Design of low cost glaucoma screening

Documenta Ophthalmologica

Volumn 93, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 293-315

  Niessen, Antoinette G J E ^a   Langerhorst, Christine T ^a   Geijssen, H Caroline ^a   Greve, Erik L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Glaucoma; Henson CFS3000; Low costs; Photography; Retinal nerve fiber layer; Screening; Students

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANTERIOR EYE CHAMBER DEPTH; ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; EYE PHOTOGRAPHY; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; GONIOSCOPY; HEALTH CARE COST; HUMAN; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MASS SCREENING; NETHERLANDS; OPHTHALMOSCOPY; PERIMETRY; TONOMETRY; VISUAL FIELD;

DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, OPHTHALMOLOGICAL; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; NERVE FIBERS; NETHERLANDS; OPTIC NERVE; PHOTOGRAPHY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 0031395666     PISSN: 00124486     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02569068     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Wilson JMG, Junger F. Principles and practice of screening for disease. Pub Health Paper No 34. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1968.
2. Hollows FC, Graham PA. Intra-ocular pressure; glaucoma and glaucoma suspects in a defined population. Br J Ophthalmol 1966; 50: 570-86.
3. Bengtsson B. The prevalence of glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 1981; 65: 46-9.
4. Kahn HA, Milton RC. Alternative definitions of open angle glaucoma: effect on prevalence and associates in the Framingham Eye Study. Arch Ophthalmol 1980; 98: 2172-7.
5. Gibson JM, Rosenthal AR, Lavery J. A study on the prevalence of eye disease in the elderly in an English community. Trans Ophthalmol Soc UK 1985; 104: 196-203.
6. Tielsch JM, Sommer A, Katz J, Royall RM, Quigley HA, Javitt J. Racial variations in the prevalence of primary open angle glaucoma. The Baltimore Eye Survey. JAMA 1991; 266: 369-74.
7. Coffey M, Reidy A, Wormald R, Xing Xian W, Wright L, Courtney P. Prevalence of glaucoma in the west of Ireland. Br J Ophthalmol 1993; 77: 17-21.
8. Klein BEK, Klein R, Sponsel WE, Franke T, Cantor LB, Martone J, et al. Prevalence of glaucoma. The Beaver Dam Eye Study. Ophthalmol 1992; 99: 1499-1504.
9. Dielemans I, Vingerling IR, Wolfs R, Hofman A, Grobbee DE, Jong de PTVM. The prevalence of glaucoma in a population-based study in the Netherlands: The Rotterdam Study. Ophthalmology 1994; 101: 1851-5.
10. Bengtsson B. Incidence of manifest glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 1989; 73: 483-7.
11. Leske MC, Ederer F, Podgor M. Estimating incidence from age-specific prevalence in glaucoma. Am J Epidemiol 1981; 113: 606-13.
12. Podgor MJ, Leske MC, Ederer F. Incidence estimates for lens changes, macular changes, open-angle glaucoma and diabetic retinopathy. Am J Epidemiol 1983; 118: 206-12.
13. Brav SS, Kirber HP. Mass screening for glaucoma. JAMA 1951; 17: 1127-8.
14. Tielsch JM, Katz J, Singh K, Quigley HA, Gottsch JD, Javitt J, et al. A population-based evaluation of glaucoma screening: The Baltimore Eye Survey. Am J Epidemiol 1991; 134: 1102-10.
15. Tielsch JM. Screening for primary open-angle glaucoma: Alternative strategies and future directions. J Glaucoma 1992; 1: 214-8
16. Hoyt WF, Frisen L, Newman NM. Fundoscopy of nerve fiber layer defects in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol 1973; 12: 814-29.
17. Quigley HA. Examination of the retinal nerve fiber layer in the recognition of early glaucoma damage. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1986; 84: 920-66.
18. Sommer A, Miller NR, Pollack I, Maumenee AE, George T. The nerve fiber layer in the diagnosis of glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 1977; 95: 2149-56.
19. Henson DB, Bryson H. Clinical results with the Henson-Hamblin CFS2000. In: Greve EL, Heijl A, eds. Seventh International Visual Field Symposium. The Netherlands: W Junk, 1987: 233-8.
20. Langerhorst CT, Bakker D, Raakman MAC. Usefulness of the Henson Central Field Screener for the detection of visual field defects, especially in glaucoma. Doc Ophthalmol 1989; 72: 279-85.
