Production operations and the use of nonfinite verbs by children with specific language impairment

Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research

Volumn 45, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 744-758

  Leonard, Laurence B ^a   Miller, Carol A ^a   Deevy, Patricia ^a   Rauf, Leila ^a   Gerber, Erika ^a   Charest, Monique ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Grammatical morphology; Language development; Language disorders; Specific language impairment; Syntax

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHILD; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT; LANGUAGE DISABILITY; MODEL; PHOTOGRAPHY; RELIABILITY; SCORING SYSTEM; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 0036693841     PISSN: 10924388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2002/060)     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Bock, J. K. (1986). Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 355-387.
2. Bock, J. K. (1989). Closed-class immanence in sentence production. Cognition, 31, 163-186.
3. Bock, J. K., Dell, G., Griffin, Z., Chang, F., & Ferreira, V. (1996). Structural priming as implicit learning. Paper presented at the Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Chicago.
4. Bock, J. K., & Levelt, W. (1994). Grammatical encoding. In M. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook ofpsycholinguistics (pp. 945-984). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
5. Bock, J. K., & Loebell, H. (1990). Framing sentences. Cognition, 35, 1-39.
6. Bock, J. K., Loebell, H., & Morey, R. (1992). From conceptual roles to structural relations: Bridging the syntactic cleft. Psychological Review, 99, 150-171.
7. Burgemeister, B., Blum, L., & Lorge, I. (1972). Columbia Mental Maturity Scale. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
8. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9. Hansson, K., Nettelbladt, U., & Leonard, L. (2000). Specific language impairment in Swedish: The status of verb morphology and word order. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43, 848-864.
10. Kail, R. (1991). Developmental change in speed of processing during childhood and adolescence. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 490-501.
11. Lapointe, S. (1985). A theory of verb form use in the speech of agrammatic aphasics. Brain and Language, 24, 100-155.
12. Lapointe, S., & Dell, G. (1989). A synthesis of some recent work in sentence production. In G. Carlson & M. Tanenhaus (Eds.), Linguistic structure in language processing (pp. 107-156). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
13. Leonard, L. (1998). Children with specific language impairment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14. Leonard, L., Eyer, J., Bedore, L., & Grela, B. (1997). Three accounts of the grammatical morpheme difficulties of English-speaking children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 40, 741-753.
15. Leonard, L., Miller, C., & Gerber, E. (1999). Grammatical morphology and the lexicon in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42, 678-689.
16. Leonard, L., Miller, C., Grela, B., Holland, A., Gerber, E., & Petucci, M. (2000). Production operations contribute to the grammatical morpheme limitations of children with specific language impairment. Journal of Memory and Language, 43, 362-378.
17. Levelt, W. J. M., & Kelter, S. (1982). Surface form and memory in question answering. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 78-106.
18. Marchman, V., Wulfeck, B., & Ellis Weismer, S. (1999). Morphological productivity in children with normal language and SLI: A study of the English past tense. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42, 206-219.
19. Miller, C., & Leonard, L. (1998). Deficits in finite verb morphology: Some assumptions in recent accounts of specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41, 701-707.
20. Oetting, J., & Horohov, J. (1997). Past tense marking by children with and without specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 40, 62-74.
21. Pickering, M., Branigan, H., Cleland, A., & Stewart, A. (2000). Activation of syntactic information during language production. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29, 205-216.
22. Radford, A. (1997). Syntactic theory and the structure of English: A minimalist approach. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
23. Reynell, J., & Gruber, C. (1990). Reynell Developmental Language Scales, U.S. Edition. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
24. Rice, M., & Wexler, K. (1996). Toward tense as a clinical marker of specific language impairment in English-speaking children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 39, 1239-1257.
25. Rice, M., Wexler, K., & Cleave, P. (1995). Specific language impairment as a period of extended optional infinitive. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38, 850-863.
26. Rice, M., Wexler, K., & Hershberger, S. (1998). Tense over time: The longitudinal course of tense acquisition in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41, 1412-1431.
27. Roid, G., & Miller, L. (1997). Leiter International Performance Scale-Revised. Wood Dale, IL: Stoelting.
28. Schütze, C., & Wexler, K. (1996). Subject case licensing and English root infinitives. In A. Stringfellow, D. Cahana-Amitay, E. Hughes, & A. Zukowski (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (Vol. 2, pp. 670-681). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
29. Smith, M., & Wheeldon, L. (2001). Syntactic priming in spoken sentence production. Cognition, 78, 123-164.
30. Werner, E., & Kresheck, J. (1983). Structured Photographic Expressive Language Test-II. DeKalb, IL: Janelle Publications.
31. Wexler, K. (1994). Optional infinitives. In D. Lightfoot & N. Hornstein (Eds.), Verb movement (pp. 305-350). New York: Cambridge University Press.
32. Wexler, K. (1998). Very early parameter setting and the unique checking constraint: A new explanation of the optional infinitive stage. Lingua, 106, 23-79.