Drawing marks, acts, and reacts: Toward a computational sketching interface for architectural design

Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing: AIEDAM

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 149-171

  Do, Ellen Yi Luen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Architectural Drawing; Design Computing; Design Reasoning; Diagram Symbols; Sketching Interface

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; INTERFACES (COMPUTER); KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION;

COMPUTATIONAL SKETCHING INTERFACES;

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN;

EID: 0036625961     PISSN: 08900604     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0890060402163037     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Akin, O. (1978). How do architects design. In Artificial Intelligence and Pattern Recognition in Computer Aided Design, IFIP (Latombe, E.J.-C., Ed.), pp. 65-104. New York: North-Holland.
2. Akin, O. (1986). Psychology of Architectural Design. London: Pion.
3. Baudel, T. (1994). A mark-based interaction paradigm for free-hand drawing. ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. Marina del Rey, CA: ACM Press.
4. Benedikt, M.L. (1979). To take hold of space: Isovist and isovist fields. Environment and Planning B6, 47-65.
5. Benedikt, M.L. (1984). Perceiving architectural space: From optic arrays to isovists. In Persistence and Change (Warren, H.W., & Shaw, R.E., Eds.), pp. 103-114. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Cross, N., Christiaans, H., & Dorst, K., Eds. (1996). Analyzing Design Activity. New York: Wiley.
7. Davis, L.S., & Benedikt, M.L. (1979). Computational models of space: Isovists and Isovist fields. Computer Graphics and Image Processing 11, 49-72.
8. Do, E.Y.-L. (1995). What's in a diagram that a computer should understand? CAAD Futures '95: The Global Design Studio, Sixth International Conference on Computer Aided Architectural Design Futures (Tan, M., & Teh, R.? Eds.), pp. 469-482. Singapore: National University of Singapore.
9. Do, E.Y.-L. (1998). The right tool at the right time-Investigation of freehand drawing as an interface to knowledge based design tools. PhD dissertation. Atlanta: Georgia Institute of Technology.
10. Do, E.Y.-L. (2001a). Graphics interpreter of design actions: The GIDA system of diagram sorting and analysis. In CAAD Futures 2001 (Vries, B.d., van Leeuwen, J.R, & Achten, H.H., Eds.), pp. 271-284. Eindhoven, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
11. Do, E.Y.-L. (2001b). VR Sketchpad: Creating instant 3D worlds by sketching on a transparency window. In CAAD Futures 2001. (Vries, B.d., van Leeuwen, J.P., & Achten, H.H., Eds.), pp. 161-172. Eindhoven, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
12. Do, E.Y.-L., & Gross, M.D. (1995a). Drawing analogies-Supporting creative architectural design with visual references. In Computational Model of Creative Design (Gero, J., & Maher, M.-L., Eds.), pp. 37-58. Heron Island, Australia: University of Sydney.
13. Do, E.Y.-L., & Gross, M.D. (1995b). Shape based reminding as an aid to creative design. The Global Design Studio, Proc. Sixth Int. Conf. on Computer Aided Architectural Design Futures (Tan, M., & Teh, R., Eds.), pp. 79-90. National University of Singapore, Centre for Advanced Studies in Architecture, Singapore.
14. Do, E.Y.-L., & Gross, M.D. (1997). Tools for visual and spatial analysis of CAD models-Implementing computer tools as a means to thinking about architecture. In CAAD Futures 97 (Junge, R., Ed.), pp. 189-202. Munich: Kluwer.
15. Do, E.Y.-L., Gross, M.D., Zimring, C., & Neiman, B. (2000). Intentions and relations among design drawings. Design Studies 21, 483-503.
16. Do, E.Y.-L., Or, S.-W.D., Carson, D.M., Chang, C.-S., & Hacker, W.C. (1994). Usability Study of a Case-Based Design Aid: Archie. Atlanta: Georgia Institute of Technology.
17. Domeshek, E., & Kolodner, J. (1992). A case-based design aid for architecture. In Artificial Intelligence in Design '92 (Gero, J.S., Ed.). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
