Language and power: Ascribing legitimacy to interpretive research

Qualitative Health Research

Volumn 12, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 713-720

  Ceci, Christine ^a   Limacher, Lori Houger ^a,b   McLeod, Deborah L ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^b CALGARY HEALTH REGION   (Canada)

^c DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; EVALUATION; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; LANGUAGE; REPRODUCIBILITY; RESEARCH; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY;

COMMUNICATION; EVALUATION STUDIES; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; POWER (PSYCHOLOGY); REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RESEARCH; SOCIAL VALUES;

EID: 0036582581     PISSN: 10497323     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/104973202129120106     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Caputo, J. D. (1987). Radical lienneneutics: Repetition, deconstniction, and the henneneutic project. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
2. Caputo, J. D. (1993). Against ethics: Contributions to a poetics of obligation with constant reference to deconstniction. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
3. Ceci, C. (2000). Not innocent: Relationships between knowers and knowledge. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, 32(2), 57-73.
4. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5. Foucault, M. (1973). The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences. New York: Vintage.
6. Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972-1977 (C. Gordon, Ed.; and C. Gordon, L. Marshal, J. Mepham, & K. Soper, Trans.). New York: Pantheon.
7. Cuba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1981). Effective evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
8. Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575-599.
9. Keller, E. K., & Longino, H. E. (Eds.). (1996). Feminism and science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10. Koch, T. (1994). Establishing rigour in qualitative research: The decision trail. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 19,976-986.
11. Koch, T. (1996). Implementation of a hermeneutic inquiry in nursing: Philosophy, rigour and representation. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 24,174-184.
12. Lather, P. (1992). Critical frames in educational research: Feminist and post-structuralist perspectives. Theory Into Practice, 31(2), 87-99.
13. Lather, P. (1993). Fertile obsession: Validity after poststructuralism. Sociological Quarterly, 34(4), 673-693.
14. Lennon, K., & Whitford, M. (1994). Introduction. In K. Lennon & M. Whitford (Eds.), Knowing the difference: Feminist perspectives in epistemologies (pp. 1-14). New York: Routledge.
15. Mischler, E. G. (1990). Validation in inquiry-guided research: The role of exemplars in narrative studies. Harvard Educational Review, 60(4), 415-442.
16. Sandelowski, M. (1986). The problem of rigor in qualitative research. Advances in Nursing Science, 8(3), 2737.
17. Sandelowski, M. (1993). Rigor or rigor mortis: The problem of rigor in qualitative research revisited. Advances in Nursing Science, 16(2), 1-8.
18. Sandelowski, M. (1994). The proof is in the pottery: Towards a poetic for qualitative inquiry. In J. Morse (Ed.), Critical issues in qualitative research methods (pp. 46-63). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19. Sandelowski, M. J. (1996). Truth/storytelling in nursing inquiry. In J. F. Kikuchi, H. Simmons, & D. Romyn (Eds.), Truth in nursing inquiry (pp. 111-124). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20. Sandelowski, M. (1998). The call to experts in qualitative research. Research in Nursing and Health, 21,467471.
21. Smith, J. K. (1984). The problem of criteria for judging interpretive inquiry. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 6(4), 379-391.
22. Tanesini, A. (1999). An introduction to feminist epistemologies. Oxford: Blackwell.
23. Weedon, C. (1987). Feminist practice and poststructuralist theory. Oxford: Blackwell.