The banking industry after the Riegle-Neal Act: Re-structure and overall performance

Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance

Volumn 42, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 901-909

  Nippani, Srinivas ^a   Green Jr , Kenneth W ^b  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY COMMERCE   (United States)

^b HENDERSON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bank consolidation; Banking industry performance; Riegle Neal

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036448961     PISSN: 10629769     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1062-9769(01)00106-5     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Brook, Y., Hendershott, R., & Lee, D. (1998). The gains from takeover deregulation: Evidence from the end of interstate banking restrictions. The Journal of Finance, 53(6), 2185-2204.
2. Calomiris, C. W. (1999). Gauging the efficiency of bank consolidation during a merger wave. Journal of Banking and Finance, 23(2), 615-621.
3. Carrow, K. A., & Heron, R. A. (1998). The interstate banking and branching efficiency act of 1994: A wealth event for acquisition targets. Journal of Banking and Finance, 22, 175-196.
4. Hunter, W., Timme, S., & Yang, W. (1990). An examination of cost subadditivity and multiproduct production in large U.S. banks. Journal of Money, Credit and banking, 22, 504-525.
5. Jayaratne, J., & Strahan, P. E. (1997). The benefits of branching deregulation. Economic Policy Review-Federal Reserve bank of New York, 3(4), 13-29.
6. Lehner, J. C. (1999). Bank performance affected by changing interest rates. Texas Banking, 88(8), 18-19.