A decade of the Americans with disabilities act: Judicial outcomes and unresolved problems

Industrial Relations

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 11-30

  Lee, Barbara A ^a  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DISABILITY; EMPLOYMENT; LABOR POLICY; LEGAL SYSTEM;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 0036461626     PISSN: 00198676     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1468-232X.00274     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Acemoglu, Daron, and Joshua Angrist, 2001, "Consequences of Employment Protection? The Case of the Americans With Disabilities Act." Journal of Political Economy 109:915.
2. Adamczyk v. Chief of Police 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 1331 (4th Cir. 1998).
3. Albertsons, Inc. v. Kirkingburg, 119 S. Ct. 2162 (1999).
4. Barnett v. U.S. Air Inc., 228 F.3d 1105 (9th Cir. 2000)(en banc), vacated and remanded sub nom U.S. Airways v. Barnett, 122 S. Ct. 1516 (2002).
5. Berkowitz, E. D. 1987. Disabled Policy: America's Programs for the Handicapped. New York: Cambridge University Press.
6. Blanck, Peter D. 1994. Communicating the Americans with Disabilities Act. Transcending Compliance: A Case Report on Sears. Roebuck and Co. Washington: The Annenberg Washington Program in Communications Policy Studies of Northwestern University.
7. Blanck, Peter D. 1996. The Americans with Disabilities Act, Transcending Compliance: 1996 Follow-Up Report. Washington: The Annenberg Washington Program in Communications Policy Studies of Northwestern University.
8. Bragdon v. Abbott, 524 U.S. 624 (1998).
9. Bridges v. City of Bossier, 92 F.3d 329 (5th Cir. 1996).
10. Burgdorf, Robert L., Jr. 1997. "'Substantially Limited' Protection from Disability Discrimination: The Special Treatment Model and Misconstructions of the Definition of Disability." Villanova Law Review 42(2):409-585.
11. Cannizaro v. Neiman Marcus, 979 F. Supp. 465 (N.D. Tex. 1997).
12. Chandler v. City of Dallas, 2 F. 3d 1385 (5th Cir. 1993).
13. Chirikos, T. N. 1991. "The Economics of Employment." In The Americans with Disabilities Act: From Policy to Practice, edited by Jane West, pp. 150-79. New York: Milbank Memorial Fund.
14. Clermont, K. M. and T. Eisenberg. In press. "Plaintiphobia in the Appellate Courts: Civil Rights Really Do Differ from Negotiable Instruments." University of Illinois Law Review.
15. Cleveland v. Policy Management Systems, 119 S. Ct. 1597 (1999).
16. Cohn, L. M. 2000. "When Is Individual Regarded as Having, or Perceived to Have, Impairment within Meaning of Americans with Disabilities Act?" 148 A.L.R. Fed. 305.
17. Colella, Adrienne, 1994. "Organizational Socialization of Employees with Disabilities: A Framework for Future Research." In Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, vol. 14, edited by G. R. Ferris, pp. 351-417. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
18. Colker, Ruth. 1999. "The Americans with Disabilities Act: A Windfall for Defendants." Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review 34:99-162.
19. Collignon, F. C. 1986. "The Role of Reasonable Accomodation in Employing Disabled Persons in Private Industry." In Disability and the Labor Market, edited by M. Berkowitz and M. A. Hill, pp. 196-241. Ithaca, NY: Industrial and Labor Relations Press.
20. Comer, R., and J. Piliavin, 1975. "As Others See Us: Attitudes of Physically Handicapped and Normals Toward Own and Other Groups." Rehabilitation Literature 36:206-21.
21. D'Agostino, T. 1997. Defining "Disability" Under the ADA: Revised and Expanded 1997 Edition. Horsham, PA: Labor Relations Press.
22. Deane v. Pocono Medical Center, 142 F.3d 138 (ed Cir. 1998).
23. DeLeire, T. 2000. "The Wage and Employment Effects of the Americans with Disabilities Act." Journal of Human Resources 35(4):693-715.
24. Dudley, A. 1999. "Rights to Reasonable Accomodation Under the Americans with Disabilities Act for 'Regarded as' Disabled Individuals." George Mason Law Review 7:389-417.
