Newer portable glucose meters - Analytical improvement compared with previous generation devices?

Clinical Chemistry

Volumn 45, Issue 10, 1999, Pages 1821-1825

  Weitgasser, Raimund ^a   Gappmayer, Brigitta ^a   Pichler, Maximilian ^a  

^a St Johanns Spital   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DIABETES MELLITUS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; HUMAN; REFERENCE VALUE;

EID: 0032878556     PISSN: 00099147     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/clinchem/45.10.1821     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. 1. American Diabetes Association. Consensus statement on self-monitoring of blood glucose. Diabetes Care 1987;10:95-9.
2. 2. American Diabetes Association. Self-monitoring of blood glucose consensus statement. Diabetes Care 1996;19(Suppl 1):S62-6.
3. 3. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 1993;329:977-86.
4. 4. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care for patients with diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 1999;22(Suppl 1):S32-41.
5. 5. Klonoff DC. Noninvasive blood glucose monitoring. Diabetes Care 1997;20:433-7.
6. 6. Khalil OS. Spectroscopic and clinical aspects of noninvasive glucose measurements. Clin Chem 1999;45:165-77.
7. 7. Clarke WL, Cox D, Gonder-Frederick LA, Carter W, Pohl SL, Evaluating clinical accuracy of systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose. Diabetes Care 1987;10:622-8.
8. 8. Cox DJ, Gonder-Frederick LA, Kovatchev BP, Julian DM, Clarke WL. Understanding error grid analysis. Diabetes Care 1997;20:911-2.
9. 9. Chan JC, Wong RY, Cheung CK, Lam P, Chow CC, Yeung VT, et al. Accuracy, precision and user-acceptability of self blood glucose monitoring machines. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 1997;36:91-104.
10. 10. Weitgasser R, Gappmayer B. New portable devices for blood glucose measurement: comparison of MediSense Card, Glucometer Elite, Hypocount Supreme and Omnican control with the reference glucose oxidase method. Schweiz Med Wochenschr 1997;127:12-7.
11. 11. Brunner GA, Ellmerer M, Sendlhofer G, Wutte A, Trajanoski Z, Schaupp L, et al. Validation of home blood glucose meters with respect to clinical and analytical approaches. Diabetes Care 1998;21:585-90.
12. 12. Poirier J-Y, Le Prieur N, Campion L, Guilhem I, Allannic H, Maugendre D. Clinical and statistical evaluation of self-monitoring blood glucose meters. Diabetes Care 1998;21:1919-24.
13. 13. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;i:307-10.
14. 14. Dedrick RF, Davis WK. What do statistics really tell us about the quality of the data from self-monitoring of blood glucose? Diabet Med 1989;6:267-73.
15. 15. UKPDS Group. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulfonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and the risk of complications in patients with type diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet 1998;352:837-53.