Public support for ecosystem restoration in the Hudson River Valley, USA

Environmental Management

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 467-476

  Connelly, Nancy A ^a   Knuth, Barbara A ^a   Kay, David L ^a  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

Author keywords

Contingent valuation; Ecosystem restoration; Environmental beliefs; Hudson River; Restoration attitudes

Indexed keywords

ECOSYSTEMS; RIVERS; SOCIAL ASPECTS;

SOCIODEMOGRAPHY;

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT;

ATTITUDINAL SURVEY; CONTINGENT VALUATION; ENVIRONMENTALISM; RESTORATION ECOLOGY; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

BEHAVIOR; DEMOGRAPHY; ECONOMIC ASPECT; ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; REVIEW; RIVER ECOSYSTEM; SOCIAL SUPPORT; UNITED STATES; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ECOSYSTEM; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MIDDLE AGED; PUBLIC OPINION; PUBLIC RELATIONS; SOCIAL CLASS;

UNITED STATES;

ADULT; AGED; COMMUNITY-INSTITUTIONAL RELATIONS; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; DATA COLLECTION; DEMOGRAPHY; ECOSYSTEM; FEMALE; FINANCIAL SUPPORT; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEW YORK; PUBLIC OPINION; SOCIAL CLASS;

EID: 0036527111     PISSN: 0364152X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00267-001-0033-Z     Document Type: Review

References (36)

