tertiary-butylphenol-formaldehyde resin (PTBP-F-R). Contact Dermatitis 30:187-189
62. Holness DL, Nethercott JR (1992) Results of testing with epoxy resin in an occupational health clinic population. Am J Contact Dermatitis 3:169-174
63. Huygens S, Goossens A (2001) An update on airborne contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 44:1-6
64. Jolanki R (1991) Occupational skin diseases from epoxy compounds: Epoxy resin compounds, epoxy acrylates and 2,3-epoxypropyltrimethyl ammonium chloride. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 1-80
65. Jolanki R, Kanerva L, Estlander T, Tarvainen K, Keskinen H, Henriks-Eckerman ML (1990) Occupational dermatoses from epoxy resin compounds. Contact Dermatitis 23:172-183
66. Jolanki R, Estlander R, Kanerva L (2001) 182 patients with occupational allergic epoxy contact dermatitis over 22 years. Contact Dermatitis 44:121-123
67. Kanerva L, Jolanki R, Estlander T, Alanko K, Savela A (2000) Incidence rates of occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by metals. Am J Contact Dermatitis 11:155-160
68. Kaniwa MA, Isama K, Nakamura A, Kantoh H, Itoh M, Ichikawa M, Hayakawa R (1994) Identification of causative chemicals of allergic contact dermatitis using a combination of patch testing in patients and chemical analysis. Application to cases industrial rubber products. Contact Dermatitis 30:20-25
69. Karlberg AT (2000) Colophony. In: Kanerva L, Elsner P, Wahlberg JE, Maibach HI (eds) Handbook of Occupational Dermatology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Barcelona Hong Kong London Milan Paris Singapore Tokyo, pp 509-516
70. Kiec-Swierczynska M (1993) Contact allerlgy caused by formaldehyde, based on materials from the Institute for Medical Occupations on Lodz. Med Pr 44:209-213
71. Kiec-Swierczynska M (1995) Allergy to epoxy compounds over a decade. Contact Dermatitis 32:180
72. Kiec-Swierczynska M (1995) Occupational sensitivity to rubber. Contact Dermatitis 32:171-172
73. Kuhlwein A, Hausen BM (1982) Standardepikutantestung: Statistische Auswertung aus fünf Jahren. Z Hauktr 57:1179-1186
74. Lachapelle JM (1997) A proposed relevance scoring system for positive allergic patch test reactions: Practical implications and limitations. Contact Dermatitis 36:39-43
75. Larsen WG, Adams RM, Maibach HI (1992) Color Test of Contact Dermatitis. Saunders, Philadelphia, 238
76. Lidé C (1994) Cold-impregnated aluminium: A new course of nickel exposure. Contact Dermatitis 31:22-24
77. Lidén C (1994) Occupational contact dermatitis due to nickel allergy. Sci Total Environ 148:283-285
78. Lidén C, Johnson S (2001) Nickel on the Swedish market before the Nickel Directive. Contact Dermatitis 44:7-12.
79. Lidén C, Röndell E, Skare L, Nalbanti A (1998) Nickel release from tools on the Swedish market. Contact Dermatitis 39:127-131
80. Lim JTE, Goh CL, Ng SK, Wong WK (1992) Changing trends in epidemiology of contact dermatitis in Singapore. Contact Dermatitis 26:321-326
81. Madden SD, Thiboutot DM, Marks JG (1994) Occupationally induced allergic contact dermatitis to methylchloroisothiazoline/methylisothiazolinone among mechinists. J Am Acad Dermatol 30:272-274
82. Marks JG Jr, DeLeo VA (1992) Contact andn Occupational Dermatology. Mosby-Year Book, St Louis, p 346
83. Marks JG, Jr, Belsito DV, DeLeo VA, Fowler JF Jr, Fransway AF, Maibach HI, Mathias CGT, Nethercott JR, Rietschel RL, Sheretz EF, Storrs FJ, Taylor JS (1998) North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch test result for the detection of delayed-type hypersensitivity to topical allergens. J Am Acad Dermatol 38:911-918
84. Marrakchi S, Maibach HI (1994) What is occupational contact dermatitis? An operational definition. Dermatol Clin 12:477-484
85. Marzulli FN, Maibach HI (1986) Predictive testing in humans for contaact allergy. In: Fisher AA (ed) Contact Dermatitis. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, pp 30-45
86. McAlvany JP, Sherertz EF (1994) Contact dermatitis in infants, children, and adolescents. Adv Dermatol 9:205-224
