Working within organizational cycles - A more suitable way to manage action research projects in large organizations?

Systemic Practice and Action Research

Volumn 15, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 465-484

  Molineux, John ^a,b   Haslett, Tim ^b  

^a Australian Public Service   (Australia)

^b MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Action research; Action research cycles; Causal loop diagramming; Organizational cycles; Punctuated equilibrium; Systems thinking

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036432371     PISSN: 1094429X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1021060603452     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Amburgey, T. L., Kelly, D., and Barnett, W. P. (1993). Resetting the clock: The dynamics of organizational change and failure. Admin. Sci. Q. 38, 51-73.
2. Ancona, D. G., Goodman, P. S., Lawrence, B. S., and Tushman, M. L. (2001a). Time: A new research lens. Acad. Manage. Rev. 26(4), 645-663.
3. Ancona, D. G., Okhuysen, G. A., and Perlow, L. A. (2001b). Taking time to integrate temporal research. Acad. Manage. Rev. 26(4), 512-529.
4. Anderson, P., and Tushman, M. L. (1990). Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: A cyclical model of technological change. Admin. Sci. Q. 35, 604-633.
5. Argyris, C., and Schön, D. A. (1991). Participatory action research and action science compared: A commentary. In Whyte, W. F. (ed.), Participatory Action Research, Sage, Newbury Park, CA, pp. 85-96.
6. Brown, S. L., and Eisenhardt, K. M. (1997). The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Admin. Sci. Q. 42(1), 1-34.
7. Burns, J. R., and Musa, P. (2001). Structural validation of causal loop diagrams. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference of the Systems Dynamics Society, Atlanta, GA.
8. Checkland, P. B. (1981). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, Wiley, Chichester, England.
9. Checkland, P. B. (1985). From optimizing to learning: A development of systems thinking for the 1990s. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 36(9), 757-767.
10. Checkland, P. B., and Scholes, J. (1990). Soft Systems Methodology in Action, Wiley, Chichester, England.
11. Chisholm, R. F. (2001). Action research to develop an interorganizational network. In Reason, P. and Bradbury, H. (eds.), Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice, Sage, London, pp. 324-332.
12. Eldredge, N., and Gould, S. (1972). Punctuated equilibria: An alternative to phyletic gradualism. In Schopf, T. J. (ed.), Models in Paleobiology, Freeman, San Francisco, pp. 82-115.
13. Flood, R. L. (2001). The relationship of 'systems thinking' to action research. In Reason, P., and Bradbury, H. (eds.), Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice, Sage, London, pp. 133-144.
14. Forrester, J. W. (1961). Industrial Dynamics, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
15. Gersick, C. J. G. (1988). Time and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group development. Acad. Manage. J. 31, 9-41.
16. Gersick, C. J. G. (1991). Revolutionary change theories: A multilevel exploration of the punctuated equilibrium paradigm. Acad. Manage. Rev. 16(1), 10-36.
17. Greenwood, D. J., and Levin, M. (1998). Introduction to Action Research, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
18. Greenwood, D. J., and Levin, M. (2000). Reconstructing the relationships between universities and society through action research. In Denzin, N. K., and Lincoln, Y. S. (eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2nd edn., Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 85-106.
19. Gustavsen, B. (2001). Theory and Practice: The mediating discourse. In Reason, P., and Bradbury, H. (eds.), Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice, Sage, London, pp. 17-26.
20. Haken, H. (1981). Synergistics: Is self-organization governed by universal principles? In Jantsch, E. (ed.), Toward a Unifying Paradigm of Physical, Biological, and Sociocultural Evolution, Westview Press, Boulder, CO, pp. 15-23.
