It's easy to like or dislike Tony Blair: Accessibility experiences and the favourability of attitude judgments

British Journal of Psychology

Volumn 93, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 257-267

  Haddock, Geoffrey ^a  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PERCEPTION; PHYSIOLOGY; POLITICS; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RECALL; STUDENT; UNITED KINGDOM;

ADULT; ATTITUDE; FEMALE; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; POLITICS; SOCIAL PERCEPTION; STUDENTS;

EID: 0036582524     PISSN: 20448295     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1348/000712602162571     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Abelson, R. P., Kinder, D. R., Peters, M. D., & Fiske, S. T. (1982). Affective and semantic components in political person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 619-630.
2. Bassili, J. N. (1996). Meta-judgmental versus operative indexes of psychological attributes: The case of measures of attitude strength. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 637-653.
3. Bless, H., & Forgas, J. P. (Eds.) (2000). The message within: The role of subjective states in social cognition and behavior (pp. 125-142). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
4. Bodenhausen, G. V. (1993). Emotions, arousal, and stereotypic judgments: A heuristic model of affect and stereotyping. In D. M. Mackie & D. L. Hamilton (Eds.), Affect, cognition, and stereotyping: Interactive processes in group perception (pp. 13-37). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
5. Chaiken, S., Liberman, A., & Eagly, A. H. (1989). Heuristic and systematic processing within and beyond the persuasion context. In J. S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 212-252). New York: Guilford Press.
6. Dijksterhuis, A., Macrae, C. N., & Haddock, G. (1999). When recollective experiences matter: Subjective ease of retrieval and stereotyping. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 760-768.
7. Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Forth Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
8. Fazio, R. H., & Williams, C. J. (1986). Attitude accessibility as a moderator of the attitude-perception and attitude-behaviour relations: An investigation of the 1984 presidential election. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 505-514.
9. Haddock, G. (2000). Subjective experiences and attitude-relevant judgements. In H. Bless & J. P. Forgas (Eds.), The message within: The role of subjective states in social cognition and behavior (pp. 125-142). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
10. Haddock, G., Rothman, A. J., Reber, R., & Schwarz, N. (1999). Forming judgements of attitude certainty, intensity, and importance: The role of subjective experiences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 770-781.
11. Haddock, G., Rothman, A. J., & Schwarz, N. (1996). Are (some) reports of attitude strength context dependent? Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 28, 313-316.
12. Hastie, R., & Park, B. (1986). The relationship between memory and judgement depends on whether the judgement is memory-based or on-line. Psychological Review, 93, 258-268.
13. Hodges, S. D., & Wilson, T. D. (1993). Effects of analyzing reasons on attitude change: The moderating role of attitude accessibility. Social Cognition, 11, 353-366.
14. Isbell, L. M., & Wyer, R. S., Jr. (1999). Correcting for mood-induced bias in the evaluation of political candidates: The roles of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 237-249.
15. Iyengar, S., & Ottati, V. (1994). Cognitive perspective in political psychology. In R. S. Wyer, Jr. & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (Vol. 2, pp. 143-187). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. Kinder, D. R. (1998). Opinion and action in the realm of politics. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 778-867). Boston, MA: McGraw Hill.
17. Kraus, S. J. (1995). Attitudes and the prediction of behavior: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 58-75.
18. Krosnick, J. A. (1988). Attitude importance and attitude change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 240-255.
19. Lavine, H., Huff, J. W., Wagner, S. H., & Sweeney, D. (1998). The moderating influence of attitude strength on the susceptibility to context effects in attitude surveys. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 359-373.
20. Ottati, V., & Isbell, L. M. (1996). Effects of mood during exposure to target information and subsequently reported judgements: An on-line model of misattribution and correction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 39-53.
21. Ottati, V., Steenbergen, M., & Higgle, E. (1992). The cognitive and affective components of political attitudes: Measuring the determinants of candidate evaluation. Political Behaviour, 14, 423-442.
22. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, R. E. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 123-205). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
23. Rothman, A. J., & Hardin, C. (1997). Differential use of the availability heuristic in social judgement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 123-138.
24. Rothman, A. J., & Schwarz, N. (1998). Constructing perceptions of vulnerability: Personal relevance and the use of experiential information in health judgements. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1053-1064.
25. Schwarz, N. (1998). Accessible content and accessibility experiences: The interplay of declarative and experiential information in judgement. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 87-99.
26. Schwarz, N., Bless, H., Strack, F., Klumpp, G., Rittenauer-Schatka, H., & Simons, A. (1991). Ease of retrieval as information: Another look at the availability heuristic. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 195-202.
27. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207-232.
28. Wänke, M., Bless, H., & Biller, B. (1996). Subjective experience versus content of information in the construction of attitude judgements. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 1105-1113.
29. Wänke, M., Bohner, G., & Jurkowitsch, A. (1997). There are many reasons to drive a BMW: Does ease of argument generation influence brand attitudes? Journal of Consumer Research, 24, 170-177.
30. Wilson, T. D., & Hodges, S. D. (1992). Attitudes as constructions. In L. L. Martin & A. Tesser (Eds.), The construction of social judgment (pp. 37-65). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
31. Wilson, T. D., Kraft, D., & Dunn, D. S. (1989). The disruptive effects of explaining attitudes: The moderating effects of knowledge about the attitude object. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 379-400.
32. Wilson, T. D., Lindsey, S., & Schooler, T. Y. (2000). A model of dual attitudes. Psychological Review, 107, 101-126.
33. Winkielman, P., Schwarz, N., & Belli, R. F. (1998). The impact of ease of retrieval and attribution on memory judgements: Judging your memory as worse despite recalling more events. Psychological Science, 9, 124-126.