87. McDonagh AJG, Wright AL, Cork MJ, Gawkrodger DJ (1992) Nickel sensitivity: The influence of ear piercing and atopy. Br J Dermatol 126:16-18
88. Meding B (2000) Differences between the sexes with regard to work-related skin disease. Contact Dermatitis 43:65-71
89. Menné T, White IR, Bruynzeel DP, Dooms-Goossens A (1992) Patch test reactivity to the PPD-black-rubber-mix (industrial rubber chemicals) and individual ingredients. Contact Dermatitis 26:354
90. Merck Sharp and Dohme Research Laboratories (1989) The Merck Index: An encyclopedia of chemicals, drugs, and biological (centennial edn). Merck, Rahway, New Jersey, p, 1606
91. Nakada T, Hostynek JJ, Maibach HI (2000) Use tests: ROAT (repeated open application test)/PUT (provocative use test): an overview. Contact Dermatitis 43:1-3
92. Nethercott JR, Holness DL (1990) Cutaneous nickel sensitivity in Toronto, Canada, J Am Acad Dermatol 22:756-761
93. Nethercott JR, Holness DL, Adams RM, Belsito DV, De Leo VA, Emmett EA, Fowler J, Fisher AA, Larsen W, Maibach H, Marks J, Mitchell J, Rietschel R, Rosenthal L, Schorr W, Storrs F, Taylor JS (1991) Patch testing with a routine screening tray in North America, 1985 through 1989: II. Gender and response. Am J Contact Dermatitis 2:130-134
94. Nethercott JR, Holnes DL, Adams RM, Belsito DV, De Leo VA, Emmett EA, Fowler J, Fisher AA, Larsen WG, Maibach HI, Marks J, Rietschel RL, Rosenthal L, Storrs WF, Taylor JS (1991) Patch testing with a routine screening tray in North America, 1987 through 1989: IV. Occupation and response. Am J Contact Dermatitis 2:247-254
95. Nethercott JR, Holness DL, Adams RM, Belsito DV, De Leo VA, Emmett EA, Fowler JF Jr, Rietschel RL, Rosenthal L, Schorr W, Storrs FJ, Taylor JS (1994) Multivariate analysis of the effect of selected factors on the elicitation of patch test response to 28 common environmental contactans in North America. Am J Contact Dermatitis 5:13-18
96. North American Contact Dermatitis Group (1984) Patch Testing in Allergic Contact Dermatitis. American Academy of Dermatology, Evanston, Ellinois, p 24
97. Perrenoud D, Bircher A, Hunziker T, Suter H, Bruckner-Tuderman L, Stäger J, Thürlimann W, Schmid P, Suard A, Hunziker N (1994) Frequency of sensitization to 13 common preservatives in Switzerland. Contact Dermatitis 30:276-279
98. Peters KP, Frosch PJ, Uter W, Schnuch A, Arnold R, Bahmer FA, Brasch J, Diepgen TL, Enders F, Fuchs T, Henseler T, Müller S, Przybilla B, Schulze-Dirks A, Stary A,Zimmersmann J (1994) Typ-Allergien auf friseurberufesstoffe: Ergebnisse einer multizentrischen Studies in acht Kliniken der Deutschen Kontaktallergiegruppe und des 'Informationsverbundes Dermatologischer Kliniken' Deutschland. Dermatosen 42:50-57
99. Pilz B, Frosch PJ (1995) Kontaktallergene 1994 In: Plewig G, Kortin HC (eds) Fortschritte der Praktischen Dermatologie und Venerologie. Springer, Heidelberg New York pp 7-14
100. Richter G. (199) Epidemiologie berufsbedingter Dermatosen in Sachse. Allergologie 17:90-93
101. Rietschel RL, Fowler JF Jr (1995) Fisher's Contact Dermatitis. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore Philadelphia Hong Kong London Munich Sydney Tokyo, p 1117
102. Rietschel RL, Mathias CG, Taylor JS, Storrs FJ, Sherertz EF, Pratt M, Marks JGJ, Maibach HI, Fransway AF, Fowler JFJ, DeLeo VA, Belsito DV (2001) A preliminary report of the occupation of patients evaluated in patch test clinics. Am J Contact Dermatitis 12:72-76
103. HERMAL Kurt Herrman, Reinbek B, Hamburg,
104. Roos TC, Merk HF (2001) Allergic contact dermatitis from benzocaine ointment during treatment of herpes zoster. Contact Dermatitis 44:104
105. Rustemeyer T, Pilz B, Fosch PJ (1994) Kontaktallergien in medizinischen Berufen. Hautarzt 45:834-844
106. Sánchez-Pérez J, López MP, De Vega Haro MJM, García-Díez A (2001) Allergic contact dermatitis from gentamicin in eyedrops, with cross-reactivity to kanamycin but not neomycin. Contact Dermatitis 44:54
107. Schmidt A, Kühl M, Diepgen TL (2000) [The impact of type IV allerlgy on compensation of occupational contact dermatitis]. Dermatol Beruf Umwelt 48:215-221