18. Dorst, K., & Cross, N. (1995). Protocol analysis as a research technique for analysing design activity. Design Engineering Technical Conf. 2 (DE-83), pp. 563-570. New York: ASME.
19. Eastman, C.M. (1968). On the analysis of intuitive design. In Emerging Methods in Environmental Design and Planning (Moore, G.T., Ed.), pp. 21-37. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. Eisenman, P. (1987). Peter Eisenman House of Cards. New York: Oxford University Press.
21. Forbus, K.D., Ferguson, R.W., & Usher, J.M. (2001). Towards a computational model of sketching. In Int. Conf. on Intelligent User Interfaces, pp. 77-83. New York: ACM Press.
22. Fraser, L., & Henmi, R. (1994). Envisioning Architecture-An Analysis of Drawing. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
23. Galle, P., & Kovács, L.B. (1992). Introspective observations of sketch design. Design Studies 13, 229-272.
24. Gehry, F.O., & IDOM Associates. (1997). Project Diary: Guggenheim Museum Bilbao, Bilbao, Spain-An architect's dream project in Spain's Basque Country brings worldwide attention. Architectural Record 185(10), 74-87.
25. Genau, A., & Kramer, A. (1995). Translucent history. Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 95 Conf. Companion, pp. 250-251.
26. Giovannini, J. (1993). Beyond convention. Architecture: The AIA Journal 82, 52.
27. Goel, V. (1995). Sketches of Thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28. Goldschmidt, G. (1989). Problem representation versus domain of solution in architectural design teaching. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research 6, 204-215.
29. Goldschmidt, G. (1991). The dialectics of sketching. Creativity Research Journal 4, 123-143.
30. Graves, M. (1977). The necessity for drawing: Tangible speculation. Architectural Design 6, 384-394.
31. Gross, M.D. (1996). The Electronic Cocktail Napkin Working with diagrams. Design Studies 17, 53-69.
32. Gross, M.D., & Do, E.Y.-L. (1996). Demonstrating the electronic cocktail napkin: A paper-like interface for early design. CHI 96, Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Conf. Companion, pp. 5-6. Vancouver: ACM Press.
33. Gross, M.D., Do, E.Y.-L., & Johnson, B.R. (2001). The Design Amanuensis: An instrument for multi-modal design capture. In CAAD Futures 2001 (Vries, B.d., van Leeuwen, J.P., & Achten, H.H., Eds.), pp. 1-13. Eindhoven, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
34. Gross, M.D., Zimring, C., & Do, E.Y.-L. (1994). Using diagrams to access a case base of architectural designs. In Artificial Intelligence in Design '94 (Gero, J., Ed.), pp. 129-144. Lausanne, Switzerland: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
35. Herbert, D.M. (1993). Architectural Study Drawings. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
36. Jung, T., & Do, E.Y.-L. (2000). Immersive redliner: Collaborative design in cyber space. ACADIA 2000, Associations of Computer Aided Design in Architecture National Conf. (de Velasco, G.P.V., & Clayton, M., Eds.), pp. 185-194. Washington, DC: ACADIA.
37. Jung, T., Do, E.Y.-L., & Gross, M.D. (1999). Immersive redlining and annotation of 3D design models on the web. Computers in Building (June, '99) Proc. CAAD Futures '99 Conf. (Eastman, C., & Augenbroe, G., Eds.), pp. 81-98. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
38. Jung, T., M.D. Gross and E.Y.-L. Do (2001). Space pen: Annotation and sketching on 3D models on the Internet. In CAAD Futures 2001 (Vries, B.d., van Leeuwen, J.P., & Achten, H.H., Eds.), pp. 257-270. Eindhoven, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
39. Kahn, L.I. (1931). The value and aim in sketching T-Square Club 1, 19.
40. Kolodner, J.L. (1991). Improving human decision-making through case based decision aiding. AI Magazine 12, 52-68.
41. Kolodner, J.L. (1993). Case-Based Reasoning. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
42. Kramer, A. (1994). Translucent patches-Dissolving windows. ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. Marina del Rey, CA: ACM Press.
