Clinical evaluation of wavelet-compressed digitized screen-film mammography

Academic Radiology

Volumn 7, Issue 5, 2000, Pages 311-316

  Powell, Kimerly A ^a   Mallasch, Paul G ^b   Obuchowski, Nancy A ^a   Kerczewski, Robert J ^b   Ganobcik, Stefan N ^a   Cardenosa, Gilda ^a   Chilcote, William ^a  

^a LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b NASA GLENN RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast radiography; Comparative studies; Diagnostic radiology; Digital; Observer performance; Radiography; Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC)

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST DISEASE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0034077317     PISSN: 10766332     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1076-6332(00)80004-5     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Good WF, Maitz GS, Gur D. Joint photographic experts group (JPEG) compatible data compression of mammograms. J Digit Imaging 1994; 7:123-132.
2. Lucier BJ, Kallergi M, Qian W, et al. Wavelet compression and segmentation of digital mammograms. J Digit Imaging 1994; 7:27-38.
3. Chan HP, Lo SC, Niklason LT, Ikeda DM, Lam KL. Image compression in digital mammography: effects on computerized detection of subtle microcalcifications. Med Phys 1996; 23:1325-1336.
4. Netsch T, Lang M, Peitgen HO. Automated detection of microcalcifications after lossy compression of digital mammograms. In: Karssemeijer N, Thijssen M, Hendriks J, van Erning L, eds. Digital mammography. Nijmegen, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers Netherlands, 1998; 465-472.
5. Perlmutter SM, Cosman PC, Gray RM, et al. Image quality in lossy compressed digital mammograms. Signal Processing, Special Section on Medical Image Compression 1997; 59:189-210.
6. Daubechies I. Orthogonal bases of compactly supported wavelets. Commun Pure Appl Math 1988; 41:909-996.
7. Goldberg MA, Pivovarov M, Mayo-Smith WW, et al. Application of wavelet compression to digitized radiographs. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994; 163:463-468.
8. Neth D, Powell K, Obuchowski N, et al. System considerations for satellite transmission of digitized mammograms. In: Karssemeijer N, Thijssen M, Hendriks J, van Erning L, eds. Digital mammography. Nijmegen, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers Netherlands, 1998; 511-512.
9. D'Orsi CJ, Basset LW, Feig SA, et al. Illustrated breast imaging reporting and data system. 3rd ed. Reston, Va: American College of Radiology, 1998.
10. Powell KA, Obuchowski NA, Chilcote WA, Barry MM, Ganobcik SN, Cardenosa G. Film-screen versus digitized mammography: assessment of clinical equivalency. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 173:889-894.
11. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982; 143:29-36.
12. Obuchowski NA. Nonparametric analysis of clustered ROC curve data. Biometrics 1997; 53:567-578.
13. Beam CA, Wieand HS. A statistical method for the comparison of a discrete diagnostic test with several continuous diagnostic tests. Biometrics 1991; 47:907-919.
14. Efron B. The jackknife, the bootstrap, and other resampling plans. Philadelphia, Pa: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 1982.
15. Rao JN, Scott AJ. A simple method for the analysis of clustered binary data. Biometrics 1992; 48:577-585.
16. Obuchowski NA. On the comparison of correlated proportions for clustered data. Stat Med 1998; 17:1495-1507.
17. Obuchowski NA. Testing for equivalence of diagnostic tests. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 168:13-17.
18. Obuchowski N. Testing for equivalence of diagnostic tests. Presented at the annual meeting of the International Biometric Society, Eastern North American Region, Pittsburgh, Pa, March 31, 1998.
19. Zhang CL, Zheng YF. Packed integer wavelet transform constructed by lifting scheme (abstr). Presented at the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, Phoenix, Ariz, March 1999.