Developing an OSCE station to assess the ability of medical students to share information and decisions with patients: Issues relating to interrater reliability and the use of simulated patients

Education for Health

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 170-179

  Thistlethwaite, Jill E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Assessment; Communication skills; Patient partnership; Reliability; Shared decision making; Simulated patients

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; CLINICAL OBSERVATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL STUDENT; PATIENT; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; RELIABILITY; SIMULATION; SKILL; TREATMENT PLANNING;

EID: 0036655997     PISSN: 13576283     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13576280210133099     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Simulated surgery in the summative assessment of general practice training: Results of a trial in the Trent and Yorkshire regions
2. Assessing the ability of medical students to apply evidence in practice: The potential of the OSCE
3. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: What does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango)
4. AMEE medical education guide no. 13: Real patients, simulated patients and simulators in clinical examinations
5. Paternalism or partnership?
6. Measuring the involvement of patients in shared decision-making: A systematic review of instruments
7. The consultation and health outcome
8. Symptomatic benefit from eradicating Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with nonulcer dyspepsia
9. Use of an objective structured clinical examination in evaluating student performance
10. Evaluating medical students' literature-appraisal skills
11. Absence of benefit of eradicating Helicobacter pylori in patients with nonulcer dyspepsia
12. Framework for teaching and learning informed shared decision making
13. Assessment of clinical skills with standardized patients: State of the art
14. Standardized/simulated patients' accuracy in recording clinical performance checklist items