CT and MR imaging in the staging of colorectal carcinoma: Report of the Radiology Diagnostic Oncology Group II

Radiology

Volumn 200, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 443-451

  Zerhouni, Elias A ^a   Rutter, Carolyn ^b   Hamilton, Stanley R ^a   Balfe, Dennis M ^c   Megibow, Alec J ^d   Francis, Isaac R ^e   Moss, Albert A ^e   Heiken, Jay P ^c   Tempany, Clare M C ^a,g   Aisen, Alex M ^f,h   Weinreb, Jeffrey C ^d   Gatsonis, Constantine ^b,i   McNeil, Barbara J ^b  

^a DEPARTMENT OF PATHOLOGY   (United States)

^b HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d NEW YORK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN HOSPITALS   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^g BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^h INDIANA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

ⁱ BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Colon, CT; Colon, MR; Colon, neoplasms; Liver neoplasms, secondary; Lymphatic system, neoplasms; Rectum, CT; Rectum, MR; Rectum, neoplasms

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER INVASION; CANCER STAGING; COLON CANCER; COLORECTAL CARCINOMA; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LIVER METASTASIS; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; LYMPHATIC SYSTEM; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECTUM CANCER; TUMOR VOLUME;

EID: 8944253297     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.200.2.8685340     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. DeVita VT Jr, Rosenberg SA, Hellman S. Cancer: principles and practice of oncology. 4th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott, 1993.
2. Stark DD, Wittenberg J, Butch RJ, Ferrucci JJ. Hepatic metastases: randomized, controlled comparison of detection with MR imaging and CT. Radiology 1987; 165:399-406.
3. Acunas B, Rozanes I, Acunas G, Celik L, Sayi I, Gokmen E. Preoperative CT staging of colon carcinoma (excluding the recto-sigmoid region). Eur J Radiol 1990; 11:150-153.
4. Barakos JA, Goldberg HI, Brown JJ, Gilbert TJ. Comparison of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of focal hepatic lesions. Gastrointest Radiol 1990; 15:93-101.
5. Wernecke K, Rummeny E, Bongartz G, et al. Detection of hepatic masses in patients with carcinoma: comparative sensitivities of sonography, CT, and MR imaging [see comments]. AJR 1991; 157:731-739.
6. Bronskill MJ, Henkelman RM, Poon PY, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and radionuclide scintigraphy in detection of liver metastases. Can Assoc Radiol J 1988; 39:3-9.
7. Rummeny EJ, Wernecke K, Saini S, et al. Comparison between high-field-strength MR imaging and CT for screening of hepatic metastases: a receiver operating characteristic analysis. Radiology 1992; 182:879-886.
8. Vassiliades VG, Foley WD, Alarcon J, et al. Hepatic metastases: CT versus MR imaging at 1.5 T. Gastrointest Radiol 1991; 16:159-163.
9. Zeman RK, Dritschilo A, Silverman PM, et al. Dynamic CT vs 0.5 T MR imaging in the detection of surgically proven hepatic metastases. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1989; 13:637-644.
10. Gothlin J, Gutierrez D, Dondelinger R, Kurdziel JC, Schwartz S. Computed tomographic arteriography (CTA) of the liver: evaluation of technique, results and indications. Eur J Radiol 1986; 6:191-194.
11. Lindberg CG, Lundstedt C, Stridbeck H, Tranberg KG. Accuracy of CT arterial portography of the liver compared with findings at laparotomy. Acta Radiol 1993; 34:139-142.
12. Lundstedt C, Ekberg H, Hederstrom E, Stridbeck H, Torfason B, Tranberg KG. Radiologic diagnosis of liver metastases in colo-rectal carcinoma: prospective evaluation of the accuracy of angiography, ultrasonography, computed tomography and computed tomographic angiography. Acta Radiol 1987; 28:431-438.
13. Matsui O, Takashima T, Kadoya M, et al. Liver metastases from colorectal cancers: detection with CT during arterial portography. Radiology 1987; 165:65-69.
14. Soyer P, Levesque M, Caudron C, Elias D, Zeitoun G, Roche A. MRI of liver metastases from colorectal cancer vs CT during arterial portography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1993; 17:67-74.
15. Heiken JP, Lee JK, Glazer HS, Ling D. Hepatic metastases studied with MR and CT. Radiology 1985; 156:423-427.
16. Gray R, Begg CB, Greenes RA. Construction of receiver operating characteristics when disease verification is subject to selection. Med Decis Making 1984; 4:151-164.
17. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982; 143:29-36.
18. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. New York, NY: Wiley, 1989.
19. Lipsitz SR, Harrington DP. Analyzing correlated binary data using SAS. Comput Biomed Res 1990; 23:268-282.
20. Rosner B. Fundamentals of biostatistics. Boston, Mass: Duxbury, 1982.
21. Finlay IG, McArdle CS. Occult hepatic metastases in colorectal carcinoma. Br J Surg 1986; 73:732-735.
22. Balthazar EJ, Megibow AJ, Hulnick D, Naidich DP. Carcinoma of the colon: detection and preoperative staging by CT. AJR 1988; 150:301-306.
23. Freeny PC, Marks WM, Ryan JA, Bolen JW. Colorectal carcinoma evaluation with CT: preoperative staging and detection of postoperative recurrence. Radiology 1986; 158:347-353.
24. Rifkin MD, Zerhouni EA, Gatsonis CA, et al. Comparison of MRI and US in staging early prostate cancer: results of a multiinstitutional cooperative trial. N Engl J Med 1990; 323:621-626.
25. Webb WR, Gatsonis C, Zerhouni EA, et al. CT and MR imaging in staging non-small cell bronchogenic carcinoma: report of the Radiologic Diagnostic Oncology Group. Radiology 1991; 178:705-713.
26. Brasch RC. New directions in the development of MR imaging contrast media (review). Radiology 1992; 183:1-11.
27. Hagspiel KD, Neidl KFW, Eichenberger AC, Weder W, Marincek B. Detection of liver metastases: comparison of superparamagnetic iron oxide - enhanced and unenhanced MR imaging at 1.5 T with dynamic CT, intraoperative US, and percutaneous US. Radiology 1995; 196:471-478.
28. Semelka RC, Shoenut JP, Ascher SM, et al. Solitary hepatic metastasis: comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced CT and MR imaging with fat-suppressed T2-weighted, breath-hold T1-weighted FLASH, and dynamic gadolinium-enhanced FLASH sequences. JMRI 1994; 4:319-323.