On the accuracy, repeatability, and degree of influence of kinematics parameters for industrial robots

International Journal of Modelling and Simulation

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 245-254

  Shiakolas, P S ^a   Conrad, K L ^a   Yih, T C ^a  

^a The University of Texas at Arlington   (United States)

Author keywords

Accuracy; Degree of influence; Repeatability; Robotic error

Indexed keywords

ERROR ANALYSIS; KINEMATICS; MANIPULATORS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; TREES (MATHEMATICS);

ROBOTIC ERRORS;

INDUSTRIAL ROBOTS;

EID: 0036455337     PISSN: 02286203     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02286203.2002.11442246     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. J.J. Craig, Introduction to robotics: Mechanics and control, 2nd ed. (Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley, 1989).
2. B. Greenway, On the money: The importance of robot accuracy is increasing as applications become more sophisticated, Robotics World, September/October 1998.
3. J. Owens, Robot calibration-questions and answers (Robot Simulations Limited, 1998).
4. J.F. Quínet, Calibration for offline programming purpose and its expectations, Industrial Robot: An International Journal, 22(3), 1995, 9-14.
5. ISO/TR 13309. Manipulating industrial robots-informative guide on test equipment and metrology methods of operation for robot performance evaluation in accordance with ISO 9283, 1995.
6. B. Shirinzadeh, Laser interferometry-based tracking for dynamic measurements, Industrial Robot: An International Journal, 25(1), 1998, 35-41.
7. H. Janocha & D. Bernd, ICAROS: Over-all-calibration of industrial robots, Industrial Robot: An International Journal, 22(3), 1995, 15-20.
8. F. Hidalgo & P. Brunn, Robot metrology and calibration systems-a market review, Industrial Robot: An International Journal, 25 (1), 1998, 42-47.
9. M.S. Woodward, Automation gets smart and agile, Assembly, June 1999.
10. 1998 Robotics Industry Trends Report, Robotics International, Society of Manufacturing Engineers, 1998.
11. Z.S. Roth, B.W. Mooring, B., Ravani, An overview of robot calibration, IEEE Journal of Robotics and Automation, RA-3(5), 1987, 377-385.
12. P.S. Rocadas & R.S. McMaster, A robot cell calibration algorithm and its use with a 3D measuring system, Proc. of the IEEE International Symp. on Industrial Electronics, 1, 1997, SS297-SS302.
13. M. Vincze, H. Gander, & J.P. Prenninger, A model of tumbling to improve robot accuracy, Mechanism and Machine Theory, 30(6), 1995, 849-859.
14. M. Driels & W.E. Swayze, Automated partial pose measurement system for manipulator calibration experiments, IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 10(4), 1994, 430-440.
15. T. Lu & G.C.J. Lin, An on-line relative position and orientation error celibration methodology for workcell robot operations, Robotics and Computer Integrated Manufacturing 13(2), 1997, 89-99.
16. C. Gong, J. Yuan, & J. Ni, Non-geometric error identification and compensation for robotic system by inverse calibration, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 40, 2000, 2119. 2137.
17. ISO 9283, Manipulating industrial robots-performance criteria and related test methods, International Standards Organization, 1998.
18. R.X. Robots, Stäubli Corporation, 1998.
19. R.P. Paul, Robot manipulators-mathematics, programming, and control, 7th Printing (Cambridge, Massachusettes: MIT Press, 1986).
20. P.I, Corke & B. Armstrong-Helouvry, A search for consensus among model parameters reported for the PUMA 560 Robot, IEEE Conf. on Robotics and Automation, San Diego, May 1994, 1608-1613.