Articulation of extreme formant patterns for emphasized vowels

Phonetica

Volumn 59, Issue 2-3, 2002, Pages 134-149

  Erickson, Donna ^a  

^a Gifu City Women's College   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PHONETICS; PHYSIOLOGY; SPEECH; SPEECH ANALYSIS;

FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHONETICS; SPEECH; SPEECH ACOUSTICS; SPEECH PRODUCTION MEASUREMENT;

EID: 0036528352     PISSN: 00318388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000066067     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Beckman, M.E.; Edwards, J.: Articulatory evidence for differentiating stress categories; in Keating, Papers in Laboratory Phonology, pp. 7-33 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1994).
2. Beckman, M.E.; Edwards, J.; Fletcher, J.: Prosodic structure and tempo in a sonority model of articulatory dynamics: in Docherty, Ladd, Papers in Laboratory Phonology. II: Segment, gesture, prosody, pp. 68-86 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1992).
3. Dang, J.; Honda, K.: Speech production of vowel sequences using a physiological articulatory model. Int. Longr. Speech Lang. Proc. 5: 1767-1770 (1998).
4. Dang, J.; Honda, K.: A physiological amodel of a dynamic vocal tract for speech production. Acoust. Sic. and Tech. 22, 6, 415-425 (2001).
5. Dang, J.; Honda, K.: Estimation of vocal tract shape from sounds via a physiological articulatory model (in press).
6. Edwards, J.; Beckman, M.E.; Fletcher, J.: Articulatory kinematics of final lengthening. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 89: 369-382 (1991).
7. Erickson, D.: Effects of contrastive emphasis on jaw opening. Phonetica 55: 147-169 (1998).
8. Erickson, D.; Fujimura, O.; Dang, J.: Emphasized vs. unemphasized /aJ/: Jaw, tongue and formants. Acustica 85: suppl 1, p. 1354 (1999a).
9. Erickson, D.; Fujimura, O.; Dang, J.: Articulatory and acoustic characteristics of emphasized and unemphasized vowels. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 106, 2241 (1999b).
10. Erickson, D.; Hashi, M.; Maekawa, K.: Articulatory and acoustic correlates of prosodic contrasts: a comparative study of vowels in Japanese and English. J. acoust. Soc. Japan 56: 265-266 (2000a).
11. Erickson, D.; Maekawa, K.; Hashi, M.; Dang, J.: Some articulatory and acoustic changes associated with emphasis in spoken English. Int. Congr. Speech Lang. Proc. Vol. 3, 247-250 (2000b).
12. Fant, G.: Acoustic theory of speech production (Mouton, The Hague 1970).
13. Fant, G.: The voice source in connected speech. Speech Communi. 22: 125-139 (1997).
14. Fant, G.: The source-filter frame of prosody. Phonetica 57: 113-127 (2000).
15. Fujimura, O.: Phonology and phonetics: a syllable based model of articulatory organization. J. acoust. Soc. Japan 13: 39-48 (1992).
16. Fujimura, O.: C/D model: a computational model of phonetic implementation; in Ristad, Language computations, pp. 1-20 (American Mathematical Society, Providence 1994).
17. Fujimura, O.: Syllable structure constraints: a C/D model perspective; in Agbayani, Harada, Proc. SWOT-II, Working Papers in Linguistics, UC Irvine, pp. 59-74 (Department of Linguistics, UC Irvine 1996).
18. Fujimura, O.: Neuromusculature simulation and linguistic control. Bull. Com. parlée 4: 59-63 (1998).
19. Fujimura, O.: The C/D model and prosodic control of articulatory behavior. Phonetica 57: 128-138 (2000).
20. Fujimura, O.; Ishida, H.; Kiritani, S.: Computer-controlled radiography for observation of movements of articulatory and other human organs. Comp. Biol. Med. 3: 371-384 (1973).
21. Fujimura, O.; Kakita, Y.: Remarks on quantitative description of the lingual articulation; in Lindblom, Öhman, Frontiers of speech communication research, pp. 17-24 (Academic Press, London 1979).
22. Fujimura, O.; Pardo, B.; Erickson, D.: Effect of emphasis and irritation on jaw opening. Proc. Eur. Speech Community Assoc. Conf. on Sound Patterns of Spontaneous Speech: Production and Perception (ESCA), Aix-en-Provence 1998, pp. 23-29.
23. Fujimura, Q.; Williams, C.J.: Syllable concatenators in English, Japanese and Spanish; in Fujimura, Joseph, Pale, Item order: proceedings of LP'98, pp. 461-498 (Charles University Press, Prague 1999).
24. Harrington, J.; Fletcher, J.; Beckman, M.: Manner and place conflicts in the articulation of accent in Australian English; in Broe, Pierrehumbert, Papers in Laboratory Phonology. V: Language acquisition and the lexicon, pp. 40-51 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2000).
25. Honda, K.: Organization of tongue articulation for vowels. J. Phonet. 24: 39-52 (1996).
26. Jong, K. de: The supraglottal articulation of prominence in English: linguistic stress as localized hyperarticulation. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 97: 491-504 (1995).
