Comparison of three instrumentation techniques in the preparation of simulated curved root canals

International Endodontic Journal

Volumn 29, Issue 5, 1996, Pages 315-319

  Zmener, O ^a   Banegas, G ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE BUENOS AIRES   (Argentina)

Author keywords

Endodontics; Instrumentation techniques; Root canal instrumentation; Shaping

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL EQUIPMENT; ENDODONTICS; EVALUATION; HISTOLOGY; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; TOOTH PULP; TORQUE; ULTRASOUND;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DENTAL INSTRUMENTS; DENTAL PULP CAVITY; EVALUATION STUDIES; ROOT CANAL PREPARATION; SONICATION; TORQUE;

EID: 0030224896     PISSN: 01432885     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.1996.tb01391.x     Document Type: Review

References (19)

1. ABOU-RASS M, FRANK AL, GLICK DH (1980) The anticurvature filing method to prepare the curved root canal. Journal of the American Dental Association 101, 792-4.
2. BRISEÑO BM, SONNABEND E (1991) The influence of different root canal instruments on root canal preparation: an in vitro study. International Endodontic Journal 24, 15-23.
3. CHENAIL BL, TEPLITSKY PE (1985) Endosonics in curved root canals. Journal of Endodontics 11, 369-74.
4. GREENE KJ, KRELL KV (1990) Clinical factors associated with ledged canals in maxillary and mandibular molars. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine and Oral Pathology 70, 490-7.
5. GUTIERREZ JH, GARCÍA J (1968) Microscopic and macroscopic investigation on results of mechanical preparation of root canals. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine and Oral Pathology 25, 108-16.
6. MULLANEY TP, PETRICH JD (1968) The ledged root canal: Cause, prevention and correction. Journal of the Kentucky Dental Association 20, 15-8.
7. MULLANEY TP (1979) Instrumentation of finely curved canals. Dental Clinics of North America 23, 575-92.
8. MCCANN JT, KELLER DL, LABOUNTY GL (1990) Remaining dentin/cement thickness after hand or ultrasonic instrumentation. Journal of Endodontics 16, 109-13.
9. O'CONNELL DT, BRAYTON SM (1975) Evaluation of root canal preparation with two automated endodontic handpieces. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine and Oral Pathology 39, 298-303.
10. PEDICORD D, EL DEEB ME, MESSER HH (1986) Hand versus ultrasonic instrumentation: Its effects on canal shape and instrumentation time. Journal of Endodontics 12, 375-81.
11. SCHILDER H (1974) Cleaning and shaping the root canal. Dental Clinics of North America 18, 269-96.
12. TRONSTAD L, BARNETT F, SCHWARTZBEN L, FRASCA P (1985) Effectiveness and safety of a sonic vibratory endodontic instrument. Endodontics and Dental Traumatology 1, 69-76.
13. WALIA H, BRANTLEY WA, GERSTEIN H (1988) An initial investigtion of the bending and torsional properties of Nitinol root canal files. Journal of Endodontics 14, 346-51.
14. WALKER TL, DEL RÍO CE (1989) Histologic evaluation of ultrasonic and sonic instrumentation of curved root canals. Journal of Endodontics 15, 49-59.
15. WEINE FS, KELLY RF, BRAY KE (1976) Effect of preparation with endodontic handpieces on original canal shape. Journal of Endodontics 2, 298-301.
16. WEINE FS, KELLY RF, LÍO PJ (1975) The effect of preparation procedures on original canal shape and on apical foramen shape. Journal of Endodontics 1, 255-62.
17. ZMENER O, BALBACHAN L (1995) Effectiveness of nickel-titanium files for preparing curved root canals. Endodontics and Dental Traumatology 11, 121-3.
18. ZMENER O, MARRERO G (1992) Effectiveness of different endodontic files for preparing curved root canals: A scanning electron microscopic study. Endodontics and Dental Traumatology 8, 99-103.
19. ZMENER O, SPIELBERG C, OLMOS J (1994) Effectiveness of two different methods for preparing curved root canals. Endodontics and Dental Traumatology 10, 215-9.