Driving performance in patients with mild to moderate glaucomatous clinical vision changes

Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development

Volumn 39, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 467-481

  Szlyk, Janet P ^a,c   Taglia, Daniel P ^b   Paliga, Jennifer ^a   Edward, Deepak P ^a,b   Wilensky, Jacob T ^a  

^a VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS   (United States)

^c JESSE BROWN VA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Contrast sensitivity; Driving performance; Glaucoma

Indexed keywords

BRAKING; OPHTHALMOLOGY; VISION;

DRIVING PERFORMANCE;

PATIENT REHABILITATION;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; DRIVING ABILITY; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMULATOR; TRAFFIC ACCIDENT; VISION; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL IMPAIRMENT;

AUTOMOBILE DRIVING; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

EID: 0036657226     PISSN: 07487711     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Arden GB, Jacobsen JJ. A simple grating testing for contrast sensitivity: preliminary results indicate value in screening for glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1978;17:23-32.
2. Hitchings RA, Powell DJ, Arden GB, Carter RM. Contrast sensitivity gratings in glaucoma family screening. Br J Ophthalmol 1981;65:518-24.
3. Motolko MA, Phelps CD. Contrast sensitivity in asymmetric glaucoma. Int Ophthalmol 1984;7:45-49.
4. Zulauf M, Flammer J. Correction of spatial contrast sensitivity and visual fields in glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1993;231:146-50.
5. Gutierrez P, Wilson MR, Johnson C, Gordon M, Cioffi GA, Ritch R, Sherwood M, Meng K, Mangione CM. Influence of glaucomatous field loss on health-related quality of life. Arch Ophthalmol 1997;115:777-84.
6. Parrish RK, Gedde SJ, Scott IU, Feuer WJ, Schiffman JC, Mangione CM, Montenegro-Piniella A. Visual function and quality of life among patients with glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 1997;115:1447-55.
7. Decina LE, Staplin L. Retrospective evaluation of alternative vision screening criteria for older and younger drivers. Accid Anal Prev 1993;25(3):267-75.
8. Owsley C, McGwin G. Vision impairment and driving. Surv Ophthalmol 1999;43(6):535-50.
9. Szlyk JP, Pizzimenti CE, Fishman GA, Kelsch R, Wetzel LC, Kagan S, Ho K. A comparison of driving in older subjects with and without age-related macular degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol 1995;113:1033-40.
10. Szlyk JP, Fishman GA, Master SP, Alexander KR. Assessment of driving performance in patients with retinitis pigmentosa. Arch Ophthalmol 1992;10:1709-13.
11. Szlyk JP, Fishman GA, Severing K, Alexander KR, Viana M. Evaluation of driving performance in patients with juvenile macular dystrophies. Arch Ophthalmol 1993;111:207-12.
12. Bailey IL, Bullimore MA, Raasch TW, Taylor HR. Clinical grading and the effects of scaling. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1991;32:422-32.
13. Pelli DG, Robson JG, Wilkins AJ. The design of a new letter chart for measuring contrast sensitivity. Clin Vis Sci 1988;2:187-99.
14. Elliott DB, Bullimore MA, Bailey IL. Improving the reliability of the Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity chart. Clin Vis Sci 1991;6:471-75.
15. Szlyk JP, Seiple W, Fishman GA, Alexander KR, Grover S, Mahler CL. Perceived and actual performance of daily tasks: Relationship to visual function tests in individuals with retinitis pigmentosa. Ophthalmology 2001;108(1):65-75.
16. Fishman GA, Anderson RJ, Stinson L, Haque A. Driving performance of retinitis pigmentosa patients. Br J Ophthalmol 1981;65:122-26.
17. Johnson CA, Keltner JL. Incidence of visual field loss in 20,000 eyes and its relationship to driving performance. Arch Ophthalmol 1983;101:371-75.
18. Wood JM, Troutbeck R. Effect of restriction of the binocular visual field on driving performance. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1992;3:291-98.
19. Wood JM, Troutbeck R. Effect of visual impairment on driving. Hum Factors 1994;3:476-87.
20. McKnight AJ, Shinar D, Hilburn B. The visual and driving performance of monocular and binocular heavy-duty truck drivers. Accid Anal Prev 1991;4:225-37.
21. Seiple W. The clinical utility of spatial contrast sensitivity testing [chapter 114]. In: Tasman W, Jaeger E, editors. Duane's Foundations of Clinical Ophthalmology. Philadelphia (PA): Lippincott; 1992. p. 1-13.