108. Schnuch A, Geier J (1997) Formaldehydallergie: Aktuelle Trends im internationalen Vergleich. Auswertungen der IVDK-Daten der Jahre 1992-1995. Allergologie 20:205-214
109. Schnuch A, Geier J, Uter W, Frosch PJ, Lehmacher W, Aberer W, Agathos M, Arnold R, Fuchs T, Laubstein B, Lischka G, Pietrzyk PM, Rakoski J, Richter G, Rueff F (1997) National rates and regional differences in sensitization to allergens of the standard series. Population-adjusted frequencies of sensitization (PAFS) in 40,000 patients from a multicenter study (IVDK). Contact Dermatitis 37:200-209
110. Schnuch A, Uter W, Geier J, Frosch PJ, Rustemeyer T (1998) Contact allergies in healthcare workers. Results from the IVDK. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 78:358-363
111. Schubert H, Berova N, Hegyi E, Jirasek L, Kalensky J, Korossy S, Michailov P, Nebenführer L, Prater E, Rothe A, Rudzki E, Temesvari E, Ziegler V, Zschunke E (1982) Das allergische Kontaktekzem: Analyse einer Stichprobe in fünf sozialistischen Ländern Europas. Dermatol Monatsschr 168:613-623
112. Seidenari S, Mantovani L, Manzini BM, Pignatti M (1997) Cross-sensitizations between azo dyes and para-amino compound: A study of 236 azo-dye-sensitive subjects. Contact Dermatitis 36:91-96
113. Smith HR, Wakelin SH, McFadden JP, Rycroft RJ, White IR (1999) A 15-year review of our MOAHLFA index. Contact Dermatitis 40:227-228
114. Storrs FJ, Rosenthal LE, Adams RM, Clendenning W, Emmett EA, Fisher AA, Larsen WG, Maibach HI, Rietschel RL, Schorr WF, Taylor JS (1989) Prevalence and relevance of allergic reactions in patients patch tested in North America - 1984 to 1985. J Am Acad Dermatol 20:1038-1045
115. Stransky L, Krasteva M (1989) Changing patterns of contact sensitivity in Sofia. Dermatosen 37:214-216
116. Tarvainen K (1995) Analysis of patients with allergic patch test reactions to a plastics and glues series. Contact Dermatitis 32:346-351
117. Taylor JS (1928) Occupational dermatoses. In: Alderman MH, Hanley MJ (eds) Clinical Medicine for the Occupational Physician. Marcel Dekker, New York Basel, pp 299-344
118. Taylor JS (1986) Rubber In: Fisher AA (ed) Contact Dermatitis. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, pp 603-643
119. Taylor JS (1986) Adhesives, gums and resins. In: Fisher AA (ed) Contact Dermatitis. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, pp 644-674
120. Thamm H (1997) Formaldehyd und Formaldehydabspalter in Kühlschmierstoffen: Aktueller Stand. Allergologie 20:232-238
121. Tucker SC, English JSC (2000) The electronics industry In: Kanerva L, Elsner P, Wahlberg JE, Maibach HI (eds) Handbook of Occupational Dermatology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Barcelona Hong Kong London Milan Paris Singapore Tokyo, pp 650-661
122. Uter W, Geier J, Shnuch A (2000) Current pattern and trends in sensitization to hairdressers allergens in Germany. Dermatol Beruf Umwelt 48:55-59
123. Uter W, Lessmann H, Schwanitz HJ (2000) Glyoxal is an important allergen for medical cleaning staff. (P 040). Contact Dermatitis 42:65
124. Von Hintzenstern J, Heese A, Koch HU, Peters KP, Hornstein OP (1991) Frequenct, spectrum and occupational relevance of type IV allergies to rubber chemicals. Contact Dermatitis 24:244-252
125. Wahlberg JE (1992) Patch testing. In: Rycroft RJG, Menné T, Frosch PJ, Benezra (eds) Textbook of Contact Dermatitis. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 239-268
126. Wahlberg JE, Liden C (2000) Cross-reactivity patterns of cobalt and nickel studied with repeated open applications (ROATS) to the skin of guinea pigs. Am J Contact Dermatitis 11:42-48
127. Young E, Van Weelden H, Van Osch L (1988) Age and sex distribution of the incidence of contact sensitivity to standard allergens. Contact Dermatitis 19:307-308
128. Zimerson E, Bruze M (2000) Contact allergy to phenol-formaldehyde resins. In: Kanerva L, Elsner P, Wahlberg JE, Maibach HI (eds) Handbook of Occupational Dermatology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Barcelona Hong Kong London Milan Paris Singapore Tokyo, pp 591-596