Current and future perspectives on the role of internal coils for magnetic resonance imaging of the anal sphincter and rectum

Abdominal Imaging

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 432-441

  De Souza, N M ^a  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GLUCAGON; SCOPOLAMINE BUTYL BROMIDE;

ABDOMINAL SURGERY; ANESTHESIA; ANORECTAL DISEASE; ANORECTAL MALFORMATION; ANUS FISTULA; ANUS SPHINCTER DISORDER; ARTICLE; CHILDBIRTH; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DEVICE; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FECES INCONTINENCE; HUMAN; LYMPH NODE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PERINEUM; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECTUM CARCINOMA; SCLERODERMA; SEPSIS; SEX DIFFERENCE; TISSUE REPAIR; ANAL CANAL; CHILD; CONGENITAL MALFORMATION; FEMALE; FORECASTING; INSTRUMENTATION; LOCALIZED SCLERODERMA; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; MALE; PATHOLOGY; RECTUM; RECTUM TUMOR; STANDARD;

ANAL CANAL; CHILD; FECAL INCONTINENCE; FEMALE; FORECASTING; HUMANS; LYMPHATIC METASTASIS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; RECTAL NEOPLASMS; RECTUM; SCLERODERMA, LOCALIZED; SEX FACTORS;

EID: 0036629521     PISSN: 09428925     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00261-001-0124-6     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, et al. Anal sphincter disruption during vaginal delivery. N Engl J Med 1993;329:1905-1911
2. Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, et al. Endosonography of the anal sphincters: normal anatomy and comparison with manometry. Clin Radiol 1994;49:368-374
3. Schäfer A, Enck P, Furst G, et al. Anatomy of the anal sphincter; comparison of anal endosongraphy to magnetic resonance imaging. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:777-781
4. de Souza NM, Kmiot WA, Puni R, et al. High resolution magnetic resonance imaging of the anal sphincter using an internal coil. Gut 1995;37:284-287
5. de Souza NM, Puni R, Kmiot WA, et al. MRI of the anal sphincter. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1995;19:745-751
6. de Souza NM, Puni R, Gilderdale DJ, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the anal sphincter using an internal coil. Magn Res Q 1995;11:45-56.
7. Hussain SM, Stoker J, Kuiper JW, et al. MR imaging of the anal sphincter complex with an endoanal coil: normal anatomy. Radiology 1995;197:671-677
8. Vogl TJ, Pegios W, Mack MG, et al. Accuracy of staging rectal tumors with contrast-enhanced transrectal MR imaging. AJR 1997; 168:1427-1434
9. Oh C, Kark AE. Anatomy of the external anal sphincter. Br J Surg 1972;50:717-723
10. Parks AG, Gordon PH, Hardcastle JD. A classification of fistulain-ano. Br J Surg 1976;63:1-12
11. Marks CG, Ritchie JK. Anal fistulas at St Mark's Hospital. Br J Surg 1977;64:84-91
12. Seow-Choen F, Phillips RK. Insights gained from the management of problematical anal fistulae at St Mark's Hospital 1984-1988. Br J Surg 1991;78:539-541
13. Thompson HR. The orthodox conception of fistula-in-ano and its treatment. Proc R Soc Med 1962;55:754-756
14. Sangwan YP, Rosen L, Riether RD, et al. Is simple fistula-in-ano simple? Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:885-889
15. Kuypers HC. Use of the seton in the treatment of extrasphincteric anal fistula. Dis Colon Rectum 1984;27:109-110
16. Williams JG, MacLeod CA, Rothenberger DA, et al. Seton treatment of high anal fistulae. Br J Surg 1991;78:1159-1161
17. Kodner IJ, Mazor A, Shemesh EI, et al. Endorectal advancement flap repair of rectovaginal and other complicated anorectal fistulas. Surgery 1993;114:682-690
18. Zbar AP, de Souza NM, Puni R, et al. Comparison of endoanal magnetic resonance imaging with surgical findings in perirectal sepsis. Br J Surg 1998;85:111-114
19. Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, et al. Anal sphincter trauma during instrumental delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1993;43:263-270
20. Burnett SJD, Spence-Jones C, Speakman CTM, et al. Unsuspected sphincter damage following childbirth revealed by endoanal ultrasonography. Br J Radiol 1991;64:225-227
21. Law PJ, Kamm MA, Bartam CI. Anal endosonography in the investigation of faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 1991;78:312-314
22. Engel AF, Kamm MA, Bartram CI, et al. Relationship of symptoms in faecal incontinence to specific sphincter abnormalities. Int J Colorect Dis 1995;10:152-155
23. Felt-Bersma RJF, Cuesta MA, Koorevaar M, et al. Anal endosonography: relationship with anal manometry and neurophysiologic tests. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:944-949
24. Setti-Carraro P, Kamm MA, Nicholls RJ. Long term followup of postanal repair for faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 1994;81:140-144
25. Wexner SD, Marchetti F, Jagelman DG. The role of sphincteroplasty for fecal incontinence reevaluated: a prospective physiologic and functional review. Dis Colon Rectum 1990;34:22-30
