Roentgenographic investigation of frequency and degree of canal curvatures in human permanent teeth

Journal of Endodontics

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 211-216

  Schäfer, Edgar ^a   Diez, Christian ^a   Hoppe, Wolfgang ^b   Tepel, Joachim ^b  

^a Poliklinik für Zahnerhaltung A   (Germany)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DENTITION; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; ODONTOMETRY; RADIOGRAPHY; STATISTICS; TOOTH PULP; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY; TOOTH ROOT;

DENTAL PULP CAVITY; DENTITION, PERMANENT; HUMANS; ODONTOMETRY; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL, DIGITAL; TOOTH ROOT;

EID: 0036513661     PISSN: 00992399     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00004770-200203000-00017     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Cunningham CJ, Senia ES. A three-dimensional study of canal curvatures in the mesial roots of mandibular molars. J Endodon 1992;18:294-300.
2. Gullickson DC, Montgomery S. The study of root canal morphology using a digital image processing technique. J Endodon 1987;13:158-63.
3. Mayo CV, Montgomery S, del Rio C. A computerized method for evaluating root canal morphology. J Endodon 1986;12:2-7.
4. Hess W, Zurcher E. The anatomy of the root canals of the teeth of the permanent and deciduous dentitions. London: John Bale, Sons and Danielson Ltd., 1925.
5. Fisher DE, Ingersoll N, Bucher JF. Anatomy of the pulpal canal: threedimensional visualization. J Endodon 1975;1:22-5.
6. Pineda F, Kuttler Y. Mesiodistal and buccolingual roentgenographic investigation of 7,275 root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1972;33: 101-10.
7. Kerekes K, Tronstad L. Morphometric observations on root canals of human premolars. J Endodon 1977;3:74-9.
8. Vertucci FJ. Root canal anatomy of human permanent teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1984;58:589-99. (Pubitemid 15212711)
9. Lim SS, Stock CJR. The risk of perforation in the curved canal: anticurvature filing compared with the stepback technique. Int Endod J 1987;20: 33-9.
10. Schneider SW. A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1971;32:271-5.
11. Pruett JP, Clement DJ, Carnes DL. Cyclic fatigue of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. J Endodon 1997;23:77-85.
12. Thompson SA, Dummer PMH. Shaping ability of Quantec Series 2000 rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals: Parts 1 and 2. Int Endod J 1998;31:259-74.
13. Dummer PMH, Al-Omari MAO, Bryant S. Comparison of the performance of four files with rounded tips during shaping of simulated root canals. J Endodon 1998;24:364-71. (Pubitemid 128704162)
14. Haikel Y, Serfaty R, Bateman G, Senger B, Allemann C. Dynamic and cyclic fatigue of engine-driven rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. J Endodon 1999;25:434-40.
15. Roane JB, Sabala CL, Duncanson MG. The balanced force concept for instrumentation of curved canals. J Endodon 1985;11:203-11.
16. Weine FS, Pasiewicz RA, Rice RT. Canal configuration of the mandibular second molar using a clinically oriented in vitro method. J Endodon 1988;14:207-13.
17. Jardine SJ, Gulabivala K. An in vitro comparison of canal preparation using two automated rotary nickel-titanium instrumentation techniques. Int Endod J 2000;33:381-91.