Performance evaluation of the precision™ PCx™ point-of-care blood glucose analyzer using discriminant ratio methodology

Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine

Volumn 40, Issue 10, 2002, Pages 1052-1055

  Miendje Deyi, Véronique Y ^a   Philippe, Marianne ^a   Alexandre, Kathy C ^a   De Neyer, Philippe ^a   Hermans, Michel P ^a  

^a CLINIQUES UNIVERSITAIRES SAINT LUC   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Discriminant ratio; Glucose analyzer; PCx

Indexed keywords

GLUCOSE;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ANALYZER; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING; BLOOD SAMPLING; CAPILLARY BLOOD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DATA ANALYSIS; DEVICE; DIABETES MELLITUS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; GLUCOSE TOLERANCE TEST; HUMAN; INFORMATION SYSTEM; LABORATORY; LABORATORY TEST; LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS; METHODOLOGY; NURSING STAFF; PATIENT CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; REFERENCE VALUE; BLOOD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; INSTRUMENTATION; MONITORING; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY;

BLOOD GLUCOSE; DIABETES MELLITUS; HUMANS; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; POINT-OF-CARE SYSTEMS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 0036432153     PISSN: 14346621     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/CCLM.2002.184     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Ehrmeyer SS, Laessig RH. Point-of-care testing technology. Is quality control still relevant? MLO Med Lab Obs 1997; Suppl:10-3.
2. Levy J, Morris R, Hammersley M, Turner R. Discrimination, adjusted correlation, and equivalence of imprecise tests: application to glucose tolerance. Am J Phys 1999; 276: E365-E375.
3. Schmidt FH. Blood glucose levels in capilary blood of adults assessed by the hexokinase method. Klin Wochenschr 1973; 51:520-2.
4. Cass AE, Davis G, Francis GD, Hill HA, Aston WJ, Higgins IJ, et al. Ferrocene-mediated enzyme electrode for amperometric determination of glucose. Anal Chem 1984; 56:667-71.
5. Cooper GR. Methods for determining the amount of glucose in blood. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci 1973; 4:101-45.
6. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1:307-10.
7. Clarke WL, Cox D, Gonder-Frederick LA, Carter W, Pohl SL. Evaluating clinical accuracy of systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose. Diabetes Care 1987; 10:622-8.
8. Cox DJ, Gonder-Frederick LA, Kovatchev BP, Julian DM, Clarke WL. Understanding error grid analysis. Diabetes Care 1997; 20:911-2.
9. Weitgasser R, Gappmayer B, Pichler M. Newer portable glucose meters - analytical improvement compared with previous generation devices? Clin Chem 1999; 45:1821-5.
10. Fuller WA. Measurement error models. New York: Wiley, 1987:4.
11. Riggs DS, Guarnieri JA, Addelman S. Fitting straight lines when both variables are subject to error. Life Sci 1978; 22:1305-60.
12. Precision of test methods I: guide for the determination and reproducibility for a standard test method (BS 5497, part 1). London: British Standards Institution, 1979.
13. Godfrey K. Simple linear regression in medical research. N Eng J Med 1985; 13:1629-36.
14. Spilker B. Validation of clinical tests and measures. In: Guide to clinical trials. New York: Raven Press, 1991: 313-9.
15. Raggat PR. Duplicates or singletons? An analysis of the need for replication in immunoassay and a computer program to calculate the distribution of outliers, error rate and the precision profile from assay duplicates. Ann Clin Biochem 1989; 26:23-37.
16. Hermans MP, Levy JC, Morris RJ, Turner RC. Comparison of insulin sensitivity tests across a range of glucose tolerance from normal to diabetes. Diabetologia 1999; 42:678-87.
17. Hortin GL. Handbook of bedside glucose testing. New York: AACC Press, 1998.
18. American Diabetes Association. Consensus statement on self-monitoring of blood glucose. Diabetes Care 1987; 10:95-9.
19. American Diabetes Association. Self-monitoring of blood glucose consensus statement. Diabetes Care 1996; 10:95-9.