The effect of resource quality information on resource injury perceptions and contingent values

Resource and Energy Economics

Volumn 24, Issue 1-2, 2002, Pages 13-31

  Hoehn, John P ^a   Randall, Alan ^b  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bayesian updating; Contingent valuation; Information; NRDA; Questionnaire design

Indexed keywords

ALGEBRA; MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS; REDUNDANCY; TOXICITY; VALUE ENGINEERING;

RESOURCE INJURY PERCEPTIONS; RESOURCE QUALITY INFORMATION;

ENERGY RESOURCES;

CONTINGENT VALUATION; PERCEPTION; QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

EID: 0036474897     PISSN: 09287655     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0928-7655(01)00051-3     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Information effects in contingent markets
2. The impact of information on environmental commodity valuation decisions
3. Cognitive considerations in presenting risk information. Chapter 2
4. Resource quality information and validity of willingness to pay in contingent valuation
5. Commodity specification and the framing of contingent-valuation questions
6. Species substitution and question sequencing in contingent valuation surveys evaluating the hunting of several types of wildlife
7. Efficient estimation methods for 'closed-ended' contingent valuation surveys
8. Was the NOAA panel correct about contingent valuation? Discussion paper
9. Issues in questionnaire design
10. Welfare analysis with discrete choice models
11. Valuing injury to natural resources
12. Valuing the multidimensional impacts of environmental policy: Theory and methods
13. Too many proposals pass the benefit cost test
14. Contingent valuation focus groups: Insights from ethnographic interview techniques
15. Valuing public goods: The purchase of moral satisfaction
16. Do focus groups and personal interviews reveal the same information for natural resource valuation?
17. Constructing measures of economic value. Working paper
18. Split sample tests for scope effects in contingent valuation estimates of environmental health risk information
19. Do reminders of substitutes and budget constraints influence contingent valuation estimates?
20. Economic benefits of critical habitat for the Mexican spotted owl: A scope test using a multiple-bounded contingent valuation
21. Consumer processing of hazard warning information
22. Using surveys to value public goods: The contingent valuation method
23. Valuation of groundwater quality using a contingent valuation damage function approach
24. Embedding in market demand systems
25. Subjective versus technical risk estimates: Do risk communication policies increase consistency?
26. Risk communication and the value of information: Radon as a case study
27. Can public information programs affect risk perceptions?
28. Do risk information programs promote mitigating behavior?
29. How do risk perceptions respond to information? The case of radon
30. The effects of information on willingness-to-pay values of endangered species
31. Prospective reference theory: Toward an explanation of the paradoxes
32. Adaptive responses to chemical labeling: Are workers Bayesian decision makers?
33. Measuring contingent values for wetlands: Effects of information about related environmental goods
34. Do reminders of substitutes and budget constraints influence contingent valuation estimates?