Quality of life profile: From measurement to clinical application

Breast

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 324-334

  Albert, U S ^a   Koller, M ^b   Lorenz, W ^b   Kopp, I ^a   Heitmann, C ^a   Stinner, B ^b   Rothmund, M ^b   Schulz, K D ^a  

^a Department of Visceral ^*  (Germany)

^b PHILIPPS UNIVERSITY MARBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER PATIENT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; METHODOLOGY; PATIENT CARE; PHYSICIAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUALITY OF LIFE; RECTUM CANCER;

EID: 0036700166     PISSN: 09609776     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1054/brst.2002.0419     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Arbeitsgemeinschaft Bevölkerungsbezogener Krebsregister in Deutschland Krebs in Deutschland, Saarland, 1999.
2. Bailar III J C, Gomik H L. Cancer undefeated. N Engl J Med 1997; 336: 1569.
3. Levi F, Lucchini F, La Vecchia C, Negri E. Trends in mortality from cancer in the European Union, 1955-194. Lancet 1999; 354: 742.
4. Sporn M B. The war on cancer. Lancet 1996; 347: 1377.
5. Hellriegel K P, Schulz K D. Nachsorge bei Mammakarzinom-Patientinnen. Empfehlungen einer Konsensus-Tagung. Forum DKG 1995; 10: 272.
6. Lorenz W, Troidl H, Solomkin J S, Nies C et al. Second step: testing-outcome measurements. World J Surg 1999; 23: 768.
7. Lorenz W. Outcome: definition and methods of evaluation. In: Troidl H, McKneally M F, Mulder D S, Wechsler A S et al. eds. Surgical Research. Basic Principles and Clinical Practice, 3rd Edition. New York: Springer, 1998; 513.
8. Troidl H. Lebensqualität: ein relevates Zielkriterium in der Chirurgie. Chirurg 1979; 60: 445.
9. Aaronson N K, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M et al. The European organization for research and treatment of cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993; 85: 365.
10. Boulding K E. General system theory: the skeleton of science. In: Buckley W ed. Modern Systems Research for the Behavioral Sciences. Chicago: Aldine, 1968; S3.
11. Koller M, Kußmann J, Lorenz W, Rothmund M. Die Messung der Lebensqualität in der chirugischen Tumornachsorge Methoden, Probleme und Einsatzmöglichkeiten. Chirurg 1994; 65: 333-339.
12. McLachlan S A, Devin G M, Godwin P J. Validation of the EORTC QLQ C30 as a measure of psychosocial function in breast cancer patients. Eur J Cancer 1998; 34: 510.
13. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. GDC guidelines: improving the quality. GA, Atlanta, 1996; S110.
14. Lewin K. Feldtheorie in den Sozialwissenschaften. Bern: Huber, 1963.
15. Rogers E M. Innovativeness and adopter categories. In: Rogers E M ed. Diffusion of Innovations. San Francisco: Free Press, 1995.
16. Cretin S. Putting clinical guidelines into practice In: Margolis C Z, Cretin S. eds. Implementing Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chicago: AHA Press, 1999; S99.
17. Eagly A H, Chaiken S. The Psychology of Attitudes. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishing, 1993.
18. Prochaska J O, DiClemente C C, Norcross J C. In search of how people change. Am Psychol 1992; 47: 1102.
19. Gross P A, Greefield S, Cretin S, Ferguson J, Grimshaw J, Grol R, Klazinga N, Lorenz W, Meyer G S, Riccobono C, Schoenbaum S C, Schyve P, Shaw C. Optimal methods for guideline implementation: conclusion from Leeds Castle meeting. Med Care 2001; 35 (8 Suppl 2): II 85-92.
20. Kopp I, Koller M, Stinner B, Hainbach S, Rothmund M, Lorenz W. Chirurgische Therapie des Rektumkarzinoms: Abbildung der realen Versorgungssituation im Rahmen einer kreisbezogenen Qualitätssicherungs-Studie. Chirurg 2001; 72:1467-1477.