21. Tuulonen A, Airaksinen PJ, Montagna A, Nieminen H. Screening for glaucoma with a non-mydriatic fundus camera. Acta Ophthalmol 1990; 68: 445-9.
22. Fisher JH, Watson PG, Spaeth G. A new handheld air impulse tonometer. Eye 1988; 2: 238-42.
23. Van Herick W, Shaffer RN, Schwartz A. Estimation of width of angle of anterior chamber. Am J Ophthalmol 1969; 68: 626-9.
24. Shaffer RN. Stereoscopic manual of gonioscopy. St. Louis: CV Mosby Co, 1962.
25. Hodapp E, Parrish RK, Anderson DR. Clinical decisions in glaucoma. St. Louis: CV Mosby, 1993: 52-61.
26. Tielsch JM, Katz J, Quigley HA, Miller NR, Sommer A. Intraobserver and interobserver agreement in measurement of optic disk characteristics. Ophthalmology 1988; 95: 350-6.
27. Niessen AGJE, van den Berg TJTP, Langerhorst CT, Bossuyt PMM. Grading of retinal nerve fiber layer with a photographic reference set. Am J Ophthalmol 1995; 120: 577-86.
28. Niessen AGJE, van den Berg TJTP. Evaluation of grading system for retinal nerve fiber layer photographs in 1941 eyes. Submitted.
29. Sponsel WE, Ritch R, Stamper R, Higginbotham ET, Anderson DR, Wilson MR, et al. Prevent blindness America visual field screening study. Am J Ophthalmol 1995; 120: 699-708.
30. Wang F, Quigley HA, Tielsch JM. Screening for glaucoma in a medical clinic with photographs of the nerve fiber layer. Arch Ophthalmol 1994; 112: 796-800.
31. Atkinson PL, Wishart PK, James JN, Vernon SA, Reid F. Deterioration in the accuracy of the pulsair non-contact tonometer with use: need for regular calibration. Eye 1992; 6: 530-4.
32. Vernon SA. Reproducibility with the Keeler Pulsair 2000 non-contact tonometer. Br J Ophthalmol 1995: 79: 554-7.
33. Tuck MW, Crick RP. Non-contact tonometry: optometrists' current practice in England and Wales. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1994; 14: 347-51.
34. Vernon SA, Henry DJ, Cater L, Jones SJ. Screening for glaucoma in the community by non-ophthalmologically trained staff using semi-automated equipment. Eye 1990; 4: 89-97.
35. Shiose Y, Kitazawa Y, Tsukahara S, Akamatsu T, Mimkami K, Futa R, et al. Epidemiology of glaucoma in Japan, a nationwide glaucoma survey. Jpn J Ophthalmol 1991; 35: 133-55.
36. Wilensky JT, Kaufman PL, Frohlichstein D, Gieser DK, Kass MA, Ritch R, et al. Follow-up of angle-closure glaucoma suspects. Am J Ophthalmol 1993; 115: 338-46.
37. Tuck MW, Crick RP. Screening for glaucoma: the time taken by primary examiners to conduct visual field tests in practice. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1994; 14: 351-5.
38. Jones SJ, Vernon SA, Cater L, Henry DJ. Costing a community based screening programme for the detection of glaucoma. Eye 1990: 4: 98-102.
39. Sheldrick JH, Sharp AJH. Glaucoma screening clinic in general practice: prevalence of occult disease, and resource implications. Br J Gen Pract 1994; 44: 561-5.
40. Sommer A, Tielsch JM, Katz J, Quigley HA, Gottsch JD, Javitt J, et al. Relationship between intraocular pressure and primary open angle glaucoma among white and black americans. Arch Ophthalmol 1991; 109: 1090-5.
41. Leske MC. The epidemiology of open-angle glaucoma: a review. Am J Epidemiol 1983; 118: 166-91.
42. Armaly MF. On the distribution of applanation pressure. 1. Statistical features and the effect of age, sex, and family history of glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 1965; 73: 11-18.
43. Armaly MF, Krueger DE, Maunder L, Becker B, Hetherington J, Kolker AE, et al. Biostatistical analysis of the collaborative glaucoma study. 1. Summary report of the risk factors for glaucomatous visual-field defects. Arch Ophthalmol 1980; 98: 2163-71.
44. David R, Livingston DG, Luntz MH. Ocular hypertension, along-term follow-up of treated and untreated patients. Br J Ophthalmol 1977; 61: 668-74.
45. Sommer A. Intraocular pressure and glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 1989; 107: 186-8.
46. Eddy DM, Sanders LE, Eddy JF. The value of screening for glaucoma with tonometry. Surv Ophthalmol 1983; 28: 194-205.
47. De Koning HJ, van Ineveld BM, van Oortmarssen GJ, Boer R, Collette HJA Verbeek ALM, et al. The costs and effects of mass screening for breast cancer. Final report. Dept. of Public Health and Social Medicine, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, 1990.