Effects of Contrastive Emphasis on Jaw Opening

Phonetica

Volumn 55, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 147-169

  Erickson, Donna ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; JAW; MALE; PHONETICS; PHYSIOLOGY; SPEECH; SPEECH ANALYSIS;

FEMALE; HUMANS; JAW; MALE; PHONETICS; SPEECH; SPEECH PRODUCTION MEASUREMENT;

EID: 0031608480     PISSN: 00318388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000028429     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Beckman, M.E.: The parsing of prosody. Lang. Cogn. Processes 11: 17-67 (1996).
2. Beckman, M.E.; Edwards, J.: Intonational categories and the articulatory control of duration; in Tohkura, Vatikiotis-Bateson, Sagisaka, Speech perception, production and linguistic structure, pp. 359-375 (Ohmsha IOS Press, Osaka 1992].
3. Beckman, M.E.; Edwards, J.; Fletcher, J.: Prosodic structure and tempo in a sonority model of articulatory dynamics; in Docherty, Ladd, Papers in laboratory phonology II: segment, gesture, prosody, pp. 68-86 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1992).
4. Cutler, A.; Butterfield, S.: Rhythmic cues to speech segmentation: evidence from juncture misinterpretation. J. Memory Lane. 31: 218-236 (1992).
5. Edwards, J.; Beckman, M.; Fletcher, J.: The articulatory kinematics of final lengthening. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 89: 369-382 (1991).
6. Erickson, D.; Fujimura, O.: On defining emphasis. 5th Conf. on Lab. Phonol., Northwestern University, Chicago 1996a.
7. Erickson, D.; Fujimura, O.: Maximum jaw displacement in contrastive emphasis. Proc. ICSLP96, Philadelphia 1996b, vol. 1, pp. 141-144.
8. Erickson, D.; Fujimura, O.; Pardo, B.: Articulatory correlates of prosodic control: emotion and emphasis. Lang. Speech (in press).
9. Erickson, D.; Lehiste, I.: Contrastive emphasis in elicited dialogue: durational compensation. Proc. 13th Int. Congr. Phonet. Sci., Stockholm, 1995, vol. 4, pp. 352-355.
10. Erickson, D.; Lenzo, K.; Fujimura, O.: Manifestations of contrastive emphasis in jaw movement. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 95: 2822 (1994).
11. Fox, R.; Josephson, J.: An abductive articulatory recognition system. Lab. for Artifical Intelligence Res. Tech. Rep. (Ohio State University, Columbus 1992).
12. Fox, R.; Josephson, J.; Erickson, D.: An abductive articulatory system: a preliminary study. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 90: 2311 (1991).
13. Fox, R.K.: Layered abduction for speech recognition from articulation: doct.diss. The Ohio State University (unpublished, 1992).
14. Fujimura, O.: A linear model of speech timing; in Channon, Shockey, In honor of Ilse Lehiste, pp. 109-123 (Foris Publications, Providence 1987).
15. Fujimura, O.: Phonology and phonetics: a syllable-based model of articulatory organization. J. acoust. Soc. Japan (E) 13: 39-48 (1992).
16. Fujimura, O.: C/D model: a computational model of phonetic implementation; in Ristad, Language computations, pp. 1-20 (American Mathematical Society Providence 1994).
17. Fujimura, O.: The syllable: its internal structure and role in prosodic organization; in Palek, Proceedings of LP'94: Item Order in (Natural) Languages, pp. 53-93 (Charles University Press, Prague 1995).
18. Fujimura, O.; Erickson, D.: Prosodic organization of speech signals: recent development in the C/D model. Sigphon, Santa Cruz 1996.
19. Fujimura, O.; Erickson, D.: Acoustic phonetics; in Hardcastle, Laver, The handbook of phonetic sciences, pp. 65-115 (Blackwell, Oxford 1997).
20. Fujimura, O.; Ishida, H.; Kiritani, S.: Computer-controlled radiography for observation of movements of articulatory and other human organs. Comp. Biol. Med. 3: 371-384 (1973).
21. Harrington, J.; Fletcher, J.; Beckman, M.E.: Manner and place conflicts in the articulation of accent in Australian English; in Broe, Pierrehumbert, Papers in Lab. Phonol. 5 (in press).