1. Ajzen, I. 1989. Attitude structure and behavior. Pages 241-274 in A. R. Pratkanis, S.J. Breckler, and A. G. Greenwald (eds.) Attitude structure and function. Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc., Hillsdale, NJ
2. Ajzen, I., and M. Fishbein. 1980. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 278 pp.
3. Barro, S. C., and A. D. Bright. 1998. Public views on ecological restoration. Restoration and Management Notes 16(1):59-65
4. Bjornstad, D. J., and J. R. Kahn (eds). 1996. The contingent valuation of environmental resources: methodological issues and research needs. Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc., Brookfield, VT, 305 pp.
5. Brown, T. L., D.J. Decker, and N. A. Connelly. 1989. Response to mail surveys on resource-based recreation topics: a behavioral model and an empirical analysis. Leisure Sciences 11:99-110
6. Carson, R. T., W. J. Hanneman, R. J. Kopp, J. A. Krosnick, R. C. Mitchell, S. Presser, P. A. Ruud, and V. K. Smith. 1996. Was the NOAA Panel correct about contingent valuation? Working Paper 96-29. Resources for the Future, Washington
7. Champ, P. A. 1994. Nonmarket valuation of natural resource amenities: a validity test of the contingent valuation method. PhD. Dissertation. University of Wisconsin, Madison
8. Connelly, N. A., and T. L. Brown. 1994. Effect of social desirability bias and memory recall on reported contributions to a wildlife income tax checkoff program. Leisure Sciences 16:81-91
9. Dillman, D. A. 1978. Mail and telephone surveys: the total design method. Wiley-Interscience, New York, 325 pp.
10. Dunlap, R. E. 1992. Trends in public opinion toward environmental issues: 1965-1990. Pages 89-116 in R. E. Dunlap and A. G. Mertig (eds.) American environmentalism: The U.S. environmental movement. Taylor and Francis, Washington
11. Dunlap, R. E., G. H. Gallup, Jr., and A. M. Gallup. 1993. Health of the planet: results of a 1992 international environmental opinion survey of citizens in 24 nations. The George H. Gallup International Institute, Princeton, 155 PP.
12. Dunlap, R. E., and K. D. Van Liere. 1978. The "New Environmental Paradigm": a proposed measuring instrument and preliminary results. Journal of Environmental Education 9:10-19
13. Endter-Wada, J., D. Blahna, R. Krannich, and M. Brunson. 1998. A framework for understanding social science contributions to ecosystem management. Ecological Applications 8:891-904
14. Haney, A., and R. L. Power. 1996. Adaptive management for sound ecosystem management. Environmental Management 20:879-886
15. Hudson River Estuary Program. 1999. 1998 Hudson River Estuary action plan. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, New Paltz, 130 pp.
16. Jones, R. E., J. M. Fly, and H. K. Cordell. 1999. How green is my valley? Tracking rural and urban environmentalism in the Southern Appalachian ecoregion. Rural Sociology 64: 482-499
17. Kauffman, M. R., R. T. Graham, D. A. Boyce, Jr., W. H. Moir, L. Perry, R. T. Reynolds, R. L. Bassett, P. Mehlhop, C. B. Edminster, W. Block, and P. S. Corn. 1994. An ecological basis for ecosystem management. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report RM-246. USDA Forest Service, Fort Collins, CO
18. Kay, D. 1998. Long Islanders and the environment of the South Shore: a survey of public opinion. Cornell Local Government Program, Ithaca, 127 pp.
19. Kelly, T., and R. Sushak. 1996. Using surveys as input to comprehensive watershed management: a case study from Minnesota. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report NC-181. USDA Forest Service, St. Paul, 31 pp.
20. Kempton, W.,J. S. Boster, and J. A. Hartley. 1995. Environmental values in American culture. MIT Press, Cambridge, 320 pp.
21. Kent, R. 1999. Restoring coastal ecosystems. Coastlines 27(2):1, 4-7
22. Lee, K. N. 1995. Deliberately seeking sustainability in the Columbia River Basin. Pages 214-238 in L. H. Gunderson, C. S. Holling, and S. S. Light (eds,) Barriers and bridges to the renewal of ecosystems and institutions. Columbia University Press, New York
23. Milon, J. W., C. M. Adams, and D. W. Carter. 1998. Floridians' attitudes about the environment and coastal marine resources. Florida Sea Grant College Program, Gainesville, 50 PP.
24. Mitchell, R. C., and R. T. Carson. 1989. Using surveys to value public goods: the contingent valuation method. Resources for the Future, Washington, 463 pp.
25. National Research Council. 1992. Restoration of aquatic ecosystems: science, technology, and public policy. National Academy Press, Washington, 552 pp.
26. Proctor, J. D. 1998. Environmental values and popular conflict over environmental management: a comparative analysis of public comments on the Clinton forest plan. Environmental Management 22:347-358
27. Scott, D., and F. K. Willits. 1994. Environmental attitudes and behavior: a Pennsylvania survey. Environment and Behavior 26:239-260
28. Solecki, W. D. 1998. Local attitudes on regional ecosystem management: a study of New Jersey Pinelands residents. Society and Natural Resources 11:441-463
29. Smith, C. L., J. D. Gilden, J. S. Cone, and B. S. Steel. 1997. Contrasting views of coastal residents and coastal coho restoration planners. Fisheries 22(12):8-15
30. SPSS Inc. 1994. SPSS 6.1 syntax reference guide. SPSS Inc., Chicago, 941 pp.
31. StataCorp. 1999. Stata statistical software: release 6.0. Stata Corporation, College Station, TX, 194 pp.
32. Steel, B. S., P. List, and B. Shindler. 1994. Conflicting values about federal forests: a comparison of national and Oregon publics. Society and Natural Resources 7:137-153
33. Steel, B. S., D. L. Soden, and R. L. Warner. 1990. The impact of knowledge and values on perceptions of environmental risk to the Great Lakes. Society and Natural Resources 3:331-348
34. Stern, P. C., T. Dietz, and L. Kalof. 1993. Value orientations, gender, and environmental concern. Environment and Behavior 25:322-348
35. Theodori, G. L., A. E. Luloff, and F. K. Willits. 1998. The association of outdoor recreation and environmental behaviors. Pages 99-103 in H. G. Vogelsong (ed.) Proc. 1998 Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report NE-255. USDA Forest Service, Radnor, PA
36. Whitehead, J. C., and T. J. Hoban. 1999. Testing for temporal reliability in contingent valuation with time changes in factors affecting demand. Land Economics 75:453-465