Phylogenetic development of the cochlea and its innervation

Current Opinion in Neurobiology

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 468-474

  Manley, Geoffrey A ^a   Köppl, Christine ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; COCHLEA; EVOLUTION; HAIR CELL; HEARING; INNERVATION; MOTOR SYSTEM; NONHUMAN; PHYLOGENY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; VERTEBRATE;

EID: 0032143595     PISSN: 09594388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0959-4388(98)80033-0     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Northcutt RG. The phylogeny of octavolateralis ontogenies: a reaffirmation of Garstang's phylogenetic hypothesis. Webster DB, Fay RR, Popper AN. The Evolutionary Biology of Hearing. 1992;21-48 Springer Verlag, New York.
2. Fritzsch B. The water-to-land transition: evolution of the tetrapod basilar papilla, middle ear, and auditory nuclei. Webster DB, Fay RR, Popper AN. The Evolutionary Biology of Hearing. 1992;351-375 Springer Verlag, New York.
3. Fritzsch B. On the role played by ontogenetic remodeling and functional transformation in the evolution of terrestrial hearing. of special interest Brain Behav Evol. 50:1997;38-49 It is suggested that regressive events may not be evolutionary dead ends, but may provide a source of innovations for topologically associated systems. This not only applies to the origin of an ear ossicle from a redundant jaw joint support structure, but also to the origin of the basilar papilla and the possible re-routing of facial neurons to produce inner-ear efferents.
4. Lombard RE. The structure of the amphibian auditory periphery: a unique experiment in terrestrial hearing. Popper AN, Fay RR. Comparative Studies of Hearing in Vertebrates. 1980;121-138 Springer Verlag, New York.
5. Clack JA. The evolution of tetrapod ears and the fossil record. Brain Behav Evol. 50:1997;198-212 A new analysis of fossil tetrapod ears cofirms earlier suggestions that components of the middle ear and perilymphatic system that are necessary for sensitive detection of airborne sounds developed independently in mammal-like reptiles, in archosaurs and lepidosaurs, and probably also in amphibians and turtles.
6. of special interest Lombard RE, Bolt JR. Evolution of the tetrapod ear: an analysis and reinterpretation. Biol J Linn Soc. 11:1979;19-76.
7. Carroll RL. Vertebrate Palaeontology and Evolution. 1987;Freeman, New York.
8. Hennig W. Stammesgeschichte der Chordaten. 1983;Paul Parey, Hamburg. Phylogeny of the chordates.
9. Wilkinson M, Thorley J, Benton MJ. Uncertain turtle relationships. Nature. 387:1997;466.
10. Sneary MG. Auditory receptor of the red-eared turtle: I. General ultrastructure. J Comp Neurol. 276:1988;573-587.
11. Sneary MG. Auditory receptor of the red-eared turtle: II. Afferent and efferent synapses and innervation patterns. J Comp Neurol. 276:1988;588-606.
12. Crawford AC, Fettiplace R. The frequency selectivity of auditory nerve fibres and hair cells in the cochlea of the turtle. J Physiol. 306:1980;79-125.
13. Fettiplace R. Electrical tuning of hair cells in the inner ear. Trends Neurosci. 10:1987;421-425.
14. Wu Y-C, Art JJ, Goodman MB, Fettiplace R. A kinetic description of the calcium-activated potassium channel and its application to electrical tuning of hair cells. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 63:1995;131-158.
15. Manley GA. Peripheral Hearing Mechanisms in Reptiles and Birds. 1990;Springer Verlag, Berlin.
16. Wever EG. The Reptile Ear. 1978;Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
17. Miller MR. The evolutionary implications of the structural variations in the auditory papilla of lizards. Webster DB, Fay RR, Popper AN. The Evolutionary Biology of Hearing. 1992;463-487 Springer Verlag, New York.
18. Köppl C, Manley GA. Functional consequences of morphological trends in the evolution of lizard hearing organs. Webster DB, Fay RR, Popper AN. The Evolutionary Biology of Hearing. 1992;489-510 Springer Verlag, New York.
19. Fischer FP. General pattern and morphological specializations of the avian cochlea. Scanning Microsc. 8:1994;351-364.
20. Dallos P. Overview: cochlear neurobiology. Dallos P, Popper AN, Fay RR. The Cochlea. 1996;1-43 Springer Verlag, New York.
21. Slepecky NB. Structure of the mammalian cochlea. Dallos P, Popper AN, Fay RR. The Cochlea. 1996;44-129 Springer Verlag, New York.