25. Duff v. Lobdel-Emery Manufacturing Co., 926 F. Supp. 799 (N.D. Ind. 1996).
26. Duncan v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, 240 F.3d 1110 (D.C. Cir. 2001).
27. Epstein, R. A. 1992. Forbidden Grounds: The Case Against Employment Discrimination Laws. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. 2002. "Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) Charges, FY 1992-FY 2001"; available at www.eeoc.gov.
29. Florian, V. 1978. "Employers' Opinions of the Disabled Person as a Worker." Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin 22(1):38-43.
30. Gaul v. Lucent Technologies, 134 F.3d 576 (3d Cir. 1998).
31. Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama v. Garrett, 121 S. Ct. 955 (2001).
32. Haveman, R. H. and B. L. Wolfe, 1989. "The Economic Well-Being of the Disabled." Journal of Human Resources 25(1):32-54.
33. Hilburn v. Murata Electronics North America, 181 F.3d 1220 (11th Cir. 1999).
34. Holmes, S. A. 1994. "In 4 Years, Disabilities Act Hasn't Improved Jobs Rate." New York Times, October 23, p. A-18.
35. Ivy v. Jones 192 F.3d 514 (5th Cir. 1999).
36. Janofsky, J. C. 1993, "Whoever Wrote ADA Regs Never Ran a Business." Wall Street Journal, March 15, p. A-12.
37. Johnson, R., and L. Heal. 1976. "Private Employment Agency Responses to the Physically Handicapped Applicant in a Wheelchair." Journal of Rehabilitation Counseling 7:12-21.
38. Janofsky, J. C. 1993. "Whoever Wrote ADA Regs Never Ran a Business." Wall Street Journal, March 15, p. A-12.
39. Jones, E. E., A. Farina, A. H. Hastorf, H. Markus, D. T. Miller, and R. A. Scott. 1984. Social Stigma: The Psychology of Marked Relationships. New York: Freeman.
40. Kirchner, C. 1996. "Looking Under the Street Lamp: Inappropriate Uses of Measures Just Because They Are There." Journal of Disability Policy Studies 7(1):77-90.
41. Kralick v. Durbin, 130 F.3d 76 (3d Cir. 1997).
42. Kruse, Douglas, and Lisa Schur. 2002. "Employment of People with Disabilities Following the ADA." Industrial Relations (this issue).
43. Lanctot, C. J. 1997. "Ad Hoc Decision Making and Per Se Prejudice: How Individualizing the Determination of 'Disability' Undermines the ADA." Villanova Law Review 42(2):327-44.
44. LaPlante, Mitchell P. 1991. "The Demographics of Disability." In The Americans with Disabilities Act: From Policy to Practice, edited by Jane West, pp. 55-77. Washington: Milbank Memorial Fund.
45. Lee, Barbara A. 1992. "Reasonable Accomodation and the Unionized Employer: Reassignment of Workers with Disabilities." Human Resource Management Review 2:183-93.
46. Lee, Barbara A. 2001. "The Implications of ADA Litigation for Employers: A Review of Federal Appellate Court Decisions." Human Resource Management 40(1):35-50.
47. Lee, Barbara A. and Karen A. Newman. 1995. "Employer Responses to Disability: Preliminary Evidence and a Research Agenda." Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal 8:209-29.
48. Livingston, S. 1991. "New Rights Law Is Expected to Bring More Disabled into the Workplace." Newark Star Ledger, October 4, p. 40.
49. Locke, S. S. 1997. "The Incredible Shrinking Protected Class: Redefining the Scope of Disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act." University of Colorado Law Review 68:107-46.
50. Makas, Elaine 1988. "Positive Attitudes Toward Disabled People: Disabled and Nondisabled Persons' Perspectives." Journal of Social Issues 44(1):49-61.
51. Mayerson, Arlene B. 1997. "Restoring Regard for the 'Regarded as' Prong: Giving Effect to Congressional Intent." Villanova Law Review 42:587-612.
52. Moberly, M. D. 1996. "Perception or Reality?: Some Reflections on the Interpretation of Disability Discrimination Statues." Hofstra Labor Law Journal 13:345-79.