21. Hannan, M. T., and Freeman, J. (1984). Structural inertia and organizational change. Am. Sociol. Rev. 29, 149-164.
22. Haveman, H. A. (1992). Between a rock and a hard place: Organizational change and performance under conditions of fundamental environmental transformation. Admin. Sci. Q. 37, 48-75.
23. Hedberg, B., Nystrom, P., and Starbuck, W. (1976). Camping on seesaws: Prescriptions for a self-designing organization. Admin. Sci. Q. 21, 41-65.
24. Huy, Q.N. (2001). Time, temporal capability, and planned change. Acad. Manage. Rev. 26(4), 601-623.
25. Kelly, D., and Amburgey, T. L. (1991). Organizational inertia and momentum: A dynamic model of strategic change. Acad. Manage. J. 34, 591-612.
26. Kemmis, S., and McTaggart, R. (2000). Participatory action research. In Denzin, N. K., and Lincoln, Y. S. (eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2nd edn., Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 567-605.
27. Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolution, 2nd edn., University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
28. Lepak, D. P., and Snell, S. A. (1999). The human resource architecture: Toward a theory of human capital allocation and development. Acad. Manage. Rev. 24(1), 31-48.
29. Levin, M., and Greenwood, D. (2001). Pragmatic action research and the struggle to transform universities into learning communities. In Reason, P., and Bradbury, H. (eds.), Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice, Sage, London, pp. 103-113.
30. Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. J. Soc. Issues 2(4), 34-46.
31. Lewin, K. (1948). Resolving Social Conflicts, Harper, New York.
32. Lincoln, Y. S. (2001). Engaging sympathies: Relationships between action research and social constructivism. In Reason, P., and Bradbury, H. (eds.), Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice, Sage, London, pp. 124-132.
33. Lyneis, J. M. (1999). System dynamics for business strategy: A phased approach. Syst. Dyn. Rev. 15(1), 37-70.
34. Martin, A. W. (2001). Large-group processes as action research. In Reason, P., and Bradbury, H. (eds.), Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice, Sage, London, pp. 200-208.
35. McGrath, J. E., and Rotchford, N. L. (1983). Time and behavior in organizations. Res. Organiz. Behav. 5, 57-101.
36. McNiff, J. (1988). Action Research: Principles and Practice, Routledge, London.
37. Meyer, A. D., Brooks, G. R., and Goss, J. B. (1990). Environmental jolts and industry revolutions: Organizational responses to discontinuous change. Strateg. Manage. J. 11, 93-110.
38. Miller, D., and Chen, M.-J. (1994). Sources and consequences of competitive inertia: A study of the U.S. airline industry. Admin. Sci. Q. 39, 1-23.
39. Miller, D., and Friesen, P. H. (1980). Momentum and revolution in organizational adaptation. Acad. Manage. J. 23(4), 591-614.
40. Miller, D., and Friesen, P. H. (1982). Structural change and performance: Quantum versus piecemeal-incremental approaches. Acad. Manage. J. 25(4), 867-892.
41. Miller, D., and Friesen, P. H. (1984). Organizations A Quantum View, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
42. Mitchell, T. R., and James, L. R. (2001). Building better theory: Time and the specification of when things happen. Acad. Manage. Res. 26(4), 530-547.
43. Molineux, J., and Haslett, T. (2001). The use of soft systems methodology to redesign an organisational employment system. In Proceedings of the 7th Annual Conference of the Australia and New Zealand Systems Society, Perth, WA.
44. Molineux, J., and Haslett, T. (2002). An action research project in the use of a systemic human resource strategy for organizational cultural change. In Proceedings of the 6th International Quality, Innovation and Knowledge Conference, Kualalumpar, Malaysia.
45. Monks, K., and McMackin, J. (2001). Designing and aligning an HR system. Hum. Res. Manage. J. (London). 11(2), 57-72.