27. Jong, K. de; Beckman, M.E.; Edwards, J.: The interplay between prosodic structure and coarticulation. Lang. Speech 36: 197-212 (1993).
28. Kiritani, S.; Itoh, K.; Fujimura, O.: Tongue-pellet tracking by a computer-controlled X-ray microbeam system. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 57: 1516-1520 (1975).
29. Laboissière, R.; Ostry, D.; Feldman, A.: The control of human jaw and hyoid movement. Biol. Cybernetics 74: 373-384 (1996).
30. Ladefoged, P.: Some possibilities in speech synthesis. Lang. Speech 7: 205-214 (1964).
31. Ladefoged, P.; DeClerck, J.; Harshman, R.: Contol of the tongue in vowels. Proc. 7th Int. Congr. Phonet. Sci., 1972b, pp. 349-354.
32. Ladefoged, P.; DeClerck, J.; Lindau, M.; Papçun, G.: An auditory-motor theory of speech production. Univ. Calif. Los Angeles Working Papers Phonet. 22: 48-75 (1972a).
33. Lindblom, B.: Explaining phonetic variation: a sketch of the H&H theory; in Hardcastle, Marchal, Speech production and speech modelling, pp. 403-440 (Kluwer, Dordrecht 1990).
34. Lindblom, B.; Sundberg, J.: Acoustical consequences of lip, tongue, jaw, and larynx movement. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 50: 1166-1179 (1971).
35. Loevenbruck, H.: An investigation of articulatory correlates of the accentual phrase in French. Proc. 14th Int. Congr. Phonet. Sci., San francisco, 1999, vol. 1, pp. 667-670.
36. Macchi, M.: Labial articulation patterns associated with segmental features and syllable structure in English. Phonetica 45: 109-121 (1988).
37. Maeda, S.: A digital simulation method of vocal-tract system. Speech Commun. 1: 199-299 (1982).
38. Maeda, S.: Compensatory articulation during speech: evidence from the analysis and synthesis of vocal tract tract shapes using an articulatory model; in Hardcastle, Marchal, Speech production and speech modelling, pp. 131-149 (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht 1990).
39. Maeda, S.: On articulatory and acoustic variabilities. J. Phonet. 19: 321-331 (1991).
40. Maeda, S.; Honda, K.: From EMG to formant patterns of vowels: the implication of vowel systems spaces. Phonetica 51: 17-29 (1994).
41. Maeda, S.; Honda, K.: Articulatory coordination and its neurobiological aspects; in van Heuven, Pols, Speech production in language. In honor of Osamu Fujimura, pp. 215-228 (Mouton de Gruyter, New York 1997).
42. Maekawa, K.; Kiritoni, S.; Imagawa, H.; Honda, K.: Effects of focus on mandible movement. J. acoust. Soc. Japan 54: 259-260 (1998).
43. Mitchell, C.J.; Menezes, C.; Williams, J.C.; Pardo, B.; Erickson, D.; Fujimura, O.: Changes in syllable and boundary strengths due to irritation. ISCA Workshop on Speech and Emotion, Belfast, 2000.
44. Nadler, R.D.; abbs, J.H.; Fujimura, O.: Speech movement research using the new X-ray microbeam system. Proc. 11th Int Congr. Phonet. Sci., Tallinn 1987, vol. 1, pp. 221-224.
45. Ohman, S.E.G.: Numerical model of coarticulation. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 39: 151-168 (1967).
46. Perkell, J.: Physiology of speech production (MIT Press, Cambridge 1969).
47. Perkell, J.: Articulatory processes; in Hardcastle, Laver, The handbook of phonetic sciences, pp. 333-370 (Blackwell, Cambridge 1997).
48. Perrier, P.; Ostry, D.; Laboissière, R.: The equilibrium point hypothesis and its application to speech motor control. J. Speech Hear. Res 39: 365-378 (1996).
49. Schulman, R.: Articulatory dynamics of loud and normal speech. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 85: 295-312 (1989).
50. Stevens, K.N.: Airflow and turbulence noise for fricative and stop consonants: static considerations. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 50: 1180-1192 (1971).
51. Stevens, K.N.: The quantal nature of speech: evidence from articulatory-acoustic data; in David, Denes, Human communications: a unified view, pp. 51-66 (McGraw-Hill, New york 1972).
52. Stevens, K.N.: Articulatory-acoustic-auditory relationships; in Hardcastle, Laver, The handbook of phonetic sciences, pp. 462-506 (Blackwell, Cambridge 1997).
53. Stone, M.: Evidence for a rhythm pattern in speech production: observations of jaw movement. J. Phonet. 9: 109-120 (1981).
54. Summers, W.V.: Effects of stress and final-consonant voicing on vowel production: articulatory and acoustic analyses. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 82: 847-863 (1987).
55. Westbury, J.R.: The significance and measurement of head position during speech production experiments using the X-ray microbeam system. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 89: 1782-1791 (1991).
56. Westbury, J.R.; Fujimura, O.: An articulatory characterization of contrastive emphasis. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 85: S98 (1989).