43. Kramer, A. (1995). Supporting design activities in the written medium. Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 95 Conf. Companion, pp. 61-62.
44. Landay, J.A. (1996). SILK: Sketching interfaces like krazy. Human Factors in Computing, CHI 96 [Television program].
45. Landay, J.A., & Myers, B.A. (1995). Interactive sketching for the early stages of interface design. Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI '95, pp. 43-50. Denver, CO: ACM Press.
46. Laseau, P. (1986). Graphic Problem Solving for Architects and Builders. Boston: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
47. Lawson, B. (1994). Design in Mind. Oxford, UK: Butterworths.
48. Leclercq, P. (2001). Programming and assisted sketching. In CAAD Futures 2001 (Vries, B.d., van Leeuwen, J.P., & Achten, H.H., Eds.), pp. 15-32. Eindhoven, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
49. Matthews, K. (1994). The Great Buildings Collection. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
50. McFadzean, J., Cross, N., & Johnson, J. (1999). Drawing and the solilo-quising of design suppositions. Design Thinking Research Symposium (Porter, W., & Goldschimidt, G., Eds.), pp. 23-35. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
51. McKim, R.H. (1980). Thinking Visually: A Strategy Manual for Problem Solving. Belmont, CA: Lifetime Learning Publications.
52. Newell, A., & Simon, H.A. (1963). GPS: A program that simulates human thought. In Computers and Thought (Feigenbaum, E.A., & Feldman, J., Eds.), pp. 279-296. New York: McGraw Hill.
53. Porter, W. (1988). Notes on the inner logic of designing: Two thought-experiments. Design Studies 9, 169-180.
54. Robbins, E. (1994). Why Architects Draw. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
55. Saund, E., & Moran, T.P. (1994). A perceptually-supported sketch editor. ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. Marina del Rey, CA: ACM Press.
56. Schodek, D.L. (1994). Critical issues in automation based creative design education. Automation Based Creative Design (Tzonis, A., & White, I., Eds.), pp. 447-458. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
57. Schön, D.A. (1985). The Design Studio. London: RIBA Publications.
58. Schön, D.A. (1988). Designing: Rules, types and worlds. Design Studies 9, 181-190.
59. Schön, D.A., & Wiggins, G. (1992). Kinds of seeing and their functions in designing. Design Studies 13, 135-156.
60. Sivaloganathan, S. (1991). Sketching Input for Computer Aided Engineering: Mechanical Engineering. London: City University.
61. Stahovich, T.F. (1996). SketchIT: A sketch interpretation tool for conceptual mechanical design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory.
62. Sutherland, I. (1963). Sketchpad-A graphical man-machine interface, Cambridge, MA: MIT.
63. Sutherland, I.E. (1975). Structure in drawings and the hidden-surface problem. In Reflections on Computer Aids to Design and Architecture (Negroponte, N., Ed.), pp. 73-85. New York: Petrocelli/Charter.
64. Suwa, M., & Tversky, B. (1996). What architects and students see in architectural design sketches: A protocol analysis. First International Symposium on Descriptive Models of Design, Istanbul, Turkey.
65. Taggart, J. (1975). Sketching: An informal dialogue between designer and computer. In Reflections on Computer Aids to Design and Architecture (Negroponte, N., Ed.), pp. 147-162. New York: Petrocelli Charter.
66. Ullman, D.G., Wood, S., & Craig, D. (1990). The importance of drawing in the mechanical design process. Computer Graphics 14, 263-274.
67. Van Sommers, R. (1984). Drawing and Cognition: Descriptive and Experimental Studies of Graphic Production Processes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
68. Zeleznik, R.C., Herndon, K.P., & Hughes, J.F. (1996). Sketch: An interface for sketching 3D scenes. SIGGRAPH '96, pp. 163-170.
69. Zimring, C., Do, E.Y.-L., Domeshek, E., & Kolodner, J. (1995). Supporting case-study use in design education: A computational case-based design aid for architecture. In Computing in Civil Engineering, A/E/C Systems '95 (Mohsen, J.P., Ed.). Vol. II, pp. 1635-1642. Atlanta, GA: American Society of Civil Engineers.