26. Engel AF, Kamm MA, Sultan AH, et al. Anterior anal sphincter repair for patients with obstetric trauma. Br J Surg 1994;81:1231-1234
27. Simmang C, Birnbaum EH, Kodner IJ, et al. Anal sphincter reconstruction in the elderly: does advancing age affect outcome? Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:1065-1069
28. de Souza NM, Puni R, Zbar A, et al. MR imaging of the anal sphincter in multiparous females using an endoanal coil: correlation with in vitro anatomy and appearances in fecal incontinence. AJR 1996;167:1465-1471
29. Kumar D, Williams NS, Waldron D, et al. Prolonged manometric recording of anorectal motor activity in ambulant human subjects: evidence of periodic activity. Gut 1989;30:1007-1011
30. Bannister JJ, Read NW, Donnelly TC, et al. External and internal anal sphincter response to rectal distension in normal subjects and in patients with idiopathic fecal incontinence. Br J Surg 1989;76: 617-621
31. de Souza NM, Williams AD, Wilson HJ, et al. Fecal incontinence in systemic sclerosis: assessment of the anal sphincter using high resolution endoanal MR iamging. Radiology 1998 208:529-535.
32. Joosten FB, Jansen JBMJ, Joosten HJM, et al. Staging of rectal carcinoma using MR double surface coil, MR endorectal coil and intrarectal ultrasound: correlation with histopathologic findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1995;19:752-758
33. Zerhouni EA, Rutter C, Hamilton SR, et al. CT and MR imaging in the staging of colorectal carcinoma: report of the Radiology Diagnostic Oncology Group II. Radiology 1996;200:443-451
34. Lindmark GE, Kraaz WG, Elvin PA, et al. Rectal cancer: evaluation of staging with endosonography. Radiology 1997;204:533-538
35. Frykholm G, Hemmingsson A, Nyman R, et al. Nonresectable adenocarcinoma of the rectum assessed by MR imaging before and after chemotherapy and irradiation. Acta Radiol 1992;33:447-452
36. de Lange EE, Fechner RE, Spaulding CA, et al. Rectal carcinoma treated by preoperative irradiation: MR imaging and histopathologic correlation. AJR 1992;158:287-292
37. Schnall MD, Furth EE, Rosato EF, et al. Rectal tumor stage: correlation of endorectal MR imaging and pathologic findings [see comments]. Radiology 1994;190:709-714
38. Blomqvist L, Holm T, Rubio C, et al. Rectal tumours - MR imaging with endorectal and/or phased-array coils, and histopathological staging on giant sections. Acta Radiol 1997;38:437-444
39. Zbar AP, de Souza NM, Strickland N, et al. Comparison of endoanal magnetic resonance imaging and computerized tomography in the preoperative staging of rectal cancer: a pilot study. Tech Coloproctol 1998;2:61-66
40. McCarthy PA, Rubesin SE, Levine MS, et al. Colon cancer: morphology detected with barium enema examination versus histopathologic stage. Radiology 1995;197:683-687
41. Zagoria RJ, Schlarb CA, Ott DJ, et al. Assessment of rectal tumor infiltration utilizing endorectal MR imaging and comparison with endoscopic rectal sonography. J Surg Oncol 1997;64:312-317
42. Meyenberger C, Huch Boni RA, Bertschinger P, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound and endorectal magnetic resonance imaging: a prospective, comparative study for preoperative staging and follow-up of rectal cancer. Endoscopy 1995;27:469-479
43. de Souza NM, Hall AS, Puni R, et al. High resolution magnetic resoance of the anal sphincter using a dedicated endoanal coil: comparison of MR imaging with surgical findings. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39:926-934
44. Huddy SP, Husband EM, Cook MG, et al. Lymph node metastases in early rectal cancer. Br J Surg 1993;80:1457-1458
45. Detry RJ, Kartheuser AH, Lagneaux G, et al. Preoperative lymph node staging in rectal cancer: a difficult challenge. Int J Colorect Dis 1996;11:217-221
46. Santulli TV, Kiesewetter WB, Bill AH Jr. Anorectal anomalies: a suggested international classification. J Pediatr Surg 1970;5:281-287
47. de Souza NM, Gilderdale DJ, MacIver DK, et al. High resolution magnetic resoance imaging of the anal sphincter in children: a pilot study using endoanal receiver coils. AJR 1997;169:201-206
48. de Souza NM, Ward HC, Williams AD, et al. Transanal MR imaging after repair of anorectal anomalies in children: appearances in pull-through vs. posterior sagittal reconstructions. AJR 1999;173: 723-728
49. Mulder W, de-Jong E, Wanters I, et al. Posterior sagittal anorectoplasty: functional results of primary and secondary operations in comparison to the pull-through method in anorectal malformations. Eur J Pediatr Surg 1995;5:170-173
50. Pena A, Behery M. Megasigmoid: a source of pseudoincontinence in children with repaired anorectal malformations. J Pediatr Surg 1993;28:199-203
51. Lia L, Li X, Wang LY, et al. Anorectal anomaly: neuropathological changes in the sacral spinal cord. J Pediatr Surg 1993;28:880-885