The influence of injected AC and DC currents on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in the bobtail lizard

JARO - Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 200-208

  Manley, Geoffrey A ^a,b   Kirk, Des L ^b  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

Active process; Cochlear amplifier; Lizard hearing; Otoacoustic emissions; SOAE

Indexed keywords

ALTERNATING CURRENT; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; COCHLEA DUCT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIRECT CURRENT; ELECTRICITY; ELECTROSTIMULATION; LIZARD; MAMMAL; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPONTANEOUS OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; TIME; ACTION POTENTIAL; ANIMAL; ELECTRODE; HAIR CELL; PHYSIOLOGY;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ANIMALS; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; ELECTRODES; HAIR CELLS; LIZARDS; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS, SPONTANEOUS;

EID: 0036615524     PISSN: 15253961     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s101620020027     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. BENSER ME, MARQUIS RE, HUDSPETH AJ. Rapid, active hair-bundle movements in hair cells from the bullfrog's sacculus. J. Neurosci. 16:5629-5643, 1996.
2. 2+ to mechanoelectrical-transduction channels. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:15321-15326, 1998.
3. HOFSTETTER P, DING D, SALVI R. Induction of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in chinchillas from carboplatin-induced inner hair cell loss. Hear. Res. 150:132-136, 2000.
4. HUBBARD AE, MOUNTAIN DC. Alternating current delivered into the scala media alters sound pressure at the eardrum. Science 222:510-512, 1983.
5. HUDSPETH AJ. Mechanical amplification of stimuli by hair cells. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 7:480-486, 1997.
6. HUDSPETH AJ, CHOE Y, MEHTA AD, MARTIN P. Putting ion channels to work: Mechanoelectrical transduction, adaptation, and amplification by hair cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:11765-11772, 2000.
7. KÖPPL C. Morphology of the basilar papilla of the bobtail lizard Tiliqua rugosa. Hear. Res. 35:209-228, 1988.
8. KÖPPL C. Otoacoustic emissions as an indicator for active cochlear mechanics: A primitive property of vertebrate auditory organs. In: Manley GA, Klump GM, Köppl C, (eds) Advances in Hearing Research. World Scientific Publishing Singapore, 1995, p. 207-218.
9. KÖPPL C, MANLEY GA. Peripheral auditory processing in the bobtail lizard Tiliqua rugosa: II. Tonotopic organization and innervation pattern of the basilar papilla. J. Comp. Physiol. A 167:101-112, 1990.
10. KÖPPL C, MANLEY GA. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in the bobtail lizard. I: General characteristics. Hear. Res. 71:157-169, 1993.
11. KÖPPL C, MANLEY GA. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in the bobtail lizard. II: Interactions with external tones. Hear. Res. 72:159-170, 1994.
12. KÖPPL C, MANLEY GA, JOHNSTONE BM. Acoustic distortion products in the ear canal of the bobtail lizard. I: General characteristics. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 93:2820-2933, 1993.
13. MANLEY GA. Diversity in hearing-organ structure and the characteristics of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in lizards. In: Lewis ER, Long GR, Lyon RF, Narins PM, Steele CR, (eds) Diversity in Auditory Mechanics. World Scientific Publishing Singapore, 1997, p. 32-38.
14. MANLEY GA. Do non-mammals have a cochlear amplifier? In: Wada H, Takasaka T, Ohyama K, Ikeda K, Koike T, (eds) Recent Developments in Auditory Mechanics. World Scientific Publishing SingaPore, 2000a, p. 499-505.
15. MANLEY GA. Otoacoustic emissions in lizards. In: Manley GA, Fastl H, Kössl M, Oeckinghaus H, Klump GM, (eds) Auditory Worlds: Sensory Analysis and Perception in Animals and Man. Wiley-VCH Weinheim, 2000b, p. 93-102.
16. MANLEY GA. Evidence for an active process and a cochlear amplifier in non-mammals. J. Neurophysiol. 86:541-549 2001.
17. MANLEY GA, KÖPPL C. Acoustic distortion products in the ear canal of the bobtail lizard. II: Suppression tuning characteristics. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 93:2834-2844, 1993.
18. MANLEY GA, KÖPPL C. Phylogenetic development of the cochlea and its innervation. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 8:468-474, 1998.
19. MANLEY GA, KIRK D, KÖPPL C, YATES GK. In-vivo evidence for a cochlear amplifier in the hair-cell bundle of lizards. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:2826-2831, 2001.
20. MARTIN P, HUDSPETH AJ. Active hair-bundle movements can amplify a hair cell's response to oscillatory mechanical stimuli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:14306-14311, 1999.
21. NUTTALL AL. Influence of direct current on DC receptor potentials from cochlear inner hair cells in the guinea pig. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 77:165-175, 1985.
22. RICCI AJ, CRAWFORD AC, FETTIPLACE R. Active hair bundle motion linked to fast transducer adaptation in auditory hair cells. J. Neurosci. 20:7131-7142, 2000.
23. SUN W, DING D, REYES S, SALVI RJ. Effects of AC and DC stimulation on chinchilla SOAE amplitude and frequency. Hear. Res. 150:137-148, 2000.
24. TASCHENBERGER G, GALLO L, MANLEY GA. Filtering of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in the inner ear of birds and lizards. Hear. Res. 91:87-92, 1995.
25. VAN DIJK P, MANLEY GA, GALLO L. Correlated amplitude fluctuations of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in five lizard species. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 104:1559-1564, 1998.
26. WIT HP, VAN DIJK P, SEGENHOUT JM. DC injection and spontaneous otoacoustic emission frequency in the frog. Hear. Res. 41:199-204, 1989.