Marginal microleakage around enamel and cementum surfaces of two compomers

Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 307-310

  Cortes, Olga ^a,b   Garcia, Carlos ^a   Perez, Leonor ^a   Perez, Domingo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MURCIA   (Spain)

^b NONE   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPOGLASS; COMPOMER; DYRACT; GLASS IONOMER; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; RESIN; SILICATE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CEMENTUM; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; ENAMEL; ENDODONTICS; EVALUATION; HUMAN; TOOTH DISEASE;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COMPOMERS; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CEMENTUM; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL LEAKAGE; EVALUATION STUDIES; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); METHACRYLATES; SILICATES;

EID: 0032084474     PISSN: 10534628     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Wilson AD, Prosser HJ. Aluminosilicate dental cements. CRC Press Series in Biocompatibility. 3: 41-77, 1982.
2. Wilson AD, Kent BE. The glass ionomer cement, a new translucent cement for dentistry. J Appl Chem Biotechnol. 21: 313-317, 1971.
3. McLean JW. Cemento de ionomero de vidrio. Quintessence (ed. esp). 4: 273-279, 1991.
4. Coury TL, Miranda FJ, Willer RD, et al. Adhesiveness of glass ionomer cement to enamel and dentin: a laboratory study. Oper Dent 7: 2-6, 1982.
5. Crisp S, Lewis B, Wilson AD. Glass ionomer cement-chemistry of erosion. J Dent Res 55: 1032-1041, 1976.
6. Meryon SD, Smith AJ. A comparison of fluoride release from three glass ionomer cements and a polycarboxylate cement. Int Endodont J 17: 16-24, 1984.
7. Gaintantzopoulou MD, Willis GP, Kafrawy AH. Pulp reactions to light-cured glass ionomer cements. Am J Dent 7: 39-42, 1994.
8. Mount GJ, Makinson OF. Glass ionomer restorative cements: clinical implications of the setting reaction. Oper Dent 7: 134-141, 1982.
9. Phillips S, Bishop BM. An in vitro study of the effect of moisture on glass-ionomer cement. Quint Int 2: 175-177, 1985.
10. Yedid SE, Chanb KC. Bond strength of three esthetic restorative materials to enamel and dentin. J Prosthet Dent 44: 573-578, 1980.
11. Asmussen E. Opacity of glass ionomer cements. Acta Odontol Scand 41: 155-159, 1983.
12. De la Macorra JC. Nuevos materiales a base de vidrio ionomeros hibridos y resinas compuestas modificadas. Rev Eur Odontoest 7: 259-272, 1995.
13. Dickens-Venz SH, Takagi S, Chow LC. et al. Physical and chemical properties of resin reinforced calcium phosphate cements. Dent Mater 10: 100-106, 1994.
14. Peters MC, Roeters FJ. Clinical performance of a new compomer restorative in pediatric dentistry. J Den Res 73: (Abstr) 34, 1994.
15. Salama FS, Riad MI, Abdel Megid FY. Microleakage and marginal gap formation of glass ionomer resin restorations. J Clin Pediatr Dent 20: 31-36, 1995.
16. Powis DR, Folleras T, Merson SA. et al. Improved adhesion of glass-ionomer to dentin and enamel. J Dent Res 61: 1416-1422, 1982.
17. Ferrer C, Robles V, Lucena C, Navajas JM. Microfiltracihn en cavidades de clase V obturadas con ionomeros fotopolimerizables. Rev Eur Odontoest 7: 207-12, 1995.
18. Doerr L, Hilton TJ, Hermesen CB. Effect of thermocycling on the microleakage of conventional and resin-modified glass ionomers. Am J Dent 9: 19-21, 1996
19. Sepet E, Aytepe Z, Guven Y. Artificially formed caries-like lesions around Class II glass ionomer restorations in primary molars. J Clin Pediatr Dent 20: 37-40, 1995.
20. Walls AW, Murray JJ McCabe JF. The use of glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cements in the deciduous dentition. Br Dent J 165: 13-17, 1988.
21. Andersson IE, van Dyken JW, Stenberg R. Effect of cavity form on the durability of glass ionomer cement restorations in primary teeth: A three year clinical evaluation. J Dent Child 62: 197-200, 1995.
22. Shidu, S.K.: Sealing efectiveness of light-cured glass ionomer cement liners. Prosthet Dent J 68: 891-94, 1992.
23. Fuchs AB, Grajower R, Shapira J. In vitro assessment of marginal leakage of sealants placed in permanent molars with different etching times. J Dent Child 51: 425-27, 1984.
24. Jensen E, Handelman SL. In vitro assessment of marginal leakage of six enamel sealants. J Prosthet Dent 39: 304-6, 1978.
25. Park K, Georgescu M, Scherer W, Schulman A. Comparison of shear strength, fracture patterns, and microleakage among unfilled, filled, and fluoride-releasing sealants. Pediatr Dent 15: 418-21, 1993.
26. Spierings TA, Peters MC, Plasschaurt AJ. Thermal trauma to teeth. Endod Dent Traumatol 1: 123-129, 1985.
27. Feilzer AL, de Goe AJ, Davidson CL. Curing contraction of composite and glass ionomer cement. J Prosthet Dent 59: 298-300, 1988.
28. Litkowski LJ, McDonald NJ, Swierczewski MA. A comparison of thermocycling methods for evaluating microleakage. J Dent Res 68: Abstract 208, 1989.
29. Loiselle RJ, Goldberg AP, Gross RL, Stuever CH. Marginal microleakage-an in vivo assessment. J Am Dent Assoc 78: 758-60, 1969.
30. Barnes DM, Thompson VP, Blank LW, McDonald NJ. Microleakage of class V composite resin restorations: a comparison between in vivo and in vitro. Oper Dent 18: 237-45, 1993.