Time-coherent expansion of MEG/EEG cortical sources

NeuroImage

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 1277-1289

  David, Olivier ^a   Garnero, Line ^a  

^a PITIÉ SALPÊTRIÈRE HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAIN CORTEX; BRAIN REGION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENSITY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; ELECTROSTIMULATION; EVOKED RESPONSE; FINGER; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MAGNETIC FIELD; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; METHODOLOGY; MODEL; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX; SOMATOSENSORY STIMULATION; TIME;

EID: 0036429318     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2002.1269     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Baillet, S., and Garnero, L. 1997. A Bayesian approach to introducing anatomo-functional priors in the EEG/MEG inverse problem. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 44(5): 374-385.
2. Baillet, S., Mosher, J. C., Jerbi, K., and Leahy, R. M. 2000. Hybrid MEG/EEG source characterization by cortical remapping and imaging of parametric source models. In Biomag2000 12th Int. Conf. on Biomagnetism, Helsinki, Finland.
3. Baillet, S., Mosher, J. C., and Leahy, R. M. 2001. Mapping human brain function using intrinsic electromagnetic signals. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine November, 14-30.
4. Buonomano, D. V., and Merzenich, M. M. 1998. Cortical plasticity: From synapses to maps. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 21: 149-186.
5. Crouzeix, A., Yvert, B., Bertrand, O., and Pernier, J. 1999. An evaluation of dipole reconstruction accuracy with spherical and realistic head models in MEG. Clin. Neurophysiol. 110(12): 2176-2188.
6. Dale, A. M., and Sereno, M. I. 1993. Improved localization of cortical activity by combining EEG and MEG with MRI cortical surface reconstruction: A linear approach. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 5(2): 162-176.
7. Dale, A. M., Fischl, B., and Sereno, M. I. 1999. Cortical surface-based analysis I: Segmentation and surface reconstruction NeuroImage 9:179-194.
8. David, O., Garnero, L., Cosmelli, D., and Varela, F. J. 2002. Estimation of neural dynamics from MEG/EEG cortical current density maps: Application to the reconstruction of large-scale cortical synchrony. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 49(9): 975-987.
9. Demoment, G. 1989. Image reconstruction and restoration: Overview of common estimation structure and problems. IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech, Signal Processing 37(12): 2024-2036.
10. Elbert, T., Pantev, C., Wienbruch, C., Rockstroh, B., and Taub, E. 1995. Increased cortical representation of the fingers of the left hand in string players. Science 270(5234): 305-307.
11. Fischl, B., Sereno, M. I., and Dale, A. M. 1999. Cortical surface-based analysis II: Inflation, flattening, a surface-based coordinate system. NeuroImage 9: 195-207.
12. Gavit, L., Baillet, S., Mangin, J.-F., Pescatore, J., and Garnero, L. 2001. A multiresolution framework to MEG/EEG source imaging. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 48(10): 1080-1087.
13. Golub, G. H., and van Loan, C. F. 1983. Matrix Computation. John Hopkins Univ. Press, Baltimore.
14. Gorodnitsky, I. F., George, J. S., and Rao, B. D. 1995. Neuromagnetic imaging with FOCUSS: A recursive weighted minimum norm algorithm. Electroencephalog. Clin. Neurophysiol. 95: 231-251.
15. Gross, J., Kujala, J., Hämäläinen, M., Timmermann, L., Schnitzler, A., and Salmelin, R. 2001. Dynamic imaging of coherant sources: Studying neural interactions in the human brain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98(2): 694-699.
16. Hämäläinen, M., Hari, R., Ilmoniemi, R., Knuutila, J., and Lounasmaa, O. 1993. Magnetoencephalography. Theory, instrumentation and applications to noninvasive study of human brain functions. Rev. Mod. Phys. 65(2): 413-497.
17. Hari, R., Karhu, J., Hämäläinen, M., Knuutila, J., Salonen, O., Sams, M., and Vilkman, V. 1993. Functional organization of the human first and second somatosensory cortices: A neuromagnetic study. Eur. J. Neurosci. 5: 724-734.
18. Hashimoto, I., Kimura, T., Iguchi, Y., Takino, R., and Sekihara, K. 2001. Dynamic activation of distinct cytoarchitectonic areas of the human SI cortex after median nerve stimulation. NeuroReport 12(9): 1891-1897.
19. Iwamura, Y., Tanaka, M., Sakamoto, M., and Hikosaka, O. 1983. Functional subdivisions representing different finger regions in area 3 of the first somatosensory cortex of the conscious monkey. Exp. Brain Res. 51: 315-326.
20. Jerbi, K., Mosher, J. C., Baillet, S., and Leahy, R. M. 2002. On MEG forward modeling using multipole expansions. Phys. Med. Biol. 47: 523-555.
