Not Innocent: Relationships between Knowers and Knowledge

Canadian Journal of Nursing Research

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 57-73

  Ceci, Christine ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; KNOWLEDGE; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; PHILOSOPHY; RESEARCH;

HUMANS; KNOWLEDGE; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; PHILOSOPHY, NURSING; RESEARCH;

EID: 0034277385     PISSN: 08445621     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Campbell, R. (1994). The virtues of feminist empiricism. Hypatia, 9(1), 90-115.
2. Caputo, J. (1987). Radical hermeneutics: Repetition, deconstruction and the hermeneutic project. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
3. Collins, P. (1997). Comment on Hekman's "Truth and method: Feminist standpoint theory revisited": Where's the power? Signs, 22(2), 375-381.
4. Gadow, S. (1990). Beyond dualism: The dialectic of caring and knowing. Paper presented to the conference "The Care-Justice Puzzle: Education for Ethical Nursing Practice," University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
5. Gorham, G. (1995). The concept of truth in the feminist sciences. Hypatia, 10(3), 99-116.
6. Gortner, S. (1993/1999). Nursing's syntax revisited: A critique of philosophies said to influence nursing. In E.G. Polifroni & M. Welch (Eds.), Perspectives in philosophy of science in nursing: An historical and contemporary anthology (pp. 154-165). Philadelphia: Lippincott.
7. Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575-599.
8. Harding, S. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women's lives. New York: Cornell University Press.
9. Harding, S. (1992/1999). After the neutrality ideal: Science, politics and "strong objectivity." In E.G. Polifroni & M. Welch (Eds.), Perspectives in philosophy of science in nursing: An historical and contemporary anthology (pp. 451-461). Philadelphia: Lippincott.
10. Lennon, K., & Whitford, M. (1994). Introduction. In K. Lennon & M. Whitford (Eds.), Knowing the difference: Feminist perspectives in epistemology (pp. 1-14). New York: Routledge.
11. Leonard, V. (1989/1999). A Heideggerian phenomenologic perspective on the concept of the person. In B.C. Polifroni & M. Welch (Eds.), Perspectives in philosophy of science in nursing: An historical and contemporary anthology (pp. 315-327). Philadelphia: Lippincott.
12. Longino, H. (1996). Can there be a feminist science? In A. Carry & M. Pearsall (Eds.), Women, knowledge and reality (2nd ed.) (pp. 251-263). New York: Routledge.
13. Mills, C. (1988). Alternative epistemologies. Social Theory and Practice, 14(3), 237-263.
14. Okruhlik, K. (1994). Gender and the biological sciences. Biology and Society, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 20(suppl), 21-42.
15. Strickland, S. (1994). Feminism, postmodernism and difference. In K. Lennon & M. Whitford (Eds.), Knowing the difference: Feminist perspectives in epistemology (pp. 265-274). New York: Routledge.
16. Vasterling, V. (1999). Butler's sophisticated contructivism: A critical assessment. Hypatia, 14(3), 17-38.