A visual equalization strategy for locomotor control: Of honeybees, robots, and humans

Psychological Science

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 272-278

  Duchon, Andrew P ^a   Warren Jr , William H ^a  

^a BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BEE; BEHAVIOR; HUMAN; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PHYSIOLOGY; ROBOTICS; VISION;

ANIMALS; BEES; BEHAVIOR; HUMANS; MOTOR ACTIVITY; ROBOTICS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0036584503     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00450     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Beal, A.C., & Loomis, J.M. (1996). Visual control of steering without course information. Perception, 25, 481-494.
2. Chatziastros, A., Wallis, G.M., & Bülthoff, H.H. (in press). The use of optical flow and splay angle in steering a central path. In A.G. Gale (Ed.), Vision in vehicles VIII. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
3. Coombs, D., Herman, M., Hong, T., & Nashman, M. (1998). Real-time obstacle avoidance using central flow divergence and peripheral flow. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 14, 49-59.
4. Duchon, A., & Warren, W.H. (1994). Robot navigation from a Gibsonian viewpoint. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (pp. 2272-2277). Piscataway, NJ: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
5. Duchon, A.P., & Warren, W.H. (1998). Interaction of two strategies for controlling locomotion. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 39, S892.
6. Duchon, A.P., Warren, W.H., & Kaelbling, L.P. (1998). Ecological robotics. Adaptive Behavior, 6, 473-507.
7. Dyre, B.P., & Andersen, G.J. (1996). Image velocity magnitudes and perception of heading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 546-565.
8. Gibson, J.J. (1958). Visually controlled locomotion and visual orientation in animals. British Journal of Psychology, 49, 182-194.
9. Land, M., & Horwood, J. (1995). Which parts of the road guide steering? Nature, 377, 339-340.
10. Rushton, S.K., Harris, J.M., Lloyd, M., & Wann, J.P. (1998). Guidance of locomotion on foot uses perceived target location rather than optic flow. Current Biology, 8, 1191-1194.
11. Santos-Victor, J., Sandini, G., Curotto, F., & Giribaldi, S. (1995). Divergent stereo in autonomous navigation: From bees to robots. International Journal of Computer Vision, 14, 159-177.
12. Schöner, G., Dose, M., & Engels, C. (1995). Dynamics of behavior: Theory and applications for autonomous robot architectures. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 16, 213-245.
13. Srinivasan, M.V., Lehrer, M., Kirchner, W., & Zhang, S.W. (1991). Range perception through apparent image speed in freely-flying honeybees. Visual Neuroscience, 6, 519-535.
14. Warren, W.H. (1998a). The state of flow. In T. Watanabe (Ed.), High-level motion processing (pp. 315-358). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. Warren, W.H. (1998b). Visually controlled locomotion: 40 years later. Ecological Psychology, 10, 177-219.
16. Warren, W.H., Kay, B.A., Zosh, W.D., Duchon, A.P., & Sahuc, S. (2001). Optic How is used to control human walking. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 213-216.
17. Weber, K., Venkatesh, S., & Srinivasan, M.V. (1997). Insect inspired behaviours for the autonomous control of mobile robots. In M.V. Srinivasan & S. Venkatesh (Eds.), From living eyes to seeing machines (pp. 226-248). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.