22. Ladhams A, Pickles JO. Morphology of the monotreme organ of Corti and macula lagena. J Comp Neurol. 366:1996;335-347.
23. Corwin JT, Oberholtzer JC. Fish n' chicks: model recipes for hair-cell regeneration? Neuron. 19:1997;951-954.
24. Hudspeth AJ. Mechanical amplification of stimuli by hair cells. of outstanding interest Curr Opin Neurobiol. 7:1997;480-486 The problem of sensitive response to sound in the presence of thermal noise and viscous drag on hair cells is reviewed in a comparative context. The pros and cons for the three potential candidate motor mechanisms are compared in terms of their ability to produce the necessary power at all frequencies.
25. Köppl C. Otoacoustic emissions as an indicator for active cochlear mechanics: a primitive property of vertebrate auditory organs. Manley GA, Klump GM, Köppl C, Fastl H, Oeckinghaus H. Advances in Hearing Research. 1995;207-218 World Scientific Publishing, Singapore.
26. Dallos P, Evans BN. High-frequency motility of outer hair cells and the cochlear amplifier. Science. 267:1995;2006-2009.
27. Dallos P, Evans BN. High-frequency outer hair cell motility: corrections and addendum. Science. 268:1995;1420-1421.
28. Holley MC. Outer hair cell motility. Dallos P, Popper AN, Fay RR. The Cochlea. 1996;386-434 Springer Verlag, New York.
29. Manley GA. The avian hearing organ: a status report. Manley GA, Klump GM, Köppl C, Fastl H, Oeckinghaus H. Advances in Hearing Research. 1995;219-229 World Scientific Publishing, Singapore.
30. Manley GA, Gleich O. Evolution and specialization of function in the avian auditory periphery. Webster DB, Fay RR, Popper AN. The Evolutionary Biology of Hearing. 1992;561-580 Springer Verlag, New York.
31. Assad JA, Corey DP. An active motor model for adaptation by vertebrate hair cells. J Neurosci. 12:1992;3291-3309.
32. Hudspeth AJ, Gillespie PG. Pulling springs to tune transduction: adaptation by hair cells. Neuron. 12:1994;1-9.
33. Manley GA, Gallo L. Otoacoustic emissions, hair cells, and myosin motors. J Acoust Soc Am. 102:1997;1049-1055 Using SOAEs generated by lizard hair cells that lack a tectorial membrane, a simple analysis of the power produced by known numbers of hair cells was carried out. The data are consistent with the notion that hair-cell adaptational myosins could generate the energy in SOAEs.
34. of special interest Yates GK, Kirk D. Cochlear electrically evoked emissions modulated by mechanical transduction channels. J Neurosci. 18:1998;1996-2003 The authors report that low-frequency sound modulates electrically evoked emissions in a way that clearly relates to the opening state of transduction channels. These data are strong evidence that such emissions are generated by mechanisms related to cochlear transduction.
35. of special interest Roberts BL, Meredith GE. The efferent innervation of the ear: variations on an enigma. Webster DB, Fay RR, Popper AN. The Evolutionary Biology of Hearing. 1992;185-210 Springer Verlag, New York.
36. Fritzsch B: Ontogenetic and evolutionary evidence for the motoneuronal nature of vestibular and cochlear efferents. In The Efferent Auditory System: Basic Science and Clinical Applications. Edited by Berlin CI. San Diego: Singular Press; in press.
37. Kaiser A, Manley GA. Physiology of single putative cochlear efferents in the chicken. J Neurophysiol. 72:1994;2966-2979.
38. Warr WB. Organization of olivocochlear efferent systems in mammals. Webster DB, Popper AN, Fay RR. The Mammalian Auditoy Pathway: Neuroanatomy. 1992;410-448 Springer Verlag, New York.
39. Guinan JJJ. Physiology of olivocochlear efferents. Dallos P, Popper AN, Fay RR. The Cochlea. 1996;435-502 Springer Verlag, New York.
40. Walsh EJ, McGee J. Does activity in the olivocochlear bundle affect development of the auditory periphery? Lewis ER, Long G, Lyon RF, Narins PM, Steele CR, Hecht-Poinar E. Diversity in Auditory Mechanics. 1997;376-385 World Scientific Publishing, Singapore.
41. Wit HP, van Dijk P, Segenhout JM. An electrical correlate of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in a frog, a preliminary report. Wilson JP, Kemp DT. Cochlear Mechanism: Structure, Functions and Models. 1989;341-347 Plenum Press, London.
42. Burns EM, Strickland EA, Tubis A, Jones K. Interactions among spontaneous otoacoustic emissions. I. Distortion products and linked emissions. Hear Res. 16:1984;271-278.