Sample size determination for a t test given a t value from a previous study: A FORTRAN 77 program

Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers

Volumn 33, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 544-548

  Gillett, Raphael ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER LANGUAGE; HUMAN; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SAMPLE SIZE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; HUMANS; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SAMPLE SIZE;

EID: 0035524358     PISSN: 07433808     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03195414     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. COHEN, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Academic Press.
2. GATSONIS, C., & SAMPSON, A. R. (1989). Multiple correlation: Exact power and sample size calculations. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 516-524.
3. GILLETT, R. (1986). Sample size determination in replication attempts: The standard normal z test. British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology, 39, 190-207.
4. GILLETT, R. (1991). A FORTRAN 77 program for sample-size determination in replication attempts when effect size is uncertain. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 23, 442-446.
5. GILLETT, R. (1994). An average power criterion for sample size estimation. The Statistician, 43, 389-394.
6. GILLETT, R. (1995). The expected power of F and t tests conditional on information from an earlier study. British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology, 48, 371-384.
7. HAASE, R. F., WAECHTER, D. M., & SOLOMON, G. S. (1982). How significant is a significant difference? Average effect size of research in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 29, 58-65.
8. HEDGES, L. V. (1984). Estimation of effect size under nonrandom sampling: The effect of censoring studies yielding insignificant mean differences. Journal of Educational Statistics, 9, 61-85.
9. KRAEMER, H. C., & THIEMANN, S. (1987). How Many Subjects? Statistical Power Analysis in Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
10. LANE, D. M., & DUNLAP, W. P. (1978). Estimating effect size: Bias resulting from the significance criterion in editorial decisions. British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology, 31, 107-112.
11. MURPHY, K. R., & MYORS, B. (1998). Statistical power analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. PRESS, W. H., TEUKOLSKY, S. A., VETTERLING, W. T., & FLANNERY, B. P. (1992). Numerical recipes in FORTRAN: The art of scientific computing (2nd ed). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. STATLIB APPLIED STATISTICS ALGORITHMS (1999) [On-line]. Available: http://lib.stat.cmu.edu/apstat.
14. WAHLSTEN, D. (1991). Sample size to detect a planned contrast and a one degree-of-freedom interaction effect. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 587-595.