|
Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 235-236
|
The trouble with tonometry
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
CLINICAL PRACTICE;
EDITORIAL;
GLAUCOMA;
HUMAN;
INTRAOCULAR HYPERTENSION;
INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE;
MULTIPLE REGRESSION;
OPTIC DISK ANOMALY;
PERIMETRY;
PREVALENCE;
RACE;
RISK FACTOR;
SCREENING;
TONOMETRY;
VALIDATION PROCESS;
VISUAL FIELD DEFECT;
VISUAL SYSTEM EXAMINATION;
AGING;
BLOOD PRESSURE;
BODY MASS;
DISEASE COURSE;
FEMALE;
MALE;
NOTE;
OCULOPLETHYSMOGRAPHY;
OPEN ANGLE GLAUCOMA;
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY;
PHYSIOLOGY;
SEX DIFFERENCE;
AGING;
BLOOD PRESSURE;
BODY MASS INDEX;
DISEASE PROGRESSION;
FEMALE;
GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE;
HUMAN;
INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE;
MALE;
OCULAR HYPERTENSION;
RISK FACTORS;
SEX FACTORS;
TONOMETRY;
HUMANS;
TONOMETRY, OCULAR;
|
EID: 0036667746
PISSN: 14426404
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1046/j.1442-9071.2002.00526.x Document Type: Editorial |
Times cited : (2)
|
References (18)
|