21. Kakigi, R., Hoshiyama, M., Shimojo, M., Naka, D., Yamasaki, H., Watanabe, S., Xiang, J., Maeda, K., Lam, K., Itomi, K., and Nakamura, A. 2000. The somatosensory evoked magnetic fields. Prog. Neurobiol. 61: 495-523.
22. Kawamura, T., Nakasato, N., Seki, K., Kanno, A., Fujita, S., Fujiwara, S., and Yoshimoto, T. 1996. Neuromagnetic evidence of pre-and post-central cortical sources of somatosensory evoked responses. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 100: 44-50.
23. Kincses, W. E., Braun, C., Kaiser, S., and Elbert, T. 1999. Modeling extended sources of event-related potentials using anatomical and physiological constraints. Hum. Brain Mapp. 8: 182-193.
24. Kincses, W. E., Braun, C., Kaiser, S., and Mathiak, K. 2000. Modeling extended sources using a maximum likelihood estimator. In Biomag2000 12th Int. Conf. on Biomagnetism, Helsinki, Finland.
25. Krause, T., Kurth, R., Ruben, J., Schwiemann, J., Villringer, K., Deuchert, M., Moosmann, M., Brandt, S., Wolf, K.-J., Curio, G., and Villringer, A. 2001. Representational overlap of adjacent fingers in multiple areas of human primary somatosensory cortex depends on electrical stimulus intensity: An fMRI study. Brain Res. 899: 36-46.
26. Kurth, R., Villringer, K., Curio, G., Wolf, K.-J., Krause, T., Repenthin, J., Schwiemann, J., Deuchert, M., and Villringer, A. 2000. fMRI shows multiple somatotopic digit representations in human primary somatosensory cortex. NeuroReport 11(7): 1487-1491.
27. Lütkenhöner, B., Menninghaus, E., Steinsträter, O., Wienbruch, C., Gissler, H. M., and T. Elbert. 1995. Neuromagnetic source analysis using magnetic resonance images for the construction of source and volume conductor model. Brain Topogr. 7: 291-299.
28. Maldonado, P. E., Friedman-Hill, S., and Gray, C. M. 2000. Dynamics of striate cortical activity in the alert macaque: II. Fast time scale synchronization. Cereb. Cortex 10: 1117-1131.
29. Meunier, S., Garnero, L., Ducorps, A., Mazières, L., Lehéricy, S., Tézenas du Montcel, S., Renault, B., and Vidailhet, M. 2001. Human brain mapping in dystonia reveals both endophenotypic traits and adaptative reorganization. Ann. Neurol. 50: 521-527.
30. Mogilner, A., Grossman, J. A. I., Ribary, U., Joliot, M., Volkmann, J., Rapaport, D., Beasley, R. W., and Llinás, R. R. 1993. Somatosensory cortical plasticity in adult humans revealed by magnetoencephalography. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 90: 3593-3597.
31. Mosher, J. C., and Leahy, R. M. 1999. Source localization using recursively applied and projected (RAP) MUSIC. IEEE Trans. Signal Processing 47: 332-340.
32. Mosher, J. C., Leahy, R. M., Shattuck, D. W., and Baillet, S. 1999. MEG source imaging using multipolar expansions. In 16th Conference on Information Processing in Medical Imaging, LCNS, pp. 15-28.
33. Nolte, G., and Curio, G. 1997. On the calculation of magnetic fields based on multiple modeling of focal biological current sources. Biophys. J. 73: 1253-1262.
34. Nolte, G., and Curio, G. 2000. Current multipole expansion to estimate lateral extent of neuronal activity: A theoretical analysis. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 47(10): 1347-1355.
35. Nunez, P. L. 1981. Electric Fields of the Brain. Oxford, New York.
36. Nunez, P. L., and Silberstein, R. B. 2000. On the relationship of synaptic activity to macroscopic measurements: Does co-registration of EEG with fMRI make sense? Brain Topogr. 13: 79-96.
37. Pantev, C., Oostenveld, R., Engelien, A., Ross, B., Robert, L. E., and Hoke, M. 1998. Increased auditory cortical representation in musicians. Nature 392: 811-814.
38. Press, W. H., Teukolsky, S. A., and Vetterling, W. T. 1992. Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing. Cambridge Univ. Press, New York.
39. Sarvas, J. 1987. Basis mathematic and electromagnetic concepts of the biomagnetic inverse problem. Phys. Med. Biol. 32(1): 11-22.
40. Shoham, D., and Grinvald, A. 2001. The cortical representation of the hand in macaque and human areas S-I: High resolution optical imaging. J. Neurosci. 21(17): 6820-6835.
41. Srebro, R. 1996. An iterative approach to the solution of the inverse problem. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 98: 349-362.
42. Tikhonov, A., and Arsenin, V. 1977. Solutions of III-Posed Problems. Winston, Washington DC.
43. Tononi, G., McIntosh, A. R., Russel, D. P., and Edelman, G. M. 1998. Functional clustering: Identifying strongly interactive brain regions in neuroimaging data. NeuroImage 7: 133-149.
44. van Veen, B. D., van Drongelen, W., Yuchtman, M., and Suzuki, A. 1997. Localization of brain electrical activity via linearly constrained minimum variance spatial filtering. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 44(9): 867-880.
45. Wikswo, J. P. Jr., and Swinney, K. R. 1984. A comparison of scalar multipole expansions. J. Appl. Phys. 56(11): 3039-3049.
46. Wikswo, J. P. Jr., and Swinney, K. R. 1985. Scalar multipole expansions and their dipole equivalents. J. Appl. Phys. 57(9): 4301-4308.