46. Morecroft, J. D. W. (1985). Rationality in the analysis of behavioral simulation models. Manage. Sci. 31, 900-916.
47. Nadler, D. A., and Tushman, M. L. (1998). Competing by Design, Oxford University Press, New York.
48. Ofori-Dankwa, J., and Julian, S. D. (2001). Complexifying organisational theory: Illustrations using time research. Acad. Manage. Rev. 26(3), 415-430.
49. Pala, Ö., and Vennix, J. (2001). Dynamics of organisational change. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference of the Systems Dynamics Society, Atlanta, GA.
50. Prigogine, I., and Stengers, I. (1984). Order Out of Chaos: Man's New Dialogue With Nature, Bantam Books, New York.
51. Reason, P., and Bradbury, H. (eds.) (2001). Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice, Sage, London.
52. Romanelli, E., and Tushman, M. L. (1994). Organizational transformation as punctuated equilibrium: An empirical test. Acad. Manage. J. 37(5), 1141-1166.
53. Sarah, R., Haslett, T., Molineux, J., Olsen, J., Stephens, J., Tepe, S., and Walker, B. (2002). Business action research in practice - A strategic conversation about conducting action research in business organizations. Syst. Pract. Action Res. (this issue).
54. Sastry, M. A. (1997). Problems and paradoxes in a model of punctuated organisational change. Admin. Sci. Q. 42(2), 237-276.
55. Schein, E. H. (1988). Organizational Culture and Leadership, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
56. Scott, W. R. (1987). The adolescence of institutional theory. Admin. Sci. Q. 32, 493-511.
57. Senge, P., Kleiner, A., Roberts, C., Ross, R., Roth, G., and Smith, B. (1999). The Dance of Change: The Challenges of Sustaining Momentum in Learning Organizations, Nicholas Brealey, London.
58. Senge, P., and Scharmer, O. (2001). Community action research: Learning as a community of practitioners, consultants and researchers. In Reason, P. and Bradbury, H. (eds.), Handbook of Action Researc: Participative Inquiry and Practice, Sage, London, pp. 238-249.
59. Sterman, J. D. (1994). Learning in and about complex systems. Syst. Dyn. Rev. 10, 291-330.
60. Thompson, M. P. (1988). Being, thought and action. In Quinn, R. E., and Cameron, K. S. (eds.), Paradox and Transformation, Ballinger, Cambridge, MA, pp. 123-135.
61. Tushman, M. L., Newman, W. H., and Romanelli, E. (1986). Convergence and upheaval: Managing the unsteady pace of organizational evolution. Calif. Manage. Rev. 29(1), 1-16.
62. Tushman, M. L., and Romanelli, E. (1985). Organizational Evolution: A metamorphosis model of convergence and reorientation. In Cummings, L. L., and Staw, B. M. (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 7, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 171-222.
63. Ulrich, D. (1997). Human Resource Champions, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
64. Van de Ven, A. H., and Poole, M. S. (1995). Explaining development and change in organizations. Acad. Manage. Rev. 20, 510-540.
65. Virany, B., Tushman, M. L., and Romanelli, E. (1992). Executive succession and organization outcomes in turbulent environments: An organization learning approach. Organiz. Sci. 3, 72-91.
66. Walton, R. E., and Gaffney, M. E. (1991). Research, action, and participation: The merchant shipping case. In Whyte, W. F. (ed.), Participatory Action Research, Sage, Newbury Park, CA, pp. 99-126.
67. Whyte, W. F. (1991). Comparing PAR and action acience. In Whyte, W. F. (ed.), Participatory Action Research, Sage, Newbury Park, CA, pp. 97-98.
68. Wollin, A. (1999). Punctuated equilibrium: Reconciling theory of revolutionary and incremental change. Syst. Res. Behav. Sci. 16(4), 359-367.
69. Wright, P. M., and Snell, S. A. (1998). Toward a unifying framework for exploring fit and flexibility in strategic human resource management. Acad. Manage. Rev. 23(4), 756-772.
70. Zucker, L. G. (1988). Where do institutional patterns come from? Organizations as actors in social systems. In Zucker, L. G. (ed.), Institutional Patterns and Organizations, Ballinger, Cambridge, MA, pp. 23-52.