22. Harrington, J.; Palethorpe, S.; Fletcher, J.; Beckman, M.E.: Competing hypotheses concerning the articulation of stress in English. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 99: 2494 (1996).
23. Hattori, S.: Prosodeme, syllable structure and laryngeal phonemes. 1st World Congr. Phoneticians, Tokyo 1960.
24. Hattori, S.: The surface prosodeme, the base prosodeme, and the intonation-pattern of prosodeme, Sci. Lang. J. Tokyo Inst. for Adv. Stud. Lang., pp. 71-96 (1979).
25. House, J.; Hawkins, S.: An integrated phonological-phonetic model for text-to-speech synthesis. Proc. 13th Int. Congr. Phonet. Sci., Stockholm 1995, vol. 2, pp. 326-329.
26. Jong, K. de: The supraglottal articulation of prominence in English: linguistic stress as localized hyperarticulation. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 97: 491-504 (1995).
27. Jong, K. de; Beckman, M.E.; Edwards, J.: The interplay between prosodic structure and coarticulation. Lang. Speech 36: 197-212 (1993).
28. Kahn, D.: Syllable-based generalizations in English phonology (Garland Publishing, New York 1980).
29. Kiritani, S.; Itoh, K.; Fujimura, O.: Tongue-pellet tracking by a computer-controlled x-ray microbeam system. J acoust. Soc. Am. 57: 1516-1520 (1975).
30. Kozhevnikov, V.A.; Chistovich, L.A.: Speech: articulation and perception (Moscow-Leningrad). (Translated by Joint Publications Research Service, Washington, No. JPRS 30.543, 1965.)
31. Lehiste, I.: Suprasegmentals (MIT Press, Cambridge 1970).
32. Lenzo, K.; Erickson, D.: Measuring articulatory tract motion. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 95: 2818 (1994).
33. Liberman, M.; Prince, A.: On stress and linguistic rhythm. Ling. Inquiry 8: 249-336 (1977).
34. Lieberman, P.: Intonation, perception and language (MIT Press, Cambridge 1967).
35. Lindblom, B.: Economy of speech gestures; in MacNeilage, The production of speech, pp. 217-245 (Springer, New York 1983).
36. Macchi, M.: Segmental and suprasegmental features and lip and jaw articulations; duct. diss. New York University (unpublished, 1985).
37. Macchi, M.: Labial articulation patterns associated with segmental features and syllable structure in English. Phonetica 45: 109-121 (1988).
38. MacNeilage, P.F.: The frame/content theory of evolution of speech production. Brain Behav. Sci. (in press).
39. Maekawa, K.: Effects of focus on duration and formant frequency in Japanese; in Sagisaka, Campbell, Higuchi, Computing prosody, pp. 129-153 (Springer, New York 1997).
40. Nadler, R.; Abbs, J.H.; Fujimura, O.: Speech movement research using the new x-ray microbeam system. Proc. 11th Int. Congr. Phonet. Sci., Tallinn 1987, vol. 1, pp. 221-224.
41. Nooteboom, S.: The prosody of speech: melody and rhythm; in Hardcastle, Laver, The handbook of phonetic sciences, pp. 640-673 (Blackwell, Oxford 1997).
42. Patel, A.D.; Löfqvist, A.; Naito, W.: The acoustics and kinematics of regularly-timed speech: testing an information-based theory of speech timing. J. acoust. Soc. Am. (in press).
43. Pierrehumbert, J.; Beckman, M.E.: Japanese tone structure (MIT Press, Cambridge 1988).
44. Poser, J.P.: The phonetics and phonology of tone and intonation in Japanese; doct. diss. MIT (unpublished, 1984).
45. Selkirk, E.O.: The syllable (Foris, Dordrecht 1982).
46. Stetson, R.H.: Motor phonetics (North-Holland, Amsterdam 1951).
47. Summers, W.V.: Effects of stress and final consonant voicing on vowel production: articulatory and acoustic analyses. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 82: 847-863 (1987).
48. Vatikiotis-Bateson, E.; Kelso, J.A.S.: Rhythm type and articulatory dynamics in English, French, and Japanese. ATR Auditory and Visual Perception Res. Lab., Tech. Rep. (TR-A-0147) (1992).
49. Westbury, J.: The significance and measurement of head position during speech production experiments using the x-ray mierobeam system. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 89: 1782-1791 (1991).
50. Westbury, J.; Fujimura, O.: An articulatory characterization of contrastive emphasis. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 85: S98 (1989).