53. Murphy v. United Parcel Service, Inc., 119 S. Ct. 2133 (1999).
54. National Council on Disability. 1986. Toward Independence. Washington: Author.
55. National Council on Disability. 1988. On the Threshold of Independence. Washington: Author.
56. National Disability Law Reporter. 1997, November 20. "Most Federal Appeals Court Decisions Favor ADA Defendants, Analysis Shows." National Disability Law Reporter 10(10):1, 8-9.
57. Oi, W. 1991. "Disability and a Workfare-Welfare Dilemma." In Disability and Work: Incentives, Rights, and Opportunities, edited by C. L. Weaver, pp. 31-45. Washington: AEI Press.
58. Parry, J. 1998. "Study Finds Employers Win Most ADA Title I Judicial and Administrative Complaints." Daily Labor Report (BNA) 119:E-1-E-3.
59. Parry, J. 2000. "1999 Employment Decisions Under the ADA Title I-Survey Update." Mental and Physical Disability Law Report 24(3):348-50.
60. Redlich v. Albany Law School, 899 F. Supp. 100 (N.D.N.Y. 1995).
61. Rosen, S. 1991. "Disability Accommodation and the Labor Market." In Disability and Work: Incentives, Rights, and Opportunities, edited by C. L. Weaver, pp. 18-30. Washington: AEI Press.
62. School Board of Nassau County v. Arline, 480 U.S. 273 (1987).
63. Schwochau, Susan and Peter D. Blanck. 2000. "The Economics of the Americans with Disabilities Act, Part III: Does the ADA Disable the Disabled?" Berkeley Journal of Employment and Labor Law 21(1):271-313.
64. Schur, Lisa. 1998-1999. "Do Seniority Rights 'Trump' the ADA? Conflicts Between Collective Bargaining Agreements and the Duty to Accommodate Disabled Workers. Journal of Individual Employment Rights 7(2):167-86.
65. Schur, Lisa. 1999. "But Is It Still a Disability?" Labor Law Journal 50(2):146-55.
66. Simmons, T. 2000. "Working with the ADA's 'Regarded as' Definition of a Disability." Texas Forum on Civil Liberties and Civil Rights 5:27-79.
67. Smolowe, J. 1995. "Noble Aims, Mixed Results." Time, July 31, pp. 54-55.
68. Society for Human Resource Management. 2000. The ADA at Work: Implementation of the Employment Provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Washington: Author.
69. Sutton v. United Air Lines Inc., 119 S. Ct. 2139 (1999).
70. Tyndall v. National Education Centers, Inc., 31 F.3d 209 (4th Cir. 1994).
71. U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. 1983. Accommodating the Spectrum of Individual Abilities. Washington: Author.
72. U.S. Senate. 1989. Report No. 116, 101st Congress, 2d Session.
73. VanDetta, J. A., and D. R. Gallipeau. 2000. "Judges and Juries: Why Are So Many ADA Plaintiffs Losing Summary Judgment Motions, and Would They Fare Better Before a Jury?" The Review of Litigation 19:505-77.
74. Vande Zande v. State of Wisconsin Department of Administration, 44 F.3d 538 (7th Cir. 1995).
75. Vassel, R. A. 1994. "The Americans with Disabilities Act: The Cost, Uncertainty, and Inefficiency." Journal of Law and Commerce 13:397-411.
76. Weaver, C. L. 1991. "Incentives versus Controls in Federal Disability Policy." In Disability and Work: Incentives, Rights, and Opportunities, edited by C. L. Weaver, pp. 3-17. Washington: AEI Press.
77. Webb v. Garelick Mfg. Co., 94 F.3d 484 (8th Cir. 1996).
78. Welsh v. City of Tulsa, 977 F.2d 1415 (10th Cir. 1992).
79. West, J. 1991. "The Social and Policy Context of the Act." In The Americans with Disabilities Act: From Policy to Practice, edited by Jane West, pp. 3-24. New York: Milbank Memorial Fund.
80. Williams v. Toyota Motor Mfg., Ky., Inc., 224 F.3d 840 (6th Cir. 2000), reversed sub nom Toyota Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. Williams, 122 S. Ct. 681 (2002).