The unseen power loss: Stemming the flow

Educational and Psychological Measurement

Volumn 62, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 960-968

  Gillett, Raphael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036444103     PISSN: 00131644     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0013164402238084     Document Type: Review

References (19)

1. Adcock, C. J. (1988). A Bayesian approach to calculating sample sizes. The Statistician, 37, 433-439.
2. Brown, B. W., Herson, J., Atkinson, J. N., & Rozell, M. E. (1987). Projection from previous studies: A Bayesian and frequentist compromise. Controlled Clinical Trials, 8, 29-44.
3. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Academic Press.
4. DasGupta, A., & Vidakovic, B. (1997). Sample size problems in ANOVA Bayesian point of view. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 65, 335-347.
5. Gillett, R. (1986). Sample size determination in replication attempts: The standard normal z test. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 39, 190-207.
6. Gillett, R. (1995). The expected power of F and t tests conditional on information from an earlier study. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 48, 371-384.
7. Gillett, R. (1996). Sample size determination in a chi-squared test given information from a previous study. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 21, 230-246.
8. Gillett, R. (2001). Sample size determination for a t test given a t value from a previous study: A FORTRAN 77 program. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 33, 544-548.
9. Haase, R. F., Waechter, D. M., & Solomon, G. S. (1982). How significant is a significant difference? Average effect size of research in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 29, 58-65.
10. Hedges, L. V. (1984). Estimation of effect size under nonrandom sampling: The effect of censoring studies yielding insignificant mean differences. Journal of Educational Statistics, 9, 61-85.
11. Joseph, L., & Wolfson, D. B. (1997). Interval-based versus decision theoretic criteria for the choice of sample size. The Statistician, 46, 145-149.
12. Kazdin, A. E., & Bass, D. (1989). Power to detect differences between alternative treatments in comparative psychotherapy outcomes. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 138-147.
13. Kraemer, H. C., & Thiemann, S. (1987). How many subjects? Statistical power analysis in research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
14. Lane, D. M., & Dunlap, W. P. (1978). Estimating effect size: Bias resulting from the significance criterion in editorial decisions. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 31, 107-112.
15. Murphy, K. R., & Myors, B. (1998). Statistical power analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16. Overall, J. (1969). Classical statistical hypothesis testing within the context of Bayesian theory. Psychological Bulletin, 71, 285-292.
17. Smith, M. L. (1980). Publication bias and meta-analysis. Evaluation in Education, 4, 22-24.
18. Spiegelhalter, D. J., & Freedman, L. S. (1986). A predictive approach to selecting the size of a clinical trial, based on subjective clinical opinion. Statistics in Medicine, 5, 1-13.
19. Stallard, N. (1998). Sample size determination for phase II clinical trials based on Bayesian decision theory. Biometrics, 54, 279-294.