Re: Importance of lymphatic mapping in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): Why map DCIS? [3]

American Surgeon

Volumn 68, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 500-502

  Cox, Charles E ^a   Jakub, James W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BREAST DISEASE; CANCER INVASION; CARCINOMA IN SITU; GENE MAPPING; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; LETTER; MASTECTOMY; MORBIDITY; NECROSIS; NEEDLE BIOPSY; PARTIAL MASTECTOMY; PROGNOSIS; QUESTIONNAIRE; SENTINEL LYMPH NODE BIOPSY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; BREAST TUMOR; FEMALE; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; NOTE; PAGET NIPPLE DISEASE; PATHOLOGY;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA, INTRADUCTAL, NONINFILTRATING; FEMALE; HUMANS; LYMPHATIC METASTASIS; SENTINEL LYMPH NODE BIOPSY;

EID: 0036581109     PISSN: 00031348     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Letter

References (7)

1. Cox CE, Nguyen K, Gray RJ, et al. Importance of lymphatic mapping in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): Why map DCIS? Am Surg 2001;67:513-9.
2. Brenin DR. Review: Importance of lymphatic mapping in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): Why map DCIS?" Br Dis: Yearbook Q 2002;12:424-5.
3. Klauber-DeMore N, Tan LK, Liberman L, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy: Is it indicated in patients with high-risk ductal carcinoma-in situ and ductal carcinoma-in-situ with microinvasion? Ann Surg Oncol 2000;7:636-42.
4. Burak WE Jr, Owens KE, Tighe MB, et al. Vacuum-assisted stereotactic breast biopsy: Histologic underestimation of malignant lesions. Arch Surg 2000;135:700-3.
5. Lee CH, Carter, D, Philpotts SE, et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed with stereotactic core needle biopsy: Can invasion be predicted? Radiology 2000;217:466-70.
6. Rosenfield Darling ML, Smith DN, Lester SC, et al. Atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ as revealed by large-core needle breast biopsy: Results of surgical excision. Am J Roentgenol 2000;175:1341-6.
7. Jackman RJ, Nowels KW, Rodriguez-Soto, et al. Stereotactic, automated, large-core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: False-negative and histologic underestimation rates after long-term follow-up. Radiology 1999;210:799-805.