21. Lorenz W, Schulz K D, Rothmund M, Koller M, Bastian U. Feldstudie zur regionalen Versorgung von Tumorpatienten mit Mamma- und Rektumkarzinom unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Lebensqualität. Zwischenbericht zum 30.05.1997 an das Bundesministerium für Gesundheit. Marburg: Klinikum der Philipps-Universität, 1997.
22. Quirke B. Internal communication. In: Hart ed. Strategic Public Relations. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1995; 78.
23. Fayers P, Aaronson N, Bjordal K, Curran D, Groenvold M. EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual, 2nd Edition. Brussels: EORTC Study Group on Quality of Life, 1999.
24. Koller M, Lorenz W. Quality of life research in patients with rectal cancer: traditional approaches versus a problem-solving oriented perspective. Langenbeck's Arch Surg 1998; 383: 427.
25. Bühl A, Zöfel P. SPSS für Windows Version 6.1: Praxisorientierte Einführung in die moderne Datenanalyse, 3. Auflage. Bonn: Addison-Wesley-Longman, 1996.
26. Koller M, Kussmann J, Lorenz W, Jenkins M et al. Symptom reporting in cancer patients: the role of negative affect and experienced social stigma. Cancer 1996; 77: 983.
27. Miller G H. The magic number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol Rev 1956; 63: 81-97.
28. Dey I. Qualitative Research. A User-friendly Guide for Social Scientists. London, NewYork: Routledge, 1993.
29. Martin D K, McKneally M F. Qualitative research. In: Troidl H, McKneally M F, Mulder D S, Wechsler A S, McPeek B and Spitzer W O. eds. Surgical Research. Basic Principles and Clinical Practice. New York: Springer, 1998; 235-241.
30. Chard J A, Lilford R J, Court B V. Qualitative medical sociology: what are its crowning achievements? J R Soc Med 90: 604-609.
31. Kreitler S. Denial in cancer patients. Cancer Investig 1999; 17: 514-534.
32. Jones R. Why do qualitative research? It should begin to close the gap between the sciences of discovery and implementation. BMJ 1995; 311: 2.
33. Cabana M D, Rand C S, Powe N R, Wu A W et al. Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA 1999; 282: 1458.
34. Feinstein A. The Architecture of Clinical Research. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1985.
35. Mays N, Pope C. Rigour and qualitative research. BMJ 1995; 311: 109-112.
36. Nies C, Celik I, Lorenz W, Koller M, Plaul U, Krack W, Sitter H, Rothmund M. Outcome nach minimal-invasiver Chirurgie: Qualitative Analyse und Bewertung der klinischen Relevanz von Studienendpunkten durch Patient und Arzt. Chirurg 2001; 72: 19-29.
37. Elliott R, Fischer C T, Rennie D L. Evolving guidelines for publication of qualitative research studies in psychology and related fields. Br J Clin Psychol 1999; 38: 215-229.
38. Detmar S B, Aaronson N K. Quality of life assessment in daily clinical oncology practice: a feasibility study. Eur J Cancer 1998; 34: 1181.
39. Bezjak A, Ng P, Taylor K, MacDonald K, Depetrillo A D. A preliminary survey of oncologists' perceptions of quality of life information. Psychooncology 1997; 6: 107.
40. Wyatt J C, Wright P. Improving medical records. Part 1: can records be improved? Lancet 1998; 280 (15): 1321-1324.
41. Larkin J H, Simon H A. Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth more than thousand words. Cognit Sci 1987; 11: 65.
42. Fischhoff B. For those condemned to study the past: heuristics and biases in hindsight. In: Kahneman D, Slovic P and Tversky A. eds. Judgement Under Certainty: Heuristics and Bias. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982; 335-351
43. Ludwig F H. Perspektiven der gynäkologischen Onkologie aus der Sicht des niedergelassenen Gynäkologen. Der Gynäkol 2000; 7: 514.
44. Boulton M, Fitzpatrick R, Swinburn C. Qualitative research in health care: II. A structured review and evaluation of studies. J Eval Clin Pract 1996; 2: 171-179.
45. Grumann M, Schlag P M. Assessment of quality of life in cancer patients: complexity, criticism, challenges. Onkologie 2001; 24: 10-15.