Computer-aided diagnosis of breast cancer in mammography: Evidence and potential

Technology in Cancer Research and Treatment

Volumn 1, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 211-216

  Jiang, Yulei ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BENIGN TUMOR; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LABORATORY; MALIGNANT NEOPLASTIC DISEASE; MAMMOGRAPHY; OBSERVER VARIATION; PERFORMANCE; RADIOLOGIST; REVIEW; ARTICLE; BREAST TUMOR; METHODOLOGY;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY;

EID: 0036628066     PISSN: 15330346     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/153303460200100306     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. Jemal, A., Thomas, A., Murray, T., Thun, M., Cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 52, 23-47 (2002).
2. Elmore, J. G., Barton, M. B., Moceri, V. M., Polk, S., Arena, P. J., Fletcher, S. W., Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations. N Engl J Med 338, 1089-1096 (1998).
3. Tabár, L., Dean, P. B., Teaching Atlas of Mammography. Thieme-Stratton, New York, (1985).
4. American College of Radiology. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS™). Third ed. American College of Radiology, Reston, VA, (1998).
5. Jiang, Y., Nishikawa, R. M., Wolverton, D. E., Metz, C. E., Giger, M. L., Schmidt, R. A., Vyborny, C. J., Doi, K., Malignant and benign clustered microcalcifications: automated feature analysis and classification. Radiology 198, 671-678 (1996).
6. Getty, D. J., Pickett, R. M., D'Orsi, C. J., Swets, J. A., Enhanced interpretation of diagnostic images. Invest Radial 23, 240-252 (1988).
7. Chan, H. P., Sahiner, B., Helvie, M. A., Petrick, N., Roubidoux, M. A., Wilson, T. E., Adler, D. D., Paramagul, C., Newman, J. S., Sanjay-Gopal, S., Improvement of radiologists' characterization of mammographic masses by using computer-aided diagnosis: an ROC study. Radiology 212, 817-827 (1999).
8. Jiang, Y., Nishikawa, R. M., Schmidt, R. A., Metz, C. E., Giger, M. L., Doi, K., Improving breast cancer diagnosis with computer-aided diagnosis. Acad Radial 6, 22-33 (1999).
9. Swets, J. A., Pickett, R. M., Evaluation of Diagnostic Systems: Methods from Signal Detection Theory. Academic Press, New York. (1982).
10. Metz, C. E., Some practical issues of experimental design and data analysis in radiological ROC studies. Invest Radiol 24, 234-245 (1989).
11. Metz, C. E., ROC methodology in radiologic imaging. Invest Radiol 21, 720-733 (1986).
12. Swets, J. A., Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 240, 1285-1293 (1988).
13. Hanley, J. A., Mcneil, B. J., The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 143, 29-36 (1982).
14. Jiang, Y., Metz, C. E., Nishikawa, R. M., A receiver operating characteristic partial area index for highly sensitive diagnostic tests. Radiology 201, 745-750 (1996).
15. Dorfman, D. D., Berbaum, K. S., Metz, C. E., Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis. Generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method. Invest Radiol 27, 723-731 (1992).
16. Elmore, J. G., Wells, C. K., Lee, C. H., Howard, D. H., Feinstein, A. R., Variability in radiologists' interpretations of mammograms. N Engl J Med 331, 1493-1499 (1994).
17. Beam, C. A., Layde, P. M., Sullivan, D. C., Variability in the interpretation of screening mammograms by US radiologists. Findings from a national sample. Arch Intern Med 156, 209-213 (1996).
18. Schmidt, R. A., Newstead, G. M., Linver, M. N., Eklund, G. W., Metz, C. E., Winkler, M. N., Nishikawa, R. M., Mammographic screening sensitivity of general radiologists. In: Digital Mammography. pp. 383-388. Eds., Karssemeijer, N., Thijssen, M., Hendriks, J., Van Erning, L., Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1998).
19. Jiang, Y., Nishikawa, R. M., Schmidt, R. A., Toledano, A. Y., Doi, K., Potential of computer-aided diagnosis to reduce variability in radiologists' interpretations of mammograms depicting microcalcifications. Radiology 220, 787-794 (2001).
20. Beiden, S. V., Wagner, R. F., Campbell, G., Metz, C. E., Jiang, Y., Components-of-variance models for random-effects ROC analysis: the case of unequal variance structures across modalities. Acad Radiol 8, 605-615 (2001).
21. Cohen, J. A., coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 20, 37-46 (1960).
22. Huo, Z., Giger, M. L., Vyborny, C. J., Metz, C. E., Effectiveness of CAD in the diagnosis of breast cancer: an observer study on an independent database of mammograms. Radiology (in press).
23. Chan, H. P., Doi K., Vyborny, C. J., Schmidt, R. A., Metz, C. E., Lam, K. L., Ogura, T., Wu, Y. Z., MacMahon, H., Improvement in radiologists' detection of clustered microcalcifications on mammograms. The potential of computer-aided diagnosis. Invest Radiol 25, 1102-1110 (1990).
24. Kegelmeyer, W. P., Jr., Pruneda, J. M., Bourland, P. D., Hillis, A., Riggs, M. W., Nipper, M. L., Computer-aided mammographic screening for spiculated lesions. Radiology 191, 331-337 (1994).
25. Freer, T. W., Ulissey, M. J., Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center. Radiology 220, 781-786 (2001).
26. Boyd, N. F., Lockwood, G. A., Martin, L. J., Knight, J. A., Jong, R. A., Fishell, E., Byng, J. W., Yaffe, M. J., Tritchler, D. L., Mammographic densities and risk of breast cancer among subjects with a family history of this disease. J Natl Cancer Inst 91, 1404-1408 (1999).
27. Huo, Z., Giger, M. L., Wolverton, D. E., Zhong, W., Cumming, S., Olopade, O. I., Computerized analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns for breast cancer risk assessment: feature selection. Med Phys 27